Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting
Models answer multiple-choice questions on tacit lab knowledge and troubleshooting that need hands-on expertise. Scored as cons@32.
OpenAI Preparedness evaluation. The questions are not public.
- Made by
- OpenAI with Gryphon Scientific
- Released
- August 2024
- Kind
- Lab protocols
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- Kept private
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last in a system card
- October 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
GPT-6 Luna leads with 94%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 94.0 GPT-6 Luna
- 88.5 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 84.1 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 83.0 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 82.2 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 81.7 GPT-5.5 Pro
- 79.2 GPT-6 Sol
- 78.3 GPT-5.5
- 78.3 GPT-Rosalind-6
- 77.0 GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
- 74.0 gpt-oss-120b
- 73.0 gpt-oss-20b
- 73.0 GPT-5.2 Codex
- 72.0 OpenAI deep research
- 72.0 GPT-4.5
- 72.0 GPT-5.3 Codex
- 71.7 GPT-5.4 Mini
- 70.0 o3
- 69.0 GPT-4o
- 68.9 GPT-5.5 Instant
- 68.0 o4-mini
- 68.0 GPT-5 mini
- 66.7 o1-mini
- 66.7 o1-preview
- 66.0 o1
- 66.0 GPT-5
- 65.0 GPT-5.4
- 63.3 GPT-6 Astra
- 58.0 o3-mini
- 48.0 GPT-5.2
- 1 GPT-6 Luna 94%
- 2 GPT-6.1 Sol 88.5%
- 3 GPT-5.6 Terra 84.1%
- 4 GPT-5.6 Luna 83%
- 5 GPT-5.6 Sol 82.2%
- 6 GPT-5.5 Pro 81.7%
- 7 GPT-6 Sol 79.2%
- 8 GPT-5.5 78.3%
- 9 GPT-Rosalind-6 78.3%
- 10 GPT-5.1-Codex-Max 77%
- 11 gpt-oss-120b 74%
- 12 gpt-oss-20b 73%
- 13 GPT-5.2 Codex 73%
- 14 OpenAI deep research 72%
- 15 GPT-4.5 72%
- 16 GPT-5.3 Codex 72%
- 17 GPT-5.4 Mini 71.7%
- 18 o3 70%
- 19 GPT-4o May 2024 69%
- 20 GPT-5.5 Instant 68.9%
- 21 o4-mini 68%
- 22 GPT-5 mini 68%
- 23 o1-mini 66.7%
- 24 o1-preview 66.7%
- 25 o1 66%
- 26 GPT-5 66%
- 27 GPT-5.4 65%
- 28 GPT-6 Astra 63.3%
- 29 o3-mini 58%
- 30 GPT-5.2 48%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Luna | 94% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 88.5% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 84.1% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 83% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 82.2% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | GPT-5.5 Pro | 81.7% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | GPT-6 Sol | 79.2% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | GPT-5.5 | 78.3% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | GPT-Rosalind-6 | 78.3% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | 77% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | gpt-oss-120b | 74% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | gpt-oss-20b | 73% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | GPT-5.2 Codex | 73% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | OpenAI deep research | 72% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | GPT-4.5 | 72% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | GPT-5.3 Codex | 72% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 71.7% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | o3 | 70% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 69% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | GPT-5.5 Instant | 68.9% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | o4-mini | 68% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | GPT-5 mini | 68% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | o1-mini | 66.7% | Sep 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | o1-preview | 66.7% | Sep 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | o1 | 66% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | GPT-5 | 66% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | GPT-5.4 | 65% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | GPT-6 Astra | 63.3% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | o3-mini | 58% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | GPT-5.2 | 48% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card |
8 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in August 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
OpenAI’s own number for GPT-6.1 Sol passed 85% in September 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
39 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2026 | GPT-Rosalind-6 system card | 78.3 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32 (refusal-adjusted 85.0%), Table 4 Biorisk knowledge | Bio and chem risk |
| Oct 29, 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card addendum | 90.8 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32 (Table 8) | Bio and chem risk |
| Oct 7, 2026 | GPT-6 Sol system card addendum | 72.5 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32 (Table 8) | Bio and chem risk |
| Oct 7, 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card addendum | 94 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32 (Table 8) | Bio and chem risk |
| Sep 29, 2026 | GPT-6.1 Sol system card addendum | 88.5 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, refusal-adjusted cons@32 (9.1.1.1) | Bio and chem risk |
| Sep 22, 2026 | GPT-6 Sol system card | 79.2 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32 (Table 33, A.8.1.1.1) | Bio and chem risk |
| Sep 22, 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card | 69.2 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32 (Table 33, A.8.1.1.1) | Bio and chem risk |
| Sep 3, 2026 | GPT-6 Astra system card | 63.3 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32 (refusal-adjusted 90.00%) (10.1.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk |
| Aug 6, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card addendum | 82.2 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32 with refusals or safe completions counted (78.81% without), printed chart label (Figure 5, 7.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk |
| Aug 6, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card addendum | 83 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32 with refusals or safe completions counted (76.67% without), printed chart label (Figure 5, 7.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra system card | 84.1 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, refusals and safe completions counted as successes, stated in text (9.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, chart without printed numbers (Figures 26, 27, 9.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk | |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, chart without printed numbers (Figures 26, 27, 9.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk | |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra system card | 84.1 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, refusals and safe completions counted as successes, stated in text (9.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, chart without printed numbers (Figures 26, 27, 9.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk | |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, chart without printed numbers (Figures 26, 27, 9.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk | |
| May 4, 2026 | GPT-5.5 Instant system card | 68.9 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32 (80.79% counting refusals or safe completions), printed chart label (Figure 5, 8.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk |
| Apr 23, 2026 | GPT-5.5 system card | 78.3 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, printed chart label (Figure 14, 9.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk |
| Apr 23, 2026 | GPT-5.5 Pro system card | 81.7 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32 excluding refusals, GPT-5.5 Pro, text only, not pictured (9.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk |
| Mar 17, 2026 | GPT-5.4 Mini system card | 71.7 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32 (77.77% counting refusals) (Table 18) | Bio and chem risk |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GPT-5.4 system card | 65 | Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32 excluding refusals (83.8% counting refusals and safe completions) (Figure 10, 5.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk |
| Feb 5, 2026 | GPT-5.3 Codex system card | 72 | Tacit knowledge and troubleshooting, cons@32, printed chart label, refusals counted as failures (Figure 1, 5.1.1.1) | Bio and chem risk |
| Dec 18, 2025 | GPT-5.2 Codex system card addendum | 73 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, printed chart label (Figure 3, 5.1.1.3) | Bio and chem risk |
| Dec 11, 2025 | GPT-5.2 system card addendum | 48 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, gpt-5.2 browsing, printed chart label (Figure 7). Text gives 83.33% with refusals counted as passes | Bio and chem risk |
| Nov 18, 2025 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max system card | 77 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, printed chart label and text (82% with refusals counted) (Figure 4, 5.1.1.4) | Bio and chem risk |
| Aug 7, 2025 | GPT-5 system card | 66 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, browsing launch candidate (Figure 12) | Bio and chem risk |
| Aug 7, 2025 | GPT-5 mini system card | 68 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, gpt-5-thinking-mini browsing launch candidate (Figure 12) | Bio and chem risk |
| Aug 5, 2025 | gpt-oss-20b model card | 73 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, gpt-oss 20b browsing launch candidate (Figure 8) | Bio and chem risk |
| Aug 5, 2025 | gpt-oss-120b model card | 74 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, gpt-oss 120b browsing launch candidate (Figure 8) | Bio and chem risk |
| Jul 17, 2025 | ChatGPT agent system card | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, chart shows only ChatGPT Agent browsing helpful-only at 74%, no released-model value (Figure 4, 5.1.1.4) | Bio and chem risk | |
| Apr 16, 2025 | o4-mini system card | 68 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, o4-mini no browsing launch candidate, printed chart label (Figure 6) | Bio and chem risk |
| Apr 16, 2025 | o3 system card | 70 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, o3 no browsing launch candidate, printed chart label (Figure 6) | Bio and chem risk |
| Feb 27, 2025 | GPT-4.5 system card | 72 | Tacit knowledge and troubleshooting, post-mitigation (4.3.5) | Bio and chem risk |
| Feb 25, 2025 | OpenAI deep research system card | 72 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, post-mitigation with browsing, printed chart label (without browsing 68%) (3.4.4) | Bio and chem risk |
| Jan 31, 2025 | o3-mini system card | 58 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, o3-mini (Post), printed chart label (5.4.8) | Bio and chem risk |
| Dec 5, 2024 | o1 system card | 66 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, cons@32, o1 (post-mitigation), printed chart label (5.5.8) | Bio and chem risk |
| Sep 12, 2024 | o1-preview system card | 66.7 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, pass rate cons@32, o1-preview (post-mitigation), printed chart label (4.3.6) | Bio and chem risk |
| Sep 12, 2024 | o1-mini system card | 66.7 | Biorisk Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting, pass rate cons@32, o1-mini (post-mitigation), printed chart label (4.3.6) | Bio and chem risk |
| Aug 8, 2024 | GPT-4o system card | 69 | Tacit knowledge and troubleshooting evaluation set, consensus@10 (3.6) | Bio and chem risk |
More in Biology and chemistry
- GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
- SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score.
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
- LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
- MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
- ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
- MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%