Benchmark Almanac

Gemma 2B

Gemma 2B.

Google DeepMind Released February 21st, 2024 Compare with others
35
Benchmarks with a score
0
Ranked first, out of five or more models
0
In the top three
Google DeepMind Feb 2024

Gemma 2B

Open weights

76.0 #241 of 256
Epoch Capabilities Index
Self-Reported Index 88.5 #402 of 404
  • Open Arabic LLM Leaderboard v1 36% #52 /55
  • IneqMath 0% #31 /34
  • SIQA 49.7% #19 /24

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MuSR 39.8% #59 of 98 Official leaderboard
OpenBookQA 47.8% #19 of 24 Lab model card
SIQA 49.7% #19 of 24 Lab model card
TruthfulQA 44.8% #25 of 30 Lab model card
HellaSwag 71.4% #47 of 53 Lab model card
AlpacaEval 2.0 5.44% #43 of 47 Official leaderboard
PIQA 77.3% #34 of 37 Lab model card
TriviaQA 53.2% #37 of 40 Lab model card
WinoGrande 65.4% #44 of 47 Lab model card
MMLU-Pro 15.8% #200 of 212 Official leaderboard
BIG-Bench Hard 35.2% #69 of 73 Lab model card
Open Arabic LLM Leaderboard v1 36% #52 of 55 Official leaderboard
CommonSenseQA 65.3% #18 of 19 Lab model card
Natural Questions 12.5% #19 of 20 Lab model card
ARC-Easy 73.2% #22 of 23 Lab model card
ARC-Challenge 42.1% #47 of 49 Lab model card
BoolQ 69.4% #27 of 28 Lab model card
LMArena (Elo) 1,094 #325 of 335 Official leaderboard
MMLU 42.3% #129 of 131 Lab model card
EQ-Bench v2 23.3 #84 of 85 Official leaderboard
WildBench -5.25 #47 of 47 Official leaderboard
AGIEval 24.2% #40 of 40 Lab model card

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
IneqMath 0% #31 of 34 Official leaderboard
MATH 11.8% #96 of 99 Lab model card
GSM8K 17.7% #91 of 92 Lab model card

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
HumanEval+ 20.7% #43 of 46 Official leaderboard
HumanEval 22% #98 of 101 Lab model card
MBPP+ 34.1% #34 of 35 Official leaderboard
MBPP 29.2% #70 of 71 Lab model card

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
ToxiGen 29.8 #1 of 4 Lab model card
CrowS-Pairs 45.8% #2 of 4 Lab model card
CyberMetric 19.2% #9 of 10 Official leaderboard
Winogender 51.3% #4 of 4 Lab model card
BOLD 45.6 #2 of 2 Lab model card

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Open LLM Leaderboard v2 7.32 #91 of 99 Official leaderboard

Its lab's numbers put it at 88.5, 12.5 points above its ECI

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 19 capability results Google DeepMind reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 86.1 to 90.9. How we compute it.

Its lab's numbers next to 2 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
MBPP 29.2% MBPP, PT, 3-shot (Table 6) 41.8% Leaderboard, EvalPlus subset, original tests −13 pts
HumanEval 22% HumanEval, PT, pass@1 (Table 6) 25% Leaderboard −3.0 pts

Google DeepMind's models over time

Google DeepMind's models in color, against every other model on the Epoch Capabilities Index, by release date.

50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Gemini 4 Carbon Gemini 3.8 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3 Pro Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 1.5 Pro 50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Gemini 4 Carbon Gemini 3.8 Flash

Source: Epoch Capabilities Index, Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 26 of them aren't in the launch post.

Capabilities

Hallucination

Safety