TriviaQA
Trivia questions with evidence documents. Scored by exact match.
Saturated base-model metric.
- Made by
- University of Washington
- Released
- May 2017
- Kind
- Trivia and open questions
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
DeepSeek-V4-Pro #69 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- April 2026, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We present TriviaQA, a challenging reading comprehension dataset containing over 650K question-answer-evidence triples. TriviaQA includes 95K question-answer pairs authored by trivia enthusiasts and independently gathered evidence documents, six per question on average, that provide high quality distant supervision for answering the questions. We show that, in comparison to other recently introduced large-scale datasets, TriviaQA (1) has relatively complex, compositional questions, (2) has considerable syntactic and lexical variability between questions and corresponding answer-evidence sentences, and (3) requires more cross sentence reasoning to find answers. We also present two baseline algorithms: a feature-based classifier and a state-of-the-art neural network, that performs well on SQuAD reading comprehension. Neither approach comes close to human performance (23% and 40% vs. 80%), suggesting that TriviaQA is a challenging testbed that is worth significant future study. Data and code available at – http://nlp.cs.washington.edu/triviaqa/
Llama 3.1-405B leads with 91.8%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Llama 3.1-405B leads with 91.8%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 91.8
Llama 3.1-405B
- 91.0 Sarvam-M
- 89.8
Llama 3.1-70B
- 89.7
Llama 3-70B
- 87.6
Llama 2-70B
- 87.5 Claude 2
- 86.7
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
- 86.6 Beam 1.0 Base
- 86.1 PaLM 2-L
- 85.6
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 85.5
Gemma 3 27B
- 84.5
Llama 2-34B
- 83.7
Gemma 2 27B
- 82.9
DeepSeek-V3
- 82.7
Mistral Large
- 81.5
DeepSeek LLM 67B
- 80.9 GLM-5
- 80.3
Mistral Small 3
- 80.0 GLM-4.5
- 79.6
Llama 2-13B
- 78.6
Ring-1T
- 78.5
Llama 3-8B
- 78.2
Gemma 3 12B
- 77.6
Llama 3.1-8B
- 76.6
Gemma 2 9B
- 75.6
phi-3-medium 14B
- 74.8
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 72.1
Llama 2-7B
- 71.5
Mixtral 8x7B
- 70.2
Gemma 3n E4B
- 69.9
Mistral 7B v0.1
- 66.3 Moonlight-16B-A3B
- 65.8
Gemma 3 4B
- 64.0
phi-3-mini 3.8B
- 63.4
Gemma 7B
- 58.1
phi-3-small 7.4B
- 53.2
Gemma 2B
- 47.7
AFM-4.5B
- 39.8
Gemma 3 1B
- 33.6
BitNet b1.58 2B4T
- 1
Llama 3.1-405B 91.8%
- 2 Sarvam-M 91%
- 3
Llama 3.1-70B 89.8%
- 4
Llama 3-70B 89.7%
- 5
Llama 2-70B 87.6%
- 6 Claude 2 87.5%
- 7
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) 86.7%
- 8 Beam 1.0 Base 86.6%
- 9 PaLM 2-L 86.1%
- 10
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 85.6%
- 11
Gemma 3 27B 85.5%
- 12
Llama 2-34B 84.5%
- 13
Gemma 2 27B 83.7%
- 14
DeepSeek-V3 82.9%
- 15
Mistral Large 82.7%
- 16
DeepSeek LLM 67B 81.5%
- 17 GLM-5 80.9%
- 18
Mistral Small 3 80.3%
- 19 GLM-4.5 80%
- 20
Llama 2-13B 79.6%
- 21
Ring-1T 78.6%
- 22
Llama 3-8B 78.5%
- 23
Gemma 3 12B 78.2%
- 24
Llama 3.1-8B 77.6%
- 25
Gemma 2 9B 76.6%
- 26
phi-3-medium 14B 75.6%
- 27
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 74.8%
- 28
Llama 2-7B 72.1%
- 29
Mixtral 8x7B 71.5%
- 30
Gemma 3n E4B 70.2%
- 31
Mistral 7B v0.1 69.9%
- 32 Moonlight-16B-A3B 66.3%
- 33
Gemma 3 4B 65.8%
- 34
phi-3-mini 3.8B 64%
- 35
Gemma 7B 63.4%
- 36
phi-3-small 7.4B 58.1%
- 37
Gemma 2B 53.2%
- 38
AFM-4.5B 47.7%
- 39
Gemma 3 1B 39.8%
- 40
BitNet b1.58 2B4T 33.6%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 91.8
Llama 3.1-405B
- 91.0 Sarvam-M
- 89.8
Llama 3.1-70B
- 89.7
Llama 3-70B
- 87.6
Llama 2-70B
- 87.5 Claude 2
- 86.7 Claude 1.3
- 86.7
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
- 86.6 Beam 1.0 Base
- 86.1 PaLM 2-L
- 86.0
LLaMA-65B
- 85.8 GPT-3.5 Turbo
- 85.6
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 85.5
Gemma 3 27B
- 84.8 GPT-4
- 84.6
Llama 2-34B
- 83.8
LLaMA-33B
- 83.7
Gemma 2 27B
- 82.9
DeepSeek-V3
- 82.7
Mistral Large
- 82.2
Mixtral 8x7B
- 81.7 PaLM 2-M
- 81.5
DeepSeek LLM 67B
- 81.4
PaLM (540B)
- 80.9 GLM-5
- 80.3
Mistral Small 3
- 80.0 GLM-4.5
- 79.9
Falcon-40B
- 79.6
Llama 2-13B
- 78.9 Claude Instant
- 78.6
Ring-1T
- 78.5
Llama 3-8B
- 78.2
Gemma 3 12B
- 77.9
LLaMA-13B
- 77.6
Llama 3.1-8B
- 76.6
Gemma 2 9B
- 75.8
GLaM
- 75.6
phi-3-medium 14B
- 75.2 PaLM 2-S
- 75.2
Mistral 7B v0.1
- 74.8
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 73.7
Llama 2-7B
- 73.6
MPT-30B
- 72.3
Gemma 7B
- 71.9
Qwen2.5-72B
- 71.2 InstructGPT 175B
- 71.0
LLaMA-7B
- 70.2
Gemma 3n E4B
- 66.3 Moonlight-16B-A3B
- 65.8
Gemma 3 4B
- 64.6
Chinchilla
- 64.6
Falcon-7B
- 64.0
phi-3-mini 3.8B
- 61.6
MPT-7B
- 58.1
phi-3-small 7.4B
- 57.2
Gopher (280B)
- 53.2
Gemma 2B
- 47.7
AFM-4.5B
- 45.2
Phi-2
- 39.8
Gemma 3 1B
- 33.6
BitNet b1.58 2B4T
- 1
Llama 3.1-405B 91.8%
- 2 Sarvam-M 91%
- 3
Llama 3.1-70B 89.8%
- 4
Llama 3-70B 89.7%
- 5
Llama 2-70B 87.6%
- 6 Claude 2 87.5%
- 7 Claude 1.3 86.7%
- 8
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) 86.7%
- 9 Beam 1.0 Base 86.6%
- 10 PaLM 2-L 86.1%
- 11
LLaMA-65B 86%
- 12 GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 85.8%
- 13
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 85.6%
- 14
Gemma 3 27B 85.5%
- 15 GPT-4 Jun 2023 84.8%
- 16
Llama 2-34B 84.6%
- 17
LLaMA-33B 83.8%
- 18
Gemma 2 27B 83.7%
- 19
DeepSeek-V3 82.9%
- 20
Mistral Large 82.7%
- 21
Mixtral 8x7B 82.2%
- 22 PaLM 2-M 81.7%
- 23
DeepSeek LLM 67B 81.5%
- 24
PaLM (540B) 81.4%
- 25 GLM-5 80.9%
- 26
Mistral Small 3 80.3%
- 27 GLM-4.5 80%
- 28
Falcon-40B 79.9%
- 29
Llama 2-13B 79.6%
- 30 Claude Instant 78.9%
- 31
Ring-1T 78.6%
- 32
Llama 3-8B 78.5%
- 33
Gemma 3 12B 78.2%
- 34
LLaMA-13B 77.9%
- 35
Llama 3.1-8B 77.6%
- 36
Gemma 2 9B 76.6%
- 37
GLaM 75.8%
- 38
phi-3-medium 14B 75.6%
- 39 PaLM 2-S 75.2%
- 40
Mistral 7B v0.1 75.2%
- 41
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 74.8%
- 42
Llama 2-7B 73.7%
- 43
MPT-30B 73.6%
- 44
Gemma 7B 72.3%
- 45
Qwen2.5-72B 71.9%
- 46 InstructGPT 175B 71.2%
- 47
LLaMA-7B 71%
- 48
Gemma 3n E4B 70.2%
- 49 Moonlight-16B-A3B 66.3%
- 50
Gemma 3 4B 65.8%
- 51
Chinchilla 64.6%
- 52
Falcon-7B 64.6%
- 53
phi-3-mini 3.8B 64%
- 54
MPT-7B 61.6%
- 55
phi-3-small 7.4B 58.1%
- 56
Gopher (280B) 57.2%
- 57
Gemma 2B 53.2%
- 58
AFM-4.5B 47.7%
- 59
Phi-2 45.2%
- 60
Gemma 3 1B 39.8%
- 61
BitNet b1.58 2B4T 33.6%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and Another board, via Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 91.8% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Sarvam-M | 91% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 89.8% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 89.7% | Apr 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 87.6% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | Claude 2 | 87.5% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 86.7% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | Beam 1.0 Base | 86.6% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | PaLM 2-L | 86.1% | May 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 85.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 85.5% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 84.5% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 83.7% | Jun 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 82.9% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 82.7% | Feb 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 81.5% | Nov 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | GLM-5 | 80.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 80.3% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | GLM-4.5 | 80% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 79.6% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 78.6% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 78.5% | Apr 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 78.2% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 77.6% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 76.6% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 75.6% | Apr 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | | 74.8% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | | 72.1% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | | 71.5% | Dec 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | | 70.2% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 31 | | 69.9% | Sep 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 32 | Moonlight-16B-A3B | 66.3% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 33 | | 65.8% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 34 | | 64% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 35 | | 63.4% | Feb 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 36 | | 58.1% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 37 | | 53.2% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 38 | | 47.7% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 39 | | 39.8% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 40 | | 33.6% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 91.8% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Sarvam-M | 91% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 89.8% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 89.7% | Apr 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 87.6% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | Claude 2 | 87.5% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | Claude 1.3 | 86.7% | Apr 2023 | Claim in Model Card and Evaluations for Claude Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 8 | | 86.7% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | Beam 1.0 Base | 86.6% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | PaLM 2-L | 86.1% | May 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 86% | Feb 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 12 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 | 85.8% | Nov 2023 | Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI | |
| 13 | | 85.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 85.5% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | GPT-4 Jun 2023 | 84.8% | Jun 2023 | Collected by Epoch AI, source not named | |
| 16 | | 84.6% | Jul 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 17 | | 83.8% | Feb 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 18 | | 83.7% | Jun 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 82.9% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 82.7% | Feb 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 82.2% | Dec 2023 | Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI | |
| 22 | PaLM 2-M | 81.7% | May 2023 | Claim in PaLM 2 Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 23 | | 81.5% | Nov 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 81.4% | Apr 2022 | Claim in PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways, via Epoch AI | |
| 25 | GLM-5 | 80.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 80.3% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | GLM-4.5 | 80% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | | 79.9% | Mar 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 29 | | 79.6% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | Claude Instant | 78.9% | Aug 2023 | Claim in Model Card and Evaluations for Claude Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 31 | | 78.6% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 32 | | 78.5% | Apr 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 33 | | 78.2% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 34 | | 77.9% | Feb 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 35 | | 77.6% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 36 | | 76.6% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 37 | | 75.8% | Dec 2021 | Claim in GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-o…, via Epoch AI | |
| 38 | | 75.6% | Apr 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 39 | PaLM 2-S | 75.2% | May 2023 | Claim in PaLM 2 Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 40 | | 75.2% | Sep 2023 | Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI | |
| 41 | | 74.8% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 42 | | 73.7% | Jul 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 43 | | 73.6% | Jun 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 44 | | 72.3% | Feb 2024 | Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI | |
| 45 | | 71.9% | Sep 2024 | Claim in DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| 46 | InstructGPT 175B | 71.2% | Jan 2022 | Claim in Language Models are Few-Shot Learners, via Epoch AI | |
| 47 | | 71% | Feb 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 48 | | 70.2% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 49 | Moonlight-16B-A3B | 66.3% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 50 | | 65.8% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 51 | | 64.6% | Mar 2022 | Claim in LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 52 | | 64.6% | Apr 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 53 | | 64% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 54 | | 61.6% | May 2023 | Claim in Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 55 | | 58.1% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 56 | | 57.2% | Dec 2021 | Claim in LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models, via Epoch AI | |
| 57 | | 53.2% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 58 | | 47.7% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 59 | | 45.2% | Dec 2023 | Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI | |
| 60 | | 39.8% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 61 | | 33.6% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card |
Epoch AI collected claims for 38 models from labs’ reports and papers. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
5 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023 7 models have held number one with claims included since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
A claim for LLaMA-65B that Epoch AI collected passed 85% in February 2023
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Labs’ model cards and claims collected by Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)
Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | 85.6 | TriviaQA (EM) | |
| Jul 29, 2025 | 47.7 | TriviaQA | |
| Jun 26, 2025 | 70.2 | TriviaQA 5-shot (PT) | |
| May 23, 2025 | Sarvam-M | 91 | TriviaQA (0.91) |
| Apr 15, 2025 | 33.6 | TriviaQA | |
| Mar 12, 2025 | 85.5 | TriviaQA 5-shot (PT) | |
| Feb 22, 2025 | Moonlight-16B-A3B | 66.3 | TriviaQA |
| Jan 30, 2025 | 80.3 | TriviaQA (5-shot) [base; listed twice, 80.32 and 76.6] | |
| Dec 26, 2024 | 82.9 | TriviaQA (EM) | |
| Jun 27, 2024 | 83.7 | TriviaQA (5-shot) | |
| Apr 22, 2024 | 75.6 | TriviaQA (5-Shot) | |
| Apr 18, 2024 | 89.7 | TriviaQA-Wiki (5-shot) [pretrained] | |
| Feb 26, 2024 | 82.7 | TriQA (5-shot) | |
| Feb 21, 2024 | 63.4 | TriviaQA (5-shot) | |
| Dec 11, 2023 | 71.5 | TriQA [detailed table] | |
| Nov 29, 2023 | 81.5 | TriviaQA | |
| Sep 27, 2023 | 69.9 | TriviaQA | |
| Jul 11, 2023 | Claude 2 | 87.5 | TriviaQA (5-shot) |
| May 10, 2023 | 86.1 | TriviaQA (EM), 1-shot |
32 system cards report it, from 10 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2026 | Beam 1.0 Base technical report | 86.6 | TriviaQA, 5-shot greedy, Table 23 | Capabilities |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GLM-5 technical report | 80.9 | GLM-5-Base, TriviaQA (EM) (Table 11) | Capabilities |
| Oct 21, 2025 | | 78.6 | TriviaQA (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| Aug 25, 2025 | | 74.8 | TriviaQA, OpenCompass (Table 14) | Capabilities |
| Aug 8, 2025 | GLM-4.5 technical report | 80 | GLM-4.5-Base, TriviaQA (EM) (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 17, 2025 | | Trivia QA 5-shot, text-only, chart without printed numbers (Figure 6). Speech-synthesized Trivia QA* 79.4 (Table 8) | Capabilities | |
| Apr 16, 2025 | | 33.6 | TriviaQA (5-shot; EM) (Table 1, Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 65.8 | TriviaQA (TQA), PT, 5-shot (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 85.5 | TriviaQA (TQA), PT, 5-shot (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 39.8 | TriviaQA (TQA), PT, 5-shot (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 78.2 | TriviaQA (TQA), PT, 5-shot (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 58.1 | TriviaQA (5-Shot) (Section 3 table) | Capabilities |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 64 | TriviaQA (5-Shot) (Section 3 table) | Capabilities |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 73.9 | TriviaQA (5-Shot) (Section 3 table) | Capabilities |
| Jul 31, 2024 | | 76.6 | TriviaQA, PT, 5-shot (Table 13) | Capabilities |
| Jul 31, 2024 | | 83.7 | TriviaQA, PT, 5-shot (Table 13) | Capabilities |
| Jul 23, 2024 | | 77.6 | TriviaQA-Wiki, 5-shot, em, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) | Capabilities |
| Jul 23, 2024 | | 89.8 | TriviaQA-Wiki, 5-shot, em, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) | Capabilities |
| Jul 23, 2024 | | 91.8 | TriviaQA-Wiki, 5-shot, em, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) | Capabilities |
| May 7, 2024 | | 86.7 | TriviaQA 5-shot, DeepSeek-V2 Chat (RL) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Apr 18, 2024 | | 78.5 | TriviaQA-Wiki (5-shot), pretrained (Base pretrained models table) | Capabilities |
| Apr 18, 2024 | | 89.7 | TriviaQA-Wiki (5-shot), pretrained (Base pretrained models table) | Capabilities |
| Mar 13, 2024 | | 63.4 | TriviaQA, PT, 5-shot (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Mar 13, 2024 | | 53.2 | TriviaQA, PT, 5-shot (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jan 8, 2024 | | 71.5 | TriQA, 5-shot, no Wikipedia contexts (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jan 5, 2024 | | 81.5 | TriviaQA, DeepSeek 67B Chat (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Oct 10, 2023 | | 69.9 | TriviaQA, 5-shot, no Wikipedia contexts (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 72.1 | TriviaQA (Wiki), exact match, 5-shot, pretrained (Table 22). 1-shot = 68.9 | Capabilities |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 87.6 | TriviaQA (Wiki), exact match, 5-shot, pretrained (Table 22). 1-shot = 85.0 | Capabilities |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 84.5 | TriviaQA (Wiki), exact match, 5-shot, pretrained (Table 22). 1-shot = 83.3 | Capabilities |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 79.6 | TriviaQA (Wiki), exact match, 5-shot, pretrained (Table 22). 1-shot = 77.2 | Capabilities |
| Jul 11, 2023 | Claude 2 model card | 87.5 | TriviaQA (5-shot) (4.3) | Capabilities |
More in Knowledge
- MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects.
Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
- SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
- WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1.
Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
- BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly.
Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
- KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry.
Solar Pro 4 79.2%
- HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed.
Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%