OpenBookQA
Models answer elementary science multiple-choice questions that need a given core science fact plus common knowledge. Scored by accuracy.
Saturated by frontier models.
- Made by
- Allen Institute for AI
- Released
- September 2018
- Kind
- Exam questions
- Level
- School
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Llama 3.1-405B #162 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- December 2025, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We present a new kind of question answering dataset, OpenBookQA, modeled after open book exams for assessing human understanding of a subject. The open book that comes with our questions is a set of 1329 elementary level science facts. Roughly 6000 questions probe an understanding of these facts and their application to novel situations. This requires combining an open book fact (e.g., metals conduct electricity) with broad common knowledge (e.g., a suit of armor is made of metal) obtained from other sources. While existing QA datasets over documents or knowledge bases, being generally self-contained, focus on linguistic understanding, OpenBookQA probes a deeper understanding of both the topic—in the context of common knowledge—and the language it is expressed in. Human performance on OpenBookQA is close to 92%, but many state-of-the-art pre-trained QA methods perform surprisingly poorly, worse than several simple neural baselines we develop. Our oracle experiments designed to circumvent the knowledge retrieval bottleneck demonstrate the value of both the open book and additional facts. We leave it as a challenge to solve the retrieval problem in this multi-hop setting and to close the large gap to human performance.
Hermes 4.3 36B leads with 96.6%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Hermes 4.3 36B leads with 96.6%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 96.6 Hermes 4.3 36B
- 94.2 Hermes 4 405B
- 89.6
Phi-3.5-MoE
- 88.0
phi-3-small 7.4B
- 87.4
phi-3-medium 14B
- 83.2
phi-3-mini 3.8B
- 79.2
Phi-3.5-mini
- 79.2
Phi-4 Mini
- 63.2
DeepSeek LLM 67B
- 60.2
Llama 2-70B
- 58.6
Llama 2-7B
- 58.5 PaLM 2-L
- 58.2
Llama 2-34B
- 57.0
Llama 2-13B
- 52.8
Gemma 7B
- 49.2
Llama 3.1-405B
- 48.8
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base
- 48.6
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base
- 47.8
Gemma 2B
- 47.8
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base
- 47.6
Llama 3.1-70B
- 46.2
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B Base
- 45.0
Llama 3.1-8B
- 41.6
BitNet b1.58 2B4T
- 1 Hermes 4.3 36B 96.6%
- 2 Hermes 4 405B 94.2%
- 3
Phi-3.5-MoE 89.6%
- 4
phi-3-small 7.4B 88%
- 5
phi-3-medium 14B 87.4%
- 6
phi-3-mini 3.8B 83.2%
- 7
Phi-3.5-mini 79.2%
- 8
Phi-4 Mini 79.2%
- 9
DeepSeek LLM 67B 63.2%
- 10
Llama 2-70B 60.2%
- 11
Llama 2-7B 58.6%
- 12 PaLM 2-L 58.5%
- 13
Llama 2-34B 58.2%
- 14
Llama 2-13B 57%
- 15
Gemma 7B 52.8%
- 16
Llama 3.1-405B 49.2%
- 17
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 48.8%
- 18
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 48.6%
- 19
Gemma 2B 47.8%
- 20
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 47.8%
- 21
Llama 3.1-70B 47.6%
- 22
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B Base 46.2%
- 23
Llama 3.1-8B 45%
- 24
BitNet b1.58 2B4T 41.6%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 96.6 Hermes 4.3 36B
- 94.2 Hermes 4 405B
- 89.6
Phi-3.5-MoE
- 88.0
phi-3-mini 3.8B
- 88.0
phi-3-small 7.4B
- 87.4
phi-3-medium 14B
- 86.0 GPT-3.5 Turbo
- 85.8
Mixtral 8x7B
- 82.6
Llama 3-8B
- 79.8
Mistral 7B v0.1
- 79.2
Phi-3.5-mini
- 79.2
Phi-4 Mini
- 78.6
Gemma 7B
- 73.6
Phi-2
- 68.0
PaLM (540B)
- 65.4 InstructGPT 175B
- 64.2
Falcon-180B
- 63.2
DeepSeek LLM 67B
- 63.0
GLaM
- 60.2
LLaMA-65B
- 60.2
Llama 2-70B
- 58.6
LLaMA-33B
- 58.6
Llama 2-7B
- 58.5 PaLM 2-L
- 58.2
Llama 2-34B
- 57.4 PaLM 2-M
- 57.2
LLaMA-7B
- 57.0
Llama 2-13B
- 56.6
Falcon-40B
- 56.4
LLaMA-13B
- 56.2 PaLM 2-S
- 52.0
MPT-30B
- 51.6
Falcon-7B
- 51.4
MPT-7B
- 50.4 PaLM 62B
- 49.2
Llama 3.1-405B
- 48.8
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base
- 48.6
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base
- 47.8
Gemma 2B
- 47.8
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base
- 47.6
Llama 3.1-70B
- 46.2
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B Base
- 45.0
Llama 3.1-8B
- 41.6
BitNet b1.58 2B4T
- 40.2
XGen-7B
- 40.0 RedPajama-INCITE-7B-Base
- 39.8
OPT-1.3B
- 39.2
Dolly 2.0-12b
- 39.0 open_llama_7b
- 38.8 GPT-NeoX-20B
- 38.2 GPT-J-6B
- 37.2
Phi-1.5
- 35.8
Cerebras-GPT-13B
- 33.0 vicuna-13b-v1.1
- 32.4 stablelm-tuned-alpha-7b
- 23.2 GPT-Neo-2.7B
- 22.4 GPT-2 (1.5B)
- 1 Hermes 4.3 36B 96.6%
- 2 Hermes 4 405B 94.2%
- 3
Phi-3.5-MoE 89.6%
- 4
phi-3-mini 3.8B 88%
- 5
phi-3-small 7.4B 88%
- 6
phi-3-medium 14B 87.4%
- 7 GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 86%
- 8
Mixtral 8x7B 85.8%
- 9
Llama 3-8B 82.6%
- 10
Mistral 7B v0.1 79.8%
- 11
Phi-3.5-mini 79.2%
- 12
Phi-4 Mini 79.2%
- 13
Gemma 7B 78.6%
- 14
Phi-2 73.6%
- 15
PaLM (540B) 68%
- 16 InstructGPT 175B 65.4%
- 17
Falcon-180B 64.2%
- 18
DeepSeek LLM 67B 63.2%
- 19
GLaM 63%
- 20
LLaMA-65B 60.2%
- 21
Llama 2-70B 60.2%
- 22
LLaMA-33B 58.6%
- 23
Llama 2-7B 58.6%
- 24 PaLM 2-L 58.5%
- 25
Llama 2-34B 58.2%
- 26 PaLM 2-M 57.4%
- 27
LLaMA-7B 57.2%
- 28
Llama 2-13B 57%
- 29
Falcon-40B 56.6%
- 30
LLaMA-13B 56.4%
- 31 PaLM 2-S 56.2%
- 32
MPT-30B 52%
- 33
Falcon-7B 51.6%
- 34
MPT-7B 51.4%
- 35 PaLM 62B 50.4%
- 36
Llama 3.1-405B 49.2%
- 37
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 48.8%
- 38
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 48.6%
- 39
Gemma 2B 47.8%
- 40
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 47.8%
- 41
Llama 3.1-70B 47.6%
- 42
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B Base 46.2%
- 43
Llama 3.1-8B 45%
- 44
BitNet b1.58 2B4T 41.6%
- 45
XGen-7B 40.2%
- 46 RedPajama-INCITE-7B-Base 40%
- 47
OPT-1.3B 39.8%
- 48
Dolly 2.0-12b 39.2%
- 49 open_llama_7b 39%
- 50 GPT-NeoX-20B 38.8%
- 51 GPT-J-6B 38.2%
- 52
Phi-1.5 37.2%
- 53
Cerebras-GPT-13B 35.8%
- 54 vicuna-13b-v1.1 33%
- 55 stablelm-tuned-alpha-7b 32.4%
- 56 GPT-Neo-2.7B 23.2%
- 57 GPT-2 (1.5B) 22.4%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and Another board, via Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hermes 4.3 36B | 96.6% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Hermes 4 405B | 94.2% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 89.6% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 88% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 87.4% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 83.2% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 79.2% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 79.2% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 63.2% | Jan 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 60.2% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 58.6% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | PaLM 2-L | 58.5% | May 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 58.2% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 57% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 52.8% | Feb 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 49.2% | Nov 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 48.8% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 48.6% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 47.8% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 47.8% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 47.6% | Nov 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 46.2% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 45% | Nov 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 41.6% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hermes 4.3 36B | 96.6% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Hermes 4 405B | 94.2% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 89.6% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 88% | Apr 2024 | Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI | |
| 5 | | 88% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 87.4% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 | 86% | Nov 2023 | Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI | |
| 8 | | 85.8% | Dec 2023 | Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI | |
| 9 | | 82.6% | Apr 2024 | Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI | |
| 10 | | 79.8% | Sep 2023 | Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI | |
| 11 | | 79.2% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 79.2% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 78.6% | Feb 2024 | Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI | |
| 14 | | 73.6% | Dec 2023 | Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI | |
| 15 | | 68% | Apr 2022 | Claim in PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways, via Epoch AI | |
| 16 | InstructGPT 175B | 65.4% | Jan 2022 | Claim in GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-o…, via Epoch AI | |
| 17 | | 64.2% | Sep 2023 | Claim in The Falcon Series of Open Language Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 18 | | 63.2% | Jan 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 63% | Dec 2021 | Claim in GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-o…, via Epoch AI | |
| 20 | | 60.2% | Feb 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 21 | | 60.2% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 58.6% | Feb 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 23 | | 58.6% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | PaLM 2-L | 58.5% | May 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 58.2% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | PaLM 2-M | 57.4% | May 2023 | Claim in PaLM 2 Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 27 | | 57.2% | Feb 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 28 | | 57% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | | 56.6% | Mar 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 30 | | 56.4% | Feb 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 31 | PaLM 2-S | 56.2% | May 2023 | Claim in PaLM 2 Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 32 | | 52% | Jun 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 33 | | 51.6% | Apr 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 34 | | 51.4% | May 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 35 | PaLM 62B | 50.4% | Apr 2022 | Claim in LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 36 | | 49.2% | Nov 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 37 | | 48.8% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 38 | | 48.6% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 39 | | 47.8% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 40 | | 47.8% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 41 | | 47.6% | Nov 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 42 | | 46.2% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 43 | | 45% | Nov 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 44 | | 41.6% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 45 | | 40.2% | Jun 2023 | Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 46 | RedPajama-INCITE-7B-Base | 40% | May 2023 | Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 47 | | 39.8% | May 2022 | Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 48 | | 39.2% | Apr 2023 | Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 49 | open_llama_7b | 39% | Jun 2023 | Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 50 | GPT-NeoX-20B | 38.8% | Apr 2022 | Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 51 | GPT-J-6B | 38.2% | Aug 2021 | Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 52 | | 37.2% | Sep 2023 | Claim in Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical report, via Epoch AI | |
| 53 | | 35.8% | Mar 2023 | Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 54 | vicuna-13b-v1.1 | 33% | Apr 2023 | Claim in Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical report, via Epoch AI | |
| 55 | stablelm-tuned-alpha-7b | 32.4% | Apr 2023 | Claim in XGen-7B Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 56 | GPT-Neo-2.7B | 23.2% | Mar 2021 | Claim in Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical report, via Epoch AI | |
| 57 | GPT-2 (1.5B) | 22.4% | Nov 2019 | Claim in Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical report, via Epoch AI |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 8 entries, 0 of them models we track. Epoch AI collected claims for 41 models from labs’ reports and papers. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
7 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023 8 models have held number one with claims included since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
A claim for GPT-3.5 Turbo that Epoch AI collected passed 85% in November 2023
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Labs’ model cards and claims collected by Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)
Labs headline it less often now, last in December 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025 | Hermes 4.3 36B | 96.6 | OBQA |
| Aug 26, 2025 | Hermes 4 405B | 94.2 | OBQA (reasoning) |
| Apr 15, 2025 | 41.6 | OpenbookQA | |
| Feb 26, 2025 | 79.2 | OpenBookQA (10-shot) | |
| Aug 20, 2024 | 89.6 | OpenBookQA (10-shot) | |
| Apr 22, 2024 | 87.2 | OpenBookQA (10-Shot) | |
| Feb 21, 2024 | 52.8 | OpenBookQA | |
| Dec 12, 2023 | OpenBookQA (in Language Understanding average only) | ||
| May 10, 2023 | 58.5 | OpenBookQA, 1-shot |
22 system cards report it, from 6 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | | 48.8 | OpenBookQA, 0-shot acc_norm, Table 6 | Capabilities |
| Oct 15, 2026 | | 47.8 | OpenBookQA, 0-shot acc_norm, Table 6 | Capabilities |
| Jun 4, 2026 | | 48.6 | OpenBookQA, 0-shot acc_norm | Capabilities |
| Dec 23, 2025 | | 46.2 | OpenBookQA, 0-shot acc_norm, base model Table 2 | Capabilities |
| Aug 25, 2025 | Hermes 4 405B technical report | 94.2 | OBQA, reasoning mode (Table 3). Non-reasoning 84.4 | Capabilities |
| Apr 16, 2025 | | 41.6 | OpenbookQA (0-shot; Acc,norm) (Table 1, Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Mar 3, 2025 | | 79.2 | OpenBookQA (10-Shot) (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Nov 23, 2024 | | 45 | OpenBookQA, pretrained (Table 11) | Capabilities |
| Nov 23, 2024 | | 47.6 | OpenBookQA, pretrained (Table 11) | Capabilities |
| Nov 23, 2024 | | 49.2 | OpenBookQA, pretrained (Table 11) | Capabilities |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 88 | OpenBookQA (10-Shot) (Section 3 table) | Capabilities |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 83.2 | OpenBookQA (10-Shot) (Section 3 table) | Capabilities |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 87.4 | OpenBookQA (10-Shot) (Section 3 table) | Capabilities |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 89.6 | OpenBookQA (10-shot) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 79.2 | OpenBookQA (10-shot) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Mar 13, 2024 | | 52.8 | OBQA, PT (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Mar 13, 2024 | | 47.8 | OBQA, PT (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jan 5, 2024 | | 63.2 | OpenBookQA, DeepSeek 67B Chat (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 58.6 | OBQA, 0-shot, pretrained (Table 20) | Capabilities |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 60.2 | OBQA, 0-shot, pretrained (Table 20) | Capabilities |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 58.2 | OBQA, 0-shot, pretrained (Table 20) | Capabilities |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 57 | OBQA, 0-shot, pretrained (Table 20) | Capabilities |
More in Knowledge
- MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects.
Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
- SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
- WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1.
Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
- BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly.
Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
- KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry.
Solar Pro 4 79.2%
- HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed.
Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%