Benchmark Almanac

TemporalBench

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 35.3% tops its leaderboard LLaVA-OneVision 72B 28.1% leads the models we track
Seed1.5-VL 79.8% leads since May 2025
Dropped

Video models answer about 10K questions on fine-grained temporal dynamics, built from about 2K detailed human annotations of video clips.

The format field is a guess from the question-answer design.

Released
October 2024
Kind
Video understanding
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Last in a launch post
May 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
May 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Understanding fine-grained temporal dynamics is crucial for multimodal video comprehension and generation. Due to the lack of fine-grained temporal annotations, existing video benchmarks mostly resemble static image benchmarks and are incompetent at evaluating models for temporal understanding. In this paper, we introduce TemporalBench, a new benchmark dedicated to evaluating fine-grained temporal understanding in videos. TemporalBench consists of ~10K video question-answer pairs, derived from ~2K high-quality human annotations detailing the temporal dynamics in video clips. As a result, our benchmark provides a unique testbed for evaluating various temporal understanding and reasoning abilities such as action frequency, motion magnitude, event order, etc. Moreover, it enables evaluations on various tasks like both video question answering and captioning, both short and long video understanding, as well as different models such as multimodal video embedding models and text generation models. Results show that state-of-the-art models like GPT-4o achieve only 38.5% question answering accuracy on TemporalBench, demonstrating a significant gap (~30%) between humans and AI in temporal understanding. Furthermore, we notice a critical pitfall for multi-choice QA where LLMs can detect the subtle changes in negative captions and find a centralized description as a cue for its prediction, where we propose Multiple Binary Accuracy (MBA) to correct such bias. We hope that TemporalBench can foster research on improving models' temporal reasoning capabilities. Both dataset and evaluation code will be made available.

Abstract of TemporalBench: Benchmarking Fine-grained Temporal Understanding for Multimodal Video Models (arXiv:2410.10818, CC0)
31
Entries on its own leaderboard, 10 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 35.3%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is LLaVA-OneVision 72B, at 28.1%.

Seed1.5-VL leads with 79.8%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 64 frames 35.3%
  2. 2 LLaVA-Video-72b 16 frames 34.3%
  3. 3 LLaVA-Video-72B 64 frames 33.8%
  4. 4 Qwen2-VL-72B 32 frames 31.7%
  5. 5 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 8 frames 28.1%
  6. 6 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 1FPS frames 25.6%
  7. 7 Aria 32 frames 25%
  8. 8 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 8 frames 24.1%
  9. 9 LLaVA-Video-7B 32 frames 22.9%
  10. 10 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 32 frames 21.7%
  11. 11 LLaVA-NeXT-Video-7B 8 frames 20.5%
  12. 12 MiniCPM-V-2_6 1FPS frames 20.4%
  13. 13 VideoLLaVA 8 frames 20.3%
  14. 14 LLaVA-NeXT-Video-34B 32 frames 19.9%
  15. 15 LLaVA-v1.6-34B 1 frames 19%
  16. 16 LongVU 1FPS frames 18.9%
  17. 17 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 32 frames 18.7%
  18. 18 Flan-T5-XL 0 frames 18.6%
  19. 19 Yi-34B 0 frames 18.5%
  20. 20 InternLM-XC2.5 1FPS frames 16.7%
  21. 21 Flan-T5-XXL 0 frames 15.9%
  22. 22 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 2 frames 15.5%
  23. 23 Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct 1 frames 15.4%
  24. 24 LLaVA-1.5-7B 1 frames 15.3%
  25. 25 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 1 frames 13.7%
  26. 26 LanguageBind 8 frames 13.3%
  27. 27 M3 6 frames 13.3%
  28. 28 ImageBind 2 frames 12.4%
  29. 29 XCLIP 8 frames 12%
  30. 30 Vicuna7b-1-5 0 frames 10.1%
  31. 31 MA-LMM 4 frames 9.10%

Source: Official TemporalBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 35.3% 64 frames Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
2 LLaVA-Video-72b 34.3% 16 frames Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
3 LLaVA-Video-72B 33.8% 64 frames Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2-VL-72B 31.7% 32 frames Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
5 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 28.1% 8 frames Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 25.6% 1FPS frames Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Aria 25% 32 frames Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 24.1% 8 frames Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
9 LLaVA-Video-7B 22.9% 32 frames Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 21.7% 32 frames Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
11 LLaVA-NeXT-Video-7B 20.5% 8 frames Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
12 MiniCPM-V-2_6 20.4% 1FPS frames Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
13 VideoLLaVA 20.3% 8 frames Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
14 LLaVA-NeXT-Video-34B 19.9% 32 frames Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
15 LLaVA-v1.6-34B 19% 1 frames Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
16 LongVU 18.9% 1FPS frames Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
17 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 18.7% 32 frames Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
18 Flan-T5-XL 18.6% 0 frames Official leaderboard
19 Yi-34B 18.5% 0 frames Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
20 InternLM-XC2.5 16.7% 1FPS frames Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
21 Flan-T5-XXL 15.9% 0 frames Official leaderboard
22 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 15.5% 2 frames Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
23 Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct 15.4% 1 frames May 2024 Official leaderboard
24 LLaVA-1.5-7B 15.3% 1 frames Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
25 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 13.7% 1 frames Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
26 LanguageBind 13.3% 8 frames Official leaderboard
27 M3 13.3% 6 frames May 2024 Official leaderboard
28 ImageBind 12.4% 2 frames Official leaderboard
29 XCLIP 12% 8 frames Official leaderboard
30 Vicuna7b-1-5 10.1% 0 frames Official leaderboard
31 MA-LMM 9.10% 4 frames Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed1.5-VL 79.8% May 2025 Lab model card
2 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 28.1% 8 frames Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Aria 25% 32 frames Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 21.7% 32 frames Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
5 MiniCPM-V-2_6 20.4% 1FPS frames Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
6 LLaVA-v1.6-34B 19% 1 frames Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
7 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 18.7% 32 frames Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Yi-34B 18.5% 0 frames Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
9 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 15.5% 2 frames Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct 15.4% 1 frames May 2024 Official leaderboard
11 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 13.7% 1 frames Oct 2023 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Other labs
Own leaderboard Not tested since Oct 2024

Source: Official TemporalBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.5-VL LLaVA-OneVision 72B MiniCPM-V-2_6 LLaVA-v1.6-34B LLaVA-v1.5-13B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.5-VL LLaVA-OneVision 72B

Sources: Official TemporalBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since May 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
May 12, 2025 Seed1.5-VL 79.8 TemporalBench

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
May 11, 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 79.8 TemporalBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 78.9 Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%