Benchmark Almanac

OpenBookQA

Hermes 4.3 36B 96.6% leads since December 2025
Hermes 4.3 36B 96.6% leads since December 2025
Fading

Models answer elementary science multiple-choice questions that need a given core science fact plus common knowledge. Scored by accuracy.

Saturated by frontier models.

Released
September 2018
Kind
Exam questions
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Llama 3.1-405B #162 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
December 2025, dropped after it saturated
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We present a new kind of question answering dataset, OpenBookQA, modeled after open book exams for assessing human understanding of a subject. The open book that comes with our questions is a set of 1329 elementary level science facts. Roughly 6000 questions probe an understanding of these facts and their application to novel situations. This requires combining an open book fact (e.g., metals conduct electricity) with broad common knowledge (e.g., a suit of armor is made of metal) obtained from other sources. While existing QA datasets over documents or knowledge bases, being generally self-contained, focus on linguistic understanding, OpenBookQA probes a deeper understanding of both the topic—in the context of common knowledge—and the language it is expressed in. Human performance on OpenBookQA is close to 92%, but many state-of-the-art pre-trained QA methods perform surprisingly poorly, worse than several simple neural baselines we develop. Our oracle experiments designed to circumvent the knowledge retrieval bottleneck demonstrate the value of both the open book and additional facts. We leave it as a challenge to solve the retrieval problem in this multi-hop setting and to close the large gap to human performance.

Abstract of Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering (arXiv:1809.02789, CC0)
24
Models scored in lab cards
9
Launch posts list it, from 3 labs
22
System cards report it, from 6 labs

Hermes 4.3 36B leads with 96.6%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Hermes 4.3 36B leads with 96.6%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 Hermes 4.3 36B 96.6%
  2. 2 Hermes 4 405B 94.2%
  3. 3 Phi-3.5-MoE 89.6%
  4. 4 phi-3-small 7.4B 88%
  5. 5 phi-3-medium 14B 87.4%
  6. 6 phi-3-mini 3.8B 83.2%
  7. 7 Phi-3.5-mini 79.2%
  8. 8 Phi-4 Mini 79.2%
  9. 9 DeepSeek LLM 67B 63.2%
  10. 10 Llama 2-70B 60.2%
  11. 11 Llama 2-7B 58.6%
  12. 12 PaLM 2-L 58.5%
  13. 13 Llama 2-34B 58.2%
  14. 14 Llama 2-13B 57%
  15. 15 Gemma 7B 52.8%
  16. 16 Llama 3.1-405B 49.2%
  17. 17 Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 48.8%
  18. 18 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 48.6%
  19. 19 Gemma 2B 47.8%
  20. 20 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 47.8%
  21. 21 Llama 3.1-70B 47.6%
  22. 22 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B Base 46.2%
  23. 23 Llama 3.1-8B 45%
  24. 24 BitNet b1.58 2B4T 41.6%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Sources: Labs’ model cards and Another board, via Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Hermes 4.3 36B 96.6% Dec 2025 Lab model card
2 Hermes 4 405B 94.2% Aug 2025 Lab model card
3 Phi-3.5-MoE 89.6% Aug 2024 Lab model card
4 phi-3-small 7.4B 88% Aug 2024 Lab model card
5 phi-3-medium 14B 87.4% Aug 2024 Lab model card
6 phi-3-mini 3.8B 83.2% Aug 2024 Lab model card
7 Phi-3.5-mini 79.2% Aug 2024 Lab model card
8 Phi-4 Mini 79.2% Feb 2025 Lab model card
9 DeepSeek LLM 67B 63.2% Jan 2024 Lab model card
10 Llama 2-70B 60.2% Jul 2023 Lab model card
11 Llama 2-7B 58.6% Jul 2023 Lab model card
12 PaLM 2-L 58.5% May 2023 Lab model card
13 Llama 2-34B 58.2% Jul 2023 Lab model card
14 Llama 2-13B 57% Jul 2023 Lab model card
15 Gemma 7B 52.8% Feb 2024 Lab model card
16 Llama 3.1-405B 49.2% Nov 2024 Lab model card
17 Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 48.8% Oct 2026 Lab model card
18 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 48.6% Jun 2026 Lab model card
19 Gemma 2B 47.8% Mar 2024 Lab model card
20 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 47.8% Oct 2026 Lab model card
21 Llama 3.1-70B 47.6% Nov 2024 Lab model card
22 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B Base 46.2% Dec 2025 Lab model card
23 Llama 3.1-8B 45% Nov 2024 Lab model card
24 BitNet b1.58 2B4T 41.6% Apr 2025 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Hermes 4.3 36B 96.6% Dec 2025 Lab model card
2 Hermes 4 405B 94.2% Aug 2025 Lab model card
3 Phi-3.5-MoE 89.6% Aug 2024 Lab model card
4 phi-3-mini 3.8B 88% Apr 2024 Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI
5 phi-3-small 7.4B 88% Aug 2024 Lab model card
6 phi-3-medium 14B 87.4% Aug 2024 Lab model card
7 GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 86% Nov 2023 Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI
8 Mixtral 8x7B 85.8% Dec 2023 Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI
9 Llama 3-8B 82.6% Apr 2024 Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI
10 Mistral 7B v0.1 79.8% Sep 2023 Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI
11 Phi-3.5-mini 79.2% Aug 2024 Lab model card
12 Phi-4 Mini 79.2% Feb 2025 Lab model card
13 Gemma 7B 78.6% Feb 2024 Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI
14 Phi-2 73.6% Dec 2023 Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI
15 PaLM (540B) 68% Apr 2022 Claim in PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways, via Epoch AI
16 InstructGPT 175B 65.4% Jan 2022 Claim in GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-o…, via Epoch AI
17 Falcon-180B 64.2% Sep 2023 Claim in The Falcon Series of Open Language Models, via Epoch AI
18 DeepSeek LLM 67B 63.2% Jan 2024 Lab model card
19 GLaM 63% Dec 2021 Claim in GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-o…, via Epoch AI
20 LLaMA-65B 60.2% Feb 2023 Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI
21 Llama 2-70B 60.2% Jul 2023 Lab model card
22 LLaMA-33B 58.6% Feb 2023 Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI
23 Llama 2-7B 58.6% Jul 2023 Lab model card
24 PaLM 2-L 58.5% May 2023 Lab model card
25 Llama 2-34B 58.2% Jul 2023 Lab model card
26 PaLM 2-M 57.4% May 2023 Claim in PaLM 2 Technical Report, via Epoch AI
27 LLaMA-7B 57.2% Feb 2023 Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI
28 Llama 2-13B 57% Jul 2023 Lab model card
29 Falcon-40B 56.6% Mar 2023 Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI
30 LLaMA-13B 56.4% Feb 2023 Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI
31 PaLM 2-S 56.2% May 2023 Claim in PaLM 2 Technical Report, via Epoch AI
32 MPT-30B 52% Jun 2023 Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI
33 Falcon-7B 51.6% Apr 2023 Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI
34 MPT-7B 51.4% May 2023 Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI
35 PaLM 62B 50.4% Apr 2022 Claim in LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models, via Epoch AI
36 Llama 3.1-405B 49.2% Nov 2024 Lab model card
37 Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 48.8% Oct 2026 Lab model card
38 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 48.6% Jun 2026 Lab model card
39 Gemma 2B 47.8% Mar 2024 Lab model card
40 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 47.8% Oct 2026 Lab model card
41 Llama 3.1-70B 47.6% Nov 2024 Lab model card
42 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B Base 46.2% Dec 2025 Lab model card
43 Llama 3.1-8B 45% Nov 2024 Lab model card
44 BitNet b1.58 2B4T 41.6% Apr 2025 Lab model card
45 XGen-7B 40.2% Jun 2023 Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI
46 RedPajama-INCITE-7B-Base 40% May 2023 Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI
47 OPT-1.3B 39.8% May 2022 Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI
48 Dolly 2.0-12b 39.2% Apr 2023 Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI
49 open_llama_7b 39% Jun 2023 Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI
50 GPT-NeoX-20B 38.8% Apr 2022 Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI
51 GPT-J-6B 38.2% Aug 2021 Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI
52 Phi-1.5 37.2% Sep 2023 Claim in Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical report, via Epoch AI
53 Cerebras-GPT-13B 35.8% Mar 2023 Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI
54 vicuna-13b-v1.1 33% Apr 2023 Claim in Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical report, via Epoch AI
55 stablelm-tuned-alpha-7b 32.4% Apr 2023 Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI
56 GPT-Neo-2.7B 23.2% Mar 2021 Claim in Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical report, via Epoch AI
57 GPT-2 (1.5B) 22.4% Nov 2019 Claim in Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical report, via Epoch AI

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 8 entries, 0 of them models we track. Epoch AI collected claims for 41 models from labs’ reports and papers. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

7 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023 8 models have held number one with claims included since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Other labs Meta DeepSeek Microsoft Nous Research
Lab claims Passed 85% in Apr 2024, by phi-3-medium 14B

Source: Labs’ model cards

A claim for GPT-3.5 Turbo that Epoch AI collected passed 85% in November 2023

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card A claim Epoch AI collected from a report or paper Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Random guessing Hermes 4.3 36B Phi-3.5-MoE Mistral 7B v0.1 PaLM (540B) GLaM GPT-J-6B GPT-Neo-2.7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2020 2022 2024 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Random guessing Hermes 4.3 36B Phi-3.5-MoE

Sources: Labs’ model cards and claims collected by Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)

Labs headline it less often now, last in December 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
Microsoft
Nous Research
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Dec 3, 2025 Hermes 4.3 36B 96.6 OBQA
Aug 26, 2025 Hermes 4 405B 94.2 OBQA (reasoning)
Apr 15, 2025 BitNet b1.58 2B4T 41.6 OpenbookQA
Feb 26, 2025 Phi-4 Mini 79.2 OpenBookQA (10-shot)
Aug 20, 2024 Phi-3.5-MoE 89.6 OpenBookQA (10-shot)
Apr 22, 2024 phi-3-medium 14B 87.2 OpenBookQA (10-Shot)
Feb 21, 2024 Gemma 7B 52.8 OpenBookQA
Dec 12, 2023 Phi-2 OpenBookQA (in Language Understanding average only)
May 10, 2023 PaLM 2-L 58.5 OpenBookQA, 1-shot

22 system cards report it, from 6 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base technical report 48.8 OpenBookQA, 0-shot acc_norm, Table 6 Capabilities
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base technical report 47.8 OpenBookQA, 0-shot acc_norm, Table 6 Capabilities
Jun 4, 2026 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base model card 48.6 OpenBookQA, 0-shot acc_norm Capabilities
Dec 23, 2025 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B Base technical report 46.2 OpenBookQA, 0-shot acc_norm, base model Table 2 Capabilities
Aug 25, 2025 Hermes 4 405B technical report 94.2 OBQA, reasoning mode (Table 3). Non-reasoning 84.4 Capabilities
Apr 16, 2025 BitNet b1.58 2B4T technical report 41.6 OpenbookQA (0-shot; Acc,norm) (Table 1, Table 3) Capabilities
Mar 3, 2025 Phi-4 Mini technical report 79.2 OpenBookQA (10-Shot) (Table 7) Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-8B technical report 45 OpenBookQA, pretrained (Table 11) Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-70B technical report 47.6 OpenBookQA, pretrained (Table 11) Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-405B technical report 49.2 OpenBookQA, pretrained (Table 11) Capabilities
Aug 30, 2024 phi-3-small 7.4B technical report 88 OpenBookQA (10-Shot) (Section 3 table) Capabilities
Aug 30, 2024 phi-3-mini 3.8B technical report 83.2 OpenBookQA (10-Shot) (Section 3 table) Capabilities
Aug 30, 2024 phi-3-medium 14B technical report 87.4 OpenBookQA (10-Shot) (Section 3 table) Capabilities
Aug 30, 2024 Phi-3.5-MoE technical report 89.6 OpenBookQA (10-shot) (Table 3) Capabilities
Aug 30, 2024 Phi-3.5-mini technical report 79.2 OpenBookQA (10-shot) (Table 3) Capabilities
Mar 13, 2024 Gemma 7B technical report 52.8 OBQA, PT (Table 6) Capabilities
Mar 13, 2024 Gemma 2B technical report 47.8 OBQA, PT (Table 6) Capabilities
Jan 5, 2024 DeepSeek LLM 67B technical report 63.2 OpenBookQA, DeepSeek 67B Chat (Table 6) Capabilities
Jul 19, 2023 Llama 2-7B technical report 58.6 OBQA, 0-shot, pretrained (Table 20) Capabilities
Jul 19, 2023 Llama 2-70B technical report 60.2 OBQA, 0-shot, pretrained (Table 20) Capabilities
Jul 19, 2023 Llama 2-34B technical report 58.2 OBQA, 0-shot, pretrained (Table 20) Capabilities
Jul 19, 2023 Llama 2-13B technical report 57 OBQA, 0-shot, pretrained (Table 20) Capabilities

More in Knowledge

All 121 in Knowledge
  • MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects. Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
  • SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy. Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
  • WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1. Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
  • BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly. Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
  • KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry. Solar Pro 4 79.2%
  • HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed. Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%