RefSpatial-Bench
Real images where the model points to an object or free space defined by multi-step spatial relations. Scored by mask hit.
No independent leaderboard. Subset aggregation not stated. One cross-checked row (RoboBrain2.0-7B) differs from its origin: 42.2 vs 32.50.
- Made by
- BAAI (RoboRefer)
- Released
- June 2025
- Kind
- Embodied reasoning
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B #77 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- April 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- May 2026
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads with 73.6% among models released by July 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 73.6
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 72.6
Seed2.0 Pro
- 70.0
Qwen3.6 27B
- 69.9
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 69.3
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 67.7
Qwen3.5-27B
- 64.3
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 63.5
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 58.5
Qwen3.5-9B
- 56.3
Seed1.8
- 54.6
Qwen3.5-4B
- 53.1
Cosmos3-Nano
- 48.5
gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview
- 48.4
Cosmos3-Edge
- 32.9
Qwen3.5-2B
- 23.5
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 1
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 73.6%
- 2
Seed2.0 Pro 72.6%
- 3
Qwen3.6 27B 70%
- 4
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 69.9%
- 5
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 69.3%
- 6
Qwen3.5-27B 67.7%
- 7
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 64.3%
- 8
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 63.5%
- 9
Qwen3.5-9B 58.5%
- 10
Seed1.8 56.3%
- 11
Qwen3.5-4B 54.6%
- 12
Cosmos3-Nano 53.1%
- 13
gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview 48.5%
- 14
Cosmos3-Edge 48.4%
- 15
Qwen3.5-2B 32.9%
- 16
Qwen3.5-0.8B 23.5%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 73.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 72.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 70% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 69.9% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 69.3% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 67.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 64.3% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 63.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 58.5% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 56.3% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 54.6% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 53.1% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 48.5% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 48.4% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 32.9% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 23.5% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card |
3 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in June 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2026 | 70 | RefSpatialBench | |
| Apr 15, 2026 | 64.3 | RefSpatialBench | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 23.5 | RefSpatialBench 23.5/21.7 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 32.9 | RefSpatialBench 32.9/30.0 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 54.6 | RefSpatialBench | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 58.5 | RefSpatialBench | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 63.5 | RefSpatialBench | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 67.7 | RefSpatialBench | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 69.3 | RefSpatialBench | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 73.6 | RefSpatialBench | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 56.3 | RefSpatialBench | |
| Sep 23, 2025 | 69.9 | RefSpatialBench |
6 system cards report it, from 4 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2026 | | 53.1 | RefSpatial, Cosmos3-Nano 8B column, Table 10 | Capabilities |
| May 31, 2026 | | 48.4 | RefSpatial, Cosmos3-Edge 2B column, Table 10 | Capabilities |
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 56.3 | RefSpatialBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 72.6 | RefSpatialBench (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 69.9 | RefSpatialBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Sep 25, 2025 | | 48.5 | RefSpatial (Table 19, thinking on). Thinking off 41.8 | Capabilities |
Versions
More in Robotics
- ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
- RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
- RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
- Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
- Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
- Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%