Benchmark Almanac

OmniBench

Claude-3.5-Sonnet [snapshot unspecified] 59.4% tops its leaderboard Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 56.1% leads the models we track
LongCat-Flash-Omni 61.4% leads since October 2025
Dropped

Models answer multiple choice questions that need an image, an audio clip and text together. Scored by accuracy.

Omni models such as Qwen Omni and LongCat-Flash-Omni report it.

Released
September 2024
Kind
Audio understanding and voice
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-4o Aug 2024 #166 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
October 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
October 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Recent advancements in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have aimed to integrate and interpret data across diverse modalities. However, the capacity of these models to concurrently process and reason about multiple modalities remains underexplored, partly due to the lack of comprehensive modality-wise benchmarks. We introduce OmniBench, a novel benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate models' ability to recognize, interpret, and reason across visual, acoustic, and textual inputs simultaneously. We define language models capable of such tri-modal processing as the omni-language models (OLMs). OmniBench is distinguished by high-quality human annotations, ensuring that accurate responses require integrated understanding and reasoning across all three modalities. Our main findings reveal that: i) open-source OLMs exhibit critical limitations in instruction-following and reasoning capabilities within tri-modal contexts; and ii) most baselines models perform poorly (below 50% accuracy) even when provided with alternative textual representations of images or/and audio. These results suggest that the ability to construct a consistent context from text, image, and audio is often overlooked in existing MLLM training paradigms. To address this gap, we curate an instruction tuning dataset of 84.5K training samples, OmniInstruct, for training OLMs to adapt to tri-modal contexts. We advocate for future research to focus on developing more robust tri-modal integration techniques and training strategies to enhance OLMs. Codes, data and live leaderboard could be found at https://m-a-p.ai/OmniBench.

Abstract of OmniBench: Towards The Future of Universal Omni-Language Models (arXiv:2409.15272, CC0)
34
Entries on its own leaderboard, 16 models we track
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
2
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Claude-3.5-Sonnet [snapshot unspecified] tops the leaderboard with 59.4%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen2.5-Omni-7B, at 56.1%.

LongCat-Flash-Omni leads with 61.4%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in March 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude-3.5-Sonnet [snapshot unspecified] textual_audio 59.4%
  2. 2 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B image-audio 56.1%
  3. 3 InternVL2-40B textual_audio 54.3%
  4. 4 MiniCPM-o 2.6 7B textual_audio 53.2%
  5. 5 InternVL2-26B textual_audio 51.8%
  6. 6 GPT-4o Aug 2024, textual_audio 51.1%
  7. 7 InternVL2-8B textual_audio 50.8%
  8. 8 GPT-4o mini textual_audio 49%
  9. 9 Qwen2-VL-Chat 7B textual_audio 48.6%
  10. 10 VITA-1.5 7B textual_audio 48.5%
  11. 11 Baichuan-Omni-1.5 7B textual_audio 47.9%
  12. 12 LLaVA-OneVision 7B textual_audio 47%
  13. 13 Cambrian-1-34B textual_audio 46.8%
  14. 14 Mantis-Idefics2 8B textual_audio 46.1%
  15. 15 Idefics2-8B textual_audio 45.1%
  16. 16 Cambrian-1-13B textual_audio 45%
  17. 17 Gemini-1.5-Pro [snapshot unspecified] textual_audio 44.4%
  18. 18 VITA 8x7B textual_image-audio 44.2%
  19. 19 Baichuan-Omni 7B textual_image-audio 44.2%
  20. 20 XComposer2-4KHD 7B textual_audio 44%
  21. 21 UnifiedIO2-xlarge 3.2B textual_audio 43.2%
  22. 22 Qwen2-VL-Chat 2B textual_audio 42.5%
  23. 23 InternVL2-2B textual_audio 42.3%
  24. 24 Cambrian-1-8B textual_audio 42.1%
  25. 25 UnifiedIO2-xxlarge 6.8B textual_audio 40.8%
  26. 26 Deepseek-VL-Chat 7B textual_audio 39.7%
  27. 27 GPT-4V textual_audio 38.2%
  28. 28 LLaVA-OneVision 0.5B textual_audio 38%
  29. 29 OpenOmni 7B image-audio 37.4%
  30. 30 video-Salmonn 13B image-audio 35.6%
  31. 31 UnifiedIO2-large 1.1B textual_audio 34.3%
  32. 32 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024, textual_audio 33.4%
  33. 33 Reka Core image-audio 30.4%
  34. 34 AnyGPT 7B image-audio 18%

Source: Official OmniBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude-3.5-Sonnet [snapshot unspecified] 59.4% textual_audio Official leaderboard
2 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 56.1% image-audio Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
3 InternVL2-40B 54.3% textual_audio Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
4 MiniCPM-o 2.6 7B 53.2% textual_audio Official leaderboard
5 InternVL2-26B 51.8% textual_audio Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-4o Aug 2024 51.1% textual_audio Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
7 InternVL2-8B 50.8% textual_audio Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-4o mini 49% textual_audio Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen2-VL-Chat 7B 48.6% textual_audio Official leaderboard
10 VITA-1.5 7B 48.5% textual_audio Official leaderboard
11 Baichuan-Omni-1.5 7B 47.9% textual_audio Official leaderboard
12 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 47% textual_audio Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Cambrian-1-34B 46.8% textual_audio Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
14 Mantis-Idefics2 8B 46.1% textual_audio Official leaderboard
15 Idefics2-8B 45.1% textual_audio Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
16 Cambrian-1-13B 45% textual_audio Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Gemini-1.5-Pro [snapshot unspecified] 44.4% textual_audio Official leaderboard
18 VITA 8x7B 44.2% textual_image-audio Official leaderboard
19 Baichuan-Omni 7B 44.2% textual_image-audio Official leaderboard
20 XComposer2-4KHD 7B 44% textual_audio Official leaderboard
21 UnifiedIO2-xlarge 3.2B 43.2% textual_audio Official leaderboard
22 Qwen2-VL-Chat 2B 42.5% textual_audio Official leaderboard
23 InternVL2-2B 42.3% textual_audio Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
24 Cambrian-1-8B 42.1% textual_audio Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
25 UnifiedIO2-xxlarge 6.8B 40.8% textual_audio Official leaderboard
26 Deepseek-VL-Chat 7B 39.7% textual_audio Official leaderboard
27 GPT-4V 38.2% textual_audio Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
28 LLaVA-OneVision 0.5B 38% textual_audio Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
29 OpenOmni 7B 37.4% image-audio Official leaderboard
30 video-Salmonn 13B 35.6% image-audio Official leaderboard
31 UnifiedIO2-large 1.1B 34.3% textual_audio Official leaderboard
32 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 33.4% textual_audio Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
33 Reka Core 30.4% image-audio Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
34 AnyGPT 7B 18% image-audio Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 LongCat-Flash-Omni 61.4% Oct 2025 Lab model card
2 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 56.1% image-audio Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
3 InternVL2-40B 54.3% textual_audio Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
4 InternVL2-26B 51.8% textual_audio Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-4o Aug 2024 51.1% textual_audio Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
6 InternVL2-8B 50.8% textual_audio Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-4o mini 49% textual_audio Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
8 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 47% textual_audio Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Cambrian-1-34B 46.8% textual_audio Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Idefics2-8B 45.1% textual_audio Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
11 Cambrian-1-13B 45% textual_audio Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
12 InternVL2-2B 42.3% textual_audio Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Cambrian-1-8B 42.1% textual_audio Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
14 GPT-4V 38.2% textual_audio Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
15 LLaVA-OneVision 0.5B 38% textual_audio Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
16 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 33.4% textual_audio Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Reka Core 30.4% image-audio Apr 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
InternVL2-40B
textual_ima… textual_aud…
54.3%
InternVL2-8B
textual_ima… textual_aud…
50.8%
Cambrian-1-13B
textual_ima… textual_aud…
45%

Source: Official OmniBench leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B image-audio 56.1%
InternVL2-40B textual_audio 54.3%
InternVL2-26B textual_audio 51.8%
GPT-4o Aug 2024 textual_audio 51.1%
InternVL2-8B textual_audio 50.8%
GPT-4o mini textual_audio 49%
InternVL2-8B textual_image 47.5%
InternVL2-40B textual_image 47.2%
LLaVA-OneVision 7B textual_audio 47%
Cambrian-1-34B textual_audio 46.8%
Idefics2-8B textual_audio 45.1%
Cambrian-1-13B textual_audio 45%
Cambrian-1-13B textual_image 43.1%
InternVL2-2B textual_audio 42.3%
Cambrian-1-8B textual_audio 42.1%
GPT-4V textual_audio 38.2%
LLaVA-OneVision 0.5B textual_audio 38%
GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 textual_audio 33.4%
Reka Core image-audio 30.4%

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in September 2024 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in September 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Shanghai AI Lab Qwen Meituan
Own leaderboard Not tested since Mar 2025
Lab claims Not tested since Oct 2025

Sources: Official OmniBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) LongCat-Flash-Omni Qwen2.5-Omni-7B InternVL2-40B Cambrian-1-34B GPT-4V 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) LongCat-Flash-Omni InternVL2-40B

Sources: Official OmniBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since October 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
Meituan
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 61.4 OmniBench
Mar 27, 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 56.1 OmniBench Avg (Speech 55.25 / Sound Event 60.00 / Music 52.83)

2 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 61.4 OmniBench, internally corrected version (Table 14) Capabilities
Mar 26, 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B technical report 56.1 OmniBench Avg (Table 8). Speech 55.25, Sound Event 60.00, Music 52.83 Capabilities

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 56.1% OmniBench Avg (Speech 55.25 / Sound Event 60.00 / Music 52.83) 56.1% Leaderboard, image-audio Same

More in Audio and video

All 233 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%