TemporalBench
Video models answer about 10K questions on fine-grained temporal dynamics, built from about 2K detailed human annotations of video clips.
The format field is a guess from the question-answer design.
- Made by
- Cai et al. (TemporalBench team)
- Released
- October 2024
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Last in a launch post
- May 2025, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- May 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Understanding fine-grained temporal dynamics is crucial for multimodal video comprehension and generation. Due to the lack of fine-grained temporal annotations, existing video benchmarks mostly resemble static image benchmarks and are incompetent at evaluating models for temporal understanding. In this paper, we introduce TemporalBench, a new benchmark dedicated to evaluating fine-grained temporal understanding in videos. TemporalBench consists of ~10K video question-answer pairs, derived from ~2K high-quality human annotations detailing the temporal dynamics in video clips. As a result, our benchmark provides a unique testbed for evaluating various temporal understanding and reasoning abilities such as action frequency, motion magnitude, event order, etc. Moreover, it enables evaluations on various tasks like both video question answering and captioning, both short and long video understanding, as well as different models such as multimodal video embedding models and text generation models. Results show that state-of-the-art models like GPT-4o achieve only 38.5% question answering accuracy on TemporalBench, demonstrating a significant gap (~30%) between humans and AI in temporal understanding. Furthermore, we notice a critical pitfall for multi-choice QA where LLMs can detect the subtle changes in negative captions and find a centralized description as a cue for its prediction, where we propose Multiple Binary Accuracy (MBA) to correct such bias. We hope that TemporalBench can foster research on improving models' temporal reasoning capabilities. Both dataset and evaluation code will be made available.
GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 35.3%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is LLaVA-OneVision 72B, at 28.1%.
Seed1.5-VL leads with 79.8%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 35.3 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 34.3 LLaVA-Video-72b
- 33.8 LLaVA-Video-72B
- 31.7 Qwen2-VL-72B
- 28.1 LLaVA-OneVision 72B
- 25.6 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 25.0 Aria
- 24.1 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified)
- 22.9 LLaVA-Video-7B
- 21.7 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct
- 20.5 LLaVA-NeXT-Video-7B
- 20.4 MiniCPM-V-2_6
- 20.3 VideoLLaVA
- 19.9 LLaVA-NeXT-Video-34B
- 19.0
LLaVA-v1.6-34B
- 18.9 LongVU
- 18.7
LLaVA-OneVision 7B
- 18.6 Flan-T5-XL
- 18.5
Yi-34B
- 16.7 InternLM-XC2.5
- 15.9 Flan-T5-XXL
- 15.5 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
- 15.4
Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct
- 15.3 LLaVA-1.5-7B
- 13.7
LLaVA-v1.5-13B
- 13.3 LanguageBind
- 13.3 M3
- 12.4 ImageBind
- 12.0 XCLIP
- 10.1 Vicuna7b-1-5
- 9.10 MA-LMM
- 1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 64 frames 35.3%
- 2 LLaVA-Video-72b 16 frames 34.3%
- 3 LLaVA-Video-72B 64 frames 33.8%
- 4 Qwen2-VL-72B 32 frames 31.7%
- 5 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 8 frames 28.1%
- 6 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 1FPS frames 25.6%
- 7 Aria 32 frames 25%
- 8 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 8 frames 24.1%
- 9 LLaVA-Video-7B 32 frames 22.9%
- 10 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 32 frames 21.7%
- 11 LLaVA-NeXT-Video-7B 8 frames 20.5%
- 12 MiniCPM-V-2_6 1FPS frames 20.4%
- 13 VideoLLaVA 8 frames 20.3%
- 14 LLaVA-NeXT-Video-34B 32 frames 19.9%
- 15
LLaVA-v1.6-34B 1 frames 19%
- 16 LongVU 1FPS frames 18.9%
- 17
LLaVA-OneVision 7B 32 frames 18.7%
- 18 Flan-T5-XL 0 frames 18.6%
- 19
Yi-34B 0 frames 18.5%
- 20 InternLM-XC2.5 1FPS frames 16.7%
- 21 Flan-T5-XXL 0 frames 15.9%
- 22 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 2 frames 15.5%
- 23
Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct 1 frames 15.4%
- 24 LLaVA-1.5-7B 1 frames 15.3%
- 25
LLaVA-v1.5-13B 1 frames 13.7%
- 26 LanguageBind 8 frames 13.3%
- 27 M3 6 frames 13.3%
- 28 ImageBind 2 frames 12.4%
- 29 XCLIP 8 frames 12%
- 30 Vicuna7b-1-5 0 frames 10.1%
- 31 MA-LMM 4 frames 9.10%
Source: Official TemporalBench leaderboard
- 1
Seed1.5-VL 79.8%
- 2 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 8 frames 28.1%
- 3 Aria 32 frames 25%
- 4 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 32 frames 21.7%
- 5 MiniCPM-V-2_6 1FPS frames 20.4%
- 6
LLaVA-v1.6-34B 1 frames 19%
- 7
LLaVA-OneVision 7B 32 frames 18.7%
- 8
Yi-34B 0 frames 18.5%
- 9 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 2 frames 15.5%
- 10
Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct 1 frames 15.4%
- 11
LLaVA-v1.5-13B 1 frames 13.7%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official TemporalBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 35.3% | 64 frames | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | LLaVA-Video-72b | 34.3% | 16 frames | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | LLaVA-Video-72B | 33.8% | 64 frames | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Qwen2-VL-72B | 31.7% | 32 frames | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | LLaVA-OneVision 72B | 28.1% | 8 frames | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 25.6% | 1FPS frames | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Aria | 25% | 32 frames | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) | 24.1% | 8 frames | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | LLaVA-Video-7B | 22.9% | 32 frames | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 21.7% | 32 frames | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | LLaVA-NeXT-Video-7B | 20.5% | 8 frames | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | MiniCPM-V-2_6 | 20.4% | 1FPS frames | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | VideoLLaVA | 20.3% | 8 frames | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | LLaVA-NeXT-Video-34B | 19.9% | 32 frames | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 19% | 1 frames | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | LongVU | 18.9% | 1FPS frames | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 18.7% | 32 frames | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Flan-T5-XL | 18.6% | 0 frames | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 18.5% | 0 frames | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | InternLM-XC2.5 | 16.7% | 1FPS frames | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | Flan-T5-XXL | 15.9% | 0 frames | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 15.5% | 2 frames | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | | 15.4% | 1 frames | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | LLaVA-1.5-7B | 15.3% | 1 frames | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | | 13.7% | 1 frames | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | LanguageBind | 13.3% | 8 frames | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | M3 | 13.3% | 6 frames | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | ImageBind | 12.4% | 2 frames | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | XCLIP | 12% | 8 frames | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | Vicuna7b-1-5 | 10.1% | 0 frames | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | MA-LMM | 9.10% | 4 frames | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 79.8% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | LLaVA-OneVision 72B | 28.1% | 8 frames | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Aria | 25% | 32 frames | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 21.7% | 32 frames | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | MiniCPM-V-2_6 | 20.4% | 1FPS frames | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 19% | 1 frames | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 18.7% | 32 frames | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 18.5% | 0 frames | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 15.5% | 2 frames | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 15.4% | 1 frames | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 13.7% | 1 frames | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official TemporalBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official TemporalBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
No launch post has listed it since May 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2025 | 79.8 | TemporalBench |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2025 | | 79.8 | TemporalBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 78.9 | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%