Benchmark Almanac

Omni-Cloze

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 64.8% leads since March 2026
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 64.8% leads since March 2026
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 64.8% leads since March 2026
Fading

Models write detailed captions of audio, visual and audio-visual clips. A cloze test on the caption content scores the detail.

Released with the Omni-Captioner paper. Qwen3.5-Omni and Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash report it.

Released
October 2025
Kind
Video captioning
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 3.1 Pro #39 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Fine-grained perception of multimodal information is critical for advancing human-AI interaction. With recent progress in audio-visual technologies, Omni Language Models (OLMs), capable of processing audio and video signals in parallel, have emerged as a promising paradigm for achieving richer understanding and reasoning. However, their capacity to capture and describe fine-grained details remains limited explored. In this work, we present a systematic and comprehensive investigation of omni detailed perception from the perspectives of the data pipeline, models, and benchmark. We first identify an inherent "co-growth" between detail and hallucination in current OLMs. To address this, we propose Omni-Detective, an agentic data generation pipeline integrating tool-calling, to autonomously produce highly detailed yet minimally hallucinatory multimodal data. Based on the data generated with Omni-Detective, we train two captioning models: Audio-Captioner for audio-only detailed perception, and Omni-Captioner for audio-visual detailed perception. Under the cascade evaluation protocol, Audio-Captioner achieves the best performance on MMAU and MMAR among all open-source models, surpassing Gemini 2.5 Flash and delivering performance comparable to Gemini 2.5 Pro. On existing detailed captioning benchmarks, Omni-Captioner sets a new state-of-the-art on VDC and achieves the best trade-off between detail and hallucination on the video-SALMONN 2 testset. Given the absence of a dedicated benchmark for omni detailed perception, we design Omni-Cloze, a novel cloze-style evaluation for detailed audio, visual, and audio-visual captioning that ensures stable, efficient, and reliable assessment. Experimental results and analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of Omni-Detective in generating high-quality detailed captions, as well as the superiority of Omni-Cloze in evaluating such detailed captions.

Abstract of Omni-Captioner: Data Pipeline, Models, and Benchmark for Omni Detailed Perception (arXiv:2510.12720, CC0)
3
Models scored in lab cards
3
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 64.8% among models released by September 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 64.8% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 64.8%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 64.8%
  2. 2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 63.2%
  3. 3 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 63%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 64.8% Mar 2026 Lab model card
2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 63.2% Sep 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 63% Mar 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 64.8% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 63% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3.1 Pro 57.2% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 64.8% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 63.2% Sep 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 63% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 3.1 Pro 57.2% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 3 models. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in October 2025 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Mar 2026
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2026

Sources: Official Omni-Cloze leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus Gemini 3.1 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus Gemini 3.1 Pro

Sources: Official Omni-Cloze leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in September 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 18, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 63.2 OmniCloze Audio-Visual Caption
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 63 Omni-Cloze, Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 64.8 Omni-Cloze

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 22, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 63.2 OmniCloze (Table 5) Capabilities
Apr 17, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 64.8 Omni-Cloze (Table 7) Capabilities

2 lab claims next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 2 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 64.8% Omni-Cloze 64.8% Leaderboard Same
Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 63% Omni-Cloze, Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 63% Leaderboard Same

More in Audio and video

All 233 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%