Open ASR Leaderboard
Speech recognition models transcribe the test sets of several English and multilingual corpora. Scored by average word error rate, with speed reported next to it.
Built on the ESB test sets. ASR model cards often report its average WER.
- Made by
- Hugging Face (hf-audio) and collaborators
- Released
- September 2023
- Kind
- Speech recognition and translation
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Last in a launch post
- March 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We present the Open ASR Leaderboard, a reproducible benchmarking platform with community contributions from academia and industry. It compares 86 open-source and proprietary systems across 12 datasets, with English short- and long-form and multilingual short-form tracks. We standardize word error rate (WER) and inverse real-time factor (RTFx) evaluation for consistent accuracy-efficiency comparisons across model architectures and toolkits (e.g., ESPNet, NeMo, SpeechBrain, Transformers). We observe that Conformer-based encoders paired with transformer-based decoders achieve the best average WER, while connectionist temporal classification (CTC) and token-and-duration transducer (TDT) decoders offer superior RTFx, making them better suited for long-form and batched processing. All code and dataset loaders are open-sourced to support transparent, extensible evaluation. We present our evaluation methodology to facilitate community-driven benchmarking in ASR and other tasks.
Phi-4-multimodal leads with 6.14%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Cohere Transcribe leads with 5.42% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
- 1
Phi-4-multimodal 6.14%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1
Cohere Transcribe 5.42%
- 2
Qwen3-ASR-1.7B 5.76%
- 3
Phi-4-multimodal 6.02%
- 4
Voxtral Small 6.62%
Source: Official Open ASR Leaderboard leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 6.14% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 5.42% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 5.76% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 6.02% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 6.62% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 25 entries, 4 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
WER versus RTFx
The line joins the runs that no other run beats on both measures. We redrew this chart from the numbers on the official leaderboard.
| Model | Setting | Word error rate | Real-time factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 5.4% | 525 | |
| IBM Granite Speech 4.0 1B | 5.5% | 280 | |
| NVIDIA Canary Qwen 2.5B | 5.6% | 418 | |
| IBM Granite Speech 3.3 8B | 5.8% | 145 | |
| | 5.8% | 148 | |
| IBM Granite Speech 3.3 2B | 6% | 271 | |
| | 6% | 151 | |
| NVIDIA Parakeet TDT 0.6B v2 | 6.1% | 3,390 | |
| NVIDIA Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 | 6.3% | 3,330 | |
| NVIDIA Canary 1B | 6.5% | 235 | |
| | 6.6% | 54.1 | |
| Nyra Health CrisperWhisper | 6.7% | 84.1 | |
| NVIDIA Canary 1B v2 | 7.2% | 749 | |
| Distil-Whisper Large v3.5 | 7.2% | 202 | |
| NVIDIA Parakeet CTC 1.1B | 7.4% | 2,730 | |
| OpenAI Whisper Large v3 | 7.4% | 146 | |
| OpenAI Whisper Large v3 Turbo | 7.8% | 200 | |
| Meta Omnilingual ASR LLM 7B v2 | 8.1% | 66 | |
| NVIDIA FastConformer CTC Large | 9% | 6,400 |
Number one over time 3 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in September 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Open ASR Leaderboard leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official Open ASR Leaderboard leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in March 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2026 | 5.42 | Hugging Face Open ASR Leaderboard average WER, as of 2026-03-26 |
3 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | | 9.28 | OpenASR (WER), lower is better, non-reasoning (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Apr 27, 2026 | | 5.95 | OpenASR Avg WER, English subset, lower is better, reasoning off (Table 8). AMI 11.09, Earnings22 11.27, GigaSpeech 9.66, LibriSpeech clean 1.57, other 2.96, SPGISpeech 1.98, TED-LIUM 3.44, VoxPopuli 5.6 | Capabilities |
| Mar 3, 2025 | | 6.14 | OpenASR, average WER over 8 sets, lower is better (Tables 3 and 4) | Capabilities |
One lab claim next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 6.14% OpenASR, average WER over 8 sets, lower is better (Tables 3 and 4) | 6.02% Leaderboard | Same |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%