Benchmark Almanac

UNO-Bench

Gemini 3 Pro 76.5% leads since November 2025
Gemini 3 Pro 76.5% leads since November 2025
Dropped

Models answer 1,250 human-written omni-modal questions and 2,480 uni-modal questions across 44 task types and 5 modality mixes. Multiple choice and multi-step open questions are scored, the open ones by a scoring model.

Most samples are set in a Chinese context.

Made by
Meituan
Released
October 2025
Kind
Audio understanding and voice
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
October 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
December 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Multimodal Large Languages models have been progressing from uni-modal understanding toward unifying visual, audio and language modalities, collectively termed omni models. However, the correlation between uni-modal and omni-modal remains unclear, which requires comprehensive evaluation to drive omni model's intelligence evolution. In this work, we introduce a novel, high-quality, and UNified Omni model benchmark, UNO-Bench. This benchmark is designed to effectively evaluate both UNi-modal and Omni-modal capabilities under a unified ability taxonomy, spanning 44 task types and 5 modality combinations. It includes 1250 human curated samples for omni-modal with 98% cross-modality solvability, and 2480 enhanced uni-modal samples. The human-generated dataset is well-suited to real-world scenarios, particularly within the Chinese context, whereas the automatically compressed dataset offers a 90% increase in speed and maintains 98% consistency across 18 public benchmarks. In addition to traditional multi-choice questions, we propose an innovative multi-step open-ended question format to assess complex reasoning. A general scoring model is incorporated, supporting 6 question types for automated evaluation with 95% accuracy. Experimental result shows the Compositional Law between omni-modal and uni-modal performance and the omni-modal capability manifests as a bottleneck effect on weak models, while exhibiting synergistic promotion on strong models.

Abstract of UNO-Bench: A Unified Benchmark for Exploring the Compositional Law Between Uni-modal and Omni-modal in Omni Models (arXiv:2510.18915, CC0)
12
Entries on its own leaderboard, 7 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 76.5% among models released by December 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 76.5%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Pro 76.5%
  2. 2 Gemini 3 Flash 71.4%
  3. 3 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 64.1%
  4. 4 Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 50.7%
  5. 5 LongCat-Flash-Omni 46.3%
  6. 6 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 41.7%
  7. 7 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 39.6%
  8. 8 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 30.2%
  9. 9 Ming-lite-Omni-1.5 27.2%
  10. 10 Qwen2.5-Omni-3B 26.3%
  11. 11 MiniCPM-o-2_6 26.2%
  12. 12 Baichuan-Omni-1.5 25.4%

Source: Official UNO-Bench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 76.5% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3 Flash 71.4% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 64.1% Official leaderboard
4 Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 50.7% Official leaderboard
5 LongCat-Flash-Omni 46.3% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 41.7% Official leaderboard
7 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 39.6% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 30.2% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Ming-lite-Omni-1.5 27.2% Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2.5-Omni-3B 26.3% Official leaderboard
11 MiniCPM-o-2_6 26.2% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Baichuan-Omni-1.5 25.4% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 76.5% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3 Flash 71.4% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
3 LongCat-Flash-Omni 49.9% Oct 2025 Lab model card
4 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 39.6% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 30.2% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
6 MiniCPM-o-2_6 26.2% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Baichuan-Omni-1.5 25.4% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in October 2025 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen Meituan Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Dec 2025
Gemini 3 Pro 76.5%

Source: Official UNO-Bench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro LongCat-Flash-Omni Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B Qwen2.5-Omni-7B MiniCPM-o-2_6 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro LongCat-Flash-Omni

Sources: Official UNO-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since October 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Meituan
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 49.9 UNO-Bench

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 49.9 UNO-Bench (Table 14) Capabilities

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
LongCat-Flash-Omni 49.9% UNO-Bench 46.3% Leaderboard +3.6 pts

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%