UNO-Bench
Models answer 1,250 human-written omni-modal questions and 2,480 uni-modal questions across 44 task types and 5 modality mixes. Multiple choice and multi-step open questions are scored, the open ones by a scoring model.
Most samples are set in a Chinese context.
- Made by
- Meituan
- Released
- October 2025
- Kind
- Audio understanding and voice
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- October 2025, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- December 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Multimodal Large Languages models have been progressing from uni-modal understanding toward unifying visual, audio and language modalities, collectively termed omni models. However, the correlation between uni-modal and omni-modal remains unclear, which requires comprehensive evaluation to drive omni model's intelligence evolution. In this work, we introduce a novel, high-quality, and UNified Omni model benchmark, UNO-Bench. This benchmark is designed to effectively evaluate both UNi-modal and Omni-modal capabilities under a unified ability taxonomy, spanning 44 task types and 5 modality combinations. It includes 1250 human curated samples for omni-modal with 98% cross-modality solvability, and 2480 enhanced uni-modal samples. The human-generated dataset is well-suited to real-world scenarios, particularly within the Chinese context, whereas the automatically compressed dataset offers a 90% increase in speed and maintains 98% consistency across 18 public benchmarks. In addition to traditional multi-choice questions, we propose an innovative multi-step open-ended question format to assess complex reasoning. A general scoring model is incorporated, supporting 6 question types for automated evaluation with 95% accuracy. Experimental result shows the Compositional Law between omni-modal and uni-modal performance and the omni-modal capability manifests as a bottleneck effect on weak models, while exhibiting synergistic promotion on strong models.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 76.5% among models released by December 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 76.5%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 76.5
Gemini 3 Pro
- 71.4
Gemini 3 Flash
- 64.1 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 50.7 Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 46.3
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 41.7 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 39.6
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 30.2
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 27.2 Ming-lite-Omni-1.5
- 26.3 Qwen2.5-Omni-3B
- 26.2 MiniCPM-o-2_6
- 25.4
Baichuan-Omni-1.5
- 1
Gemini 3 Pro 76.5%
- 2
Gemini 3 Flash 71.4%
- 3 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 64.1%
- 4 Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 50.7%
- 5
LongCat-Flash-Omni 46.3%
- 6 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 41.7%
- 7
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 39.6%
- 8
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 30.2%
- 9 Ming-lite-Omni-1.5 27.2%
- 10 Qwen2.5-Omni-3B 26.3%
- 11 MiniCPM-o-2_6 26.2%
- 12
Baichuan-Omni-1.5 25.4%
Source: Official UNO-Bench leaderboard
- 1
Gemini 3 Pro 76.5%
- 2
Gemini 3 Flash 71.4%
- 3
LongCat-Flash-Omni 49.9%
- 4
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 39.6%
- 5
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 30.2%
- 6 MiniCPM-o-2_6 26.2%
- 7
Baichuan-Omni-1.5 25.4%
Sources: Official UNO-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 76.5% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 71.4% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 64.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 50.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | | 46.3% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 41.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | | 39.6% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 30.2% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Ming-lite-Omni-1.5 | 27.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | Qwen2.5-Omni-3B | 26.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | MiniCPM-o-2_6 | 26.2% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 25.4% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 76.5% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 71.4% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 49.9% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 39.6% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 30.2% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | MiniCPM-o-2_6 | 26.2% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 25.4% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in October 2025 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official UNO-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official UNO-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
No launch post has listed it since October 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2025 | 49.9 | UNO-Bench |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2025 | | 49.9 | UNO-Bench (Table 14) | Capabilities |
One lab claim next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 49.9% UNO-Bench | 46.3% Leaderboard | +3.6 pts |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%