Vending-Bench
Agents run a simulated vending machine business over long horizons, ordering stock, setting prices, and paying daily fees. Scoring is final net worth in dollars.
Andon Labs deprecated it in November 2025 in favor of Vending-Bench 2.
- Made by
- Andon Labs
- Released
- February 2025
- Kind
- Running a business
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- Kept private
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- July 2025, dropped for a newer version
- Last model added
- November 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
While Large Language Models (LLMs) can exhibit impressive proficiency in isolated, short-term tasks, they often fail to maintain coherent performance over longer time horizons. In this paper, we present Vending-Bench, a simulated environment designed to specifically test an LLM-based agent's ability to manage a straightforward, long-running business scenario: operating a vending machine. Agents must balance inventories, place orders, set prices, and handle daily fees - tasks that are each simple but collectively, over long horizons (>20M tokens per run) stress an LLM's capacity for sustained, coherent decision-making. Our experiments reveal high variance in performance across multiple LLMs: Claude 3.5 Sonnet and o3-mini manage the machine well in most runs and turn a profit, but all models have runs that derail, either through misinterpreting delivery schedules, forgetting orders, or descending into tangential "meltdown" loops from which they rarely recover. We find no clear correlation between failures and the point at which the model's context window becomes full, suggesting that these breakdowns do not stem from memory limits. Apart from highlighting the high variance in performance over long time horizons, Vending-Bench also tests models' ability to acquire capital, a necessity in many hypothetical dangerous AI scenarios. We hope the benchmark can help in preparing for the advent of stronger AI systems.
Grok 4 leads with $4,694 among models released by November 2025
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in November 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Grok 4 $4,694
- 2
Gemini 3 Pro $4,388
- 3 GPT-5 $3,579
- 4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 $2,465
- 5 GPT-5.1 $2,380
- 6 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) $2,218
- 7 Claude Opus 4 $2,077
- 8 o3 $1,843
- 9
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 $789
Source: Official Vending-Bench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grok 4 | $4,694 | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | $4,388 | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-5 | $3,579 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | $2,465 | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-5.1 | $2,380 | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | $2,218 | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4 | $2,077 | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | o3 | $1,843 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | $789 | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in February 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Vending-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official Vending-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs moved on to Vending-Bench 2
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2025 | Grok 4 | 4694.1 | Vending-Bench net worth |
One lab claim next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.
Versions
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Claude Fable 5 75.9%
- OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%