Arena-Hard v2.0
Models answer 500 hard real user prompts from Chatbot Arena and 250 creative writing prompts. GPT-4.1 or Gemini 2.5 judges each answer against a baseline answer from o3-mini, and the score is the win rate.
Released on April 23rd, 2025 with new prompts, new judges and a new baseline (o3-mini at 50.0). Scores are not comparable with Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1. Labs often report the hard prompt split only.
- Made by
- Arena (formerly LMArena)
- Released
- April 2025
- Kind
- Overall chat quality
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- o3 #83 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has outpaced the development of model evaluation, highlighting the need for continuous curation of new, challenging benchmarks. However, manual curation of high-quality, human-aligned benchmarks is expensive and time-consuming. To address this, we introduce BenchBuilder, an automated pipeline that leverages LLMs to curate high-quality, open-ended prompts from large, crowd-sourced datasets, enabling continuous benchmark updates without human in the loop. We apply BenchBuilder to datasets such as Chatbot Arena and WildChat-1M, extracting challenging prompts and utilizing LLM-as-a-Judge for automatic model evaluation. To validate benchmark quality, we propose new metrics to measure a benchmark's alignment with human preferences and ability to separate models. We release Arena-Hard-Auto, a benchmark consisting 500 challenging prompts curated by BenchBuilder. Arena-Hard-Auto provides 3x higher separation of model performances compared to MT-Bench and achieves 98.6% correlation with human preference rankings, all at a cost of $20. Our work sets a new framework for the scalable curation of automated benchmarks from extensive data.
Qwen3-Max leads with 90.2% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
o3 leads with 85.9% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Qwen3-Max leads with 90.2%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 90.2
Qwen3-Max
- 86.5
LongCat-Flash-Chat
- 83.5
Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B
- 81.6
Ring-1T
- 79.7
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking
- 74.8
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 74.8
Solar Open 100B
- 74.7
Solar Pro 3 (March 2026 update)
- 74.0
Step 3.5 Flash
- 73.9
Nemotron 3 Super
- 71.0 Sarvam 105B
- 69.9
LongCat-Flash-Thinking
- 67.9 Granite 4.2 30B
- 67.7
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B
- 62.5
Solar Pro 3
- 62.3
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B
- 58.6
STEP3-VL-10B
- 55.1
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 54.5 Kimi K2
- 54.1 MiMo-V2-Flash
- 49.0 Sarvam 30B
- 46.2
Solar Pro 2
- 45.8
Baichuan-M2-32B
- 43.1
Mistral Small 3.2
- 1
Qwen3-Max 90.2%
- 2
LongCat-Flash-Chat 86.5%
- 3
Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 83.5%
- 4
Ring-1T 81.6%
- 5
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 79.7%
- 6
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 74.8%
- 7
Solar Open 100B 74.8%
- 8
Solar Pro 3 (March 2026 update) 74.7%
- 9
Step 3.5 Flash 74%
- 10
Nemotron 3 Super 73.9%
- 11 Sarvam 105B 71%
- 12
LongCat-Flash-Thinking 69.9%
- 13 Granite 4.2 30B 67.9%
- 14
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 67.7%
- 15
Solar Pro 3 62.5%
- 16
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B 62.3%
- 17
STEP3-VL-10B 58.6%
- 18
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 55.1%
- 19 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 54.5%
- 20 MiMo-V2-Flash 54.1%
- 21 Sarvam 30B 49%
- 22
Solar Pro 2 46.2%
- 23
Baichuan-M2-32B 45.8%
- 24
Mistral Small 3.2 43.1%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 85.9 o3
- 79.1 o4-mini
- 79.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 68.6
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 66.1 o3-mini
- 61.0 o1
- 59.8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 58.4
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- 58.0
DeepSeek-R1
- 50.0 GPT-4.5
- 50.0 GPT-4.1
- 46.9 GPT-4.1 mini
- 44.5
Qwen3-32B
- 43.5
QwQ-32B
- 33.9
Qwen3-30B-A3B
- 33.0 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 17.2
Llama 4 Maverick
- 16.4
Athene-V2-Chat
- 15.0
Gemma 3 27B
- 15.0
Qwen3-4B
- 13.7 GPT-4.1 nano
- 10.3
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct
- 10.1
Qwen2.5-72B
- 1 o3 85.9%
- 2 o4-mini high 79.1%
- 3
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 79%
- 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025 68.6%
- 5 o3-mini high 66.1%
- 6 o1 high 61%
- 7 Claude 3.7 Sonnet thinking 16k 59.8%
- 8
Qwen3-235B-A22B 58.4%
- 9
DeepSeek-R1 58%
- 10 GPT-4.5 50%
- 11 GPT-4.1 50%
- 12 GPT-4.1 mini 46.9%
- 13
Qwen3-32B 44.5%
- 14
QwQ-32B 43.5%
- 15
Qwen3-30B-A3B 33.9%
- 16 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 33%
- 17
Llama 4 Maverick 17.2%
- 18
Athene-V2-Chat 16.4%
- 19
Gemma 3 27B 15%
- 20
Qwen3-4B 15%
- 21 GPT-4.1 nano 13.7%
- 22
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct 10.3%
- 23
Qwen2.5-72B 10.1%
Source: Official Arena-Hard v2.0 leaderboard
- 90.2
Qwen3-Max
- 86.5
LongCat-Flash-Chat
- 85.9 o3
- 83.5
Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B
- 81.6
Ring-1T
- 79.7
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking
- 79.1 o4-mini
- 79.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 74.8
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 74.8
Solar Open 100B
- 74.7
Solar Pro 3 (March 2026 update)
- 74.0
Step 3.5 Flash
- 73.9
Nemotron 3 Super
- 71.0 Sarvam 105B
- 69.9
LongCat-Flash-Thinking
- 68.6
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 67.9 Granite 4.2 30B
- 67.7
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B
- 66.1 o3-mini
- 62.5
Solar Pro 3
- 62.3
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B
- 61.0 o1
- 59.8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 58.6
STEP3-VL-10B
- 58.4
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- 58.0
DeepSeek-R1
- 55.1
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 54.5 Kimi K2
- 54.1 MiMo-V2-Flash
- 50.0 GPT-4.5
- 50.0 GPT-4.1
- 49.0 Sarvam 30B
- 46.9 GPT-4.1 mini
- 46.2
Solar Pro 2
- 45.8
Baichuan-M2-32B
- 44.5
Qwen3-32B
- 43.5
QwQ-32B
- 43.1
Mistral Small 3.2
- 33.9
Qwen3-30B-A3B
- 33.0 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 17.2
Llama 4 Maverick
- 16.4
Athene-V2-Chat
- 15.0
Gemma 3 27B
- 15.0
Qwen3-4B
- 13.7 GPT-4.1 nano
- 10.3
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct
- 10.1
Qwen2.5-72B
- 1
Qwen3-Max 90.2%
- 2
LongCat-Flash-Chat 86.5%
- 3 o3 85.9%
- 4
Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 83.5%
- 5
Ring-1T 81.6%
- 6
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 79.7%
- 7 o4-mini high 79.1%
- 8
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 79%
- 9
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 74.8%
- 10
Solar Open 100B 74.8%
- 11
Solar Pro 3 (March 2026 update) 74.7%
- 12
Step 3.5 Flash 74%
- 13
Nemotron 3 Super 73.9%
- 14 Sarvam 105B 71%
- 15
LongCat-Flash-Thinking 69.9%
- 16
Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025 68.6%
- 17 Granite 4.2 30B 67.9%
- 18
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 67.7%
- 19 o3-mini high 66.1%
- 20
Solar Pro 3 62.5%
- 21
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B 62.3%
- 22 o1 high 61%
- 23 Claude 3.7 Sonnet thinking 16k 59.8%
- 24
STEP3-VL-10B 58.6%
- 25
Qwen3-235B-A22B 58.4%
- 26
DeepSeek-R1 58%
- 27
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 55.1%
- 28 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 54.5%
- 29 MiMo-V2-Flash 54.1%
- 30 GPT-4.5 50%
- 31 GPT-4.1 50%
- 32 Sarvam 30B 49%
- 33 GPT-4.1 mini 46.9%
- 34
Solar Pro 2 46.2%
- 35
Baichuan-M2-32B 45.8%
- 36
Qwen3-32B 44.5%
- 37
QwQ-32B 43.5%
- 38
Mistral Small 3.2 43.1%
- 39
Qwen3-30B-A3B 33.9%
- 40 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 33%
- 41
Llama 4 Maverick 17.2%
- 42
Athene-V2-Chat 16.4%
- 43
Gemma 3 27B 15%
- 44
Qwen3-4B 15%
- 45 GPT-4.1 nano 13.7%
- 46
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct 10.3%
- 47
Qwen2.5-72B 10.1%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official Arena-Hard v2.0 leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 90.2% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 86.5% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 83.5% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 81.6% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 79.7% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 74.8% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 74.8% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 74.7% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 74% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 73.9% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | Sarvam 105B | 71% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 69.9% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | Granite 4.2 30B | 67.9% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 67.7% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 62.5% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 62.3% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 58.6% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 55.1% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 54.5% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | MiMo-V2-Flash | 54.1% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | Sarvam 30B | 49% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 46.2% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 45.8% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 43.1% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | o3 | 85.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | o4-mini | 79.1% | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 79% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 68.6% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | o3-mini | 66.1% | high | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | o1 | 61% | high | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 59.8% | thinking 16k | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 58.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 58% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | GPT-4.5 | 50% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | GPT-4.1 | 50% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | GPT-4.1 mini | 46.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 44.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 43.5% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 33.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 33% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 17.2% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 16.4% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 15% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 15% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | GPT-4.1 nano | 13.7% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 10.3% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 10.1% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 90.2% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 86.5% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | o3 | 85.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 83.5% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 81.6% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 79.7% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | o4-mini | 79.1% | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 79% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 74.8% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 74.8% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 74.7% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 74% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 73.9% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | Sarvam 105B | 71% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 69.9% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 68.6% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Granite 4.2 30B | 67.9% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 67.7% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | o3-mini | 66.1% | high | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 62.5% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 62.3% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | o1 | 61% | high | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 59.8% | thinking 16k | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | | 58.6% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 58.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 58% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 55.1% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 54.5% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | MiMo-V2-Flash | 54.1% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | GPT-4.5 | 50% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | GPT-4.1 | 50% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | Sarvam 30B | 49% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 33 | GPT-4.1 mini | 46.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 46.2% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 35 | | 45.8% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 36 | | 44.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | | 43.5% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | | 43.1% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 39 | | 33.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 33% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 17.2% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | | 16.4% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | | 15% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | | 15% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | GPT-4.1 nano | 13.7% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | | 10.3% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | | 10.1% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 25 entries, 23 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official Arena-Hard v2.0 leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| o3 | 85.9% | ||||
| o4-mini | high | 79.1% | |||
| | 79% | ||||
| o4-mini | 74.6% | ||||
| | 68.6% | ||||
| o3-mini | high | 66.1% | |||
| o1 | high | 61% | |||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | thinking 16k | 59.8% | |||
| | 58.4% | ||||
| | 58% | ||||
| o1 | 55.9% | ||||
| o3-mini | 50% | ||||
| GPT-4.5 | 50% | ||||
| GPT-4.1 | 50% | ||||
| GPT-4.1 mini | 46.9% | ||||
| | 44.5% | ||||
| | 43.5% | ||||
| | 33.9% | ||||
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 33% | ||||
| | 17.2% | ||||
| | 16.4% | ||||
| | 15% | ||||
| | 15% | ||||
| GPT-4.1 nano | 13.7% | ||||
| | 10.3% | ||||
| | 10.1% |
6 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in April 2025 2 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in April 2025 4 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
O3 on the official leaderboard passed 85% in April 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official Arena-Hard v2.0 leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in August 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2026 | Granite 4.2 30B | 67.9 | Arena-Hard-V2 |
| Mar 24, 2026 | 74.7 | Arena-hard-v2 | |
| Mar 19, 2026 | 83.5 | ArenaHard v2 (Avg.); Hard Prompt 88.2, Creative Writing 78.7 | |
| Mar 11, 2026 | 73.9 | Arena-Hard-V2 | |
| Mar 6, 2026 | Sarvam 30B | 49 | Arena Hard v2 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | Sarvam 105B | 71 | Arena Hard v2 |
| Jan 26, 2026 | 62.5 | Arena Hard v2 | |
| Jan 23, 2026 | 90.2 | Arena-Hard v2 | |
| Dec 31, 2025 | 74.8 | Arena Hard v2 | |
| Dec 16, 2025 | MiMo-V2-Flash | 54.1 | Arena-Hard (Hard Prompt) 54.1, Creative Writing 86.2 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | 67.7 | Arena-Hard-V2 (Average); Hard Prompt 72.1, Creative Writing 63.2 | |
| Oct 10, 2025 | 81.6 | Arena-Hard-v2.0 (win-rate) | |
| Sep 22, 2025 | 55.1 | Arena-Hard v2 (Thinking variant) | |
| Sep 21, 2025 | 69.9 | Arena-Hard(hard prompt gemini) | |
| Sep 11, 2025 | 62.3 | Arena-Hard v2* (win rate judged by GPT-4.1) | |
| Aug 29, 2025 | 86.5 | ArenaHard-V2(acc) | |
| Aug 10, 2025 | 45.8 | Arena-Hard-v2.0 | |
| Jul 25, 2025 | 79.7 | Arena-Hard v2$ | |
| Jul 10, 2025 | 46.2 | Arena-Hard-v2.0 | |
| Jun 20, 2025 | 43.1 | Arena Hard v2 |
14 system cards report it, from 9 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | | 83.5 | ArenaHard v2 (Avg.) (Table 1). Hard Prompt 88.2, Creative Writing 78.7 | Capabilities |
| Mar 11, 2026 | | 73.9 | Arena-Hard-V2 (Hard Prompt) (Tables 5 and 8) | Capabilities |
| Feb 11, 2026 | | 74 | Arena-Hard-v2.0, GPT-4.1 judge (Table 5). PaCoRe 93.1 | Capabilities |
| Jan 14, 2026 | | 58.6 | Arena-Hard-V2, SeRe (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jan 11, 2026 | | 74.8 | Arena Hard v2 (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jan 6, 2026 | MiMo-V2-Flash technical report | 54.1 | Arena-Hard (Hard Prompt) 54.1, Arena-Hard (Creative Writing) 86.2 (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Dec 23, 2025 | | 67.7 | Arena-Hard-V2 (Average), GPT-4.1 judge (Table 3). Hard Prompt 72.10, Creative Writing 63.20 | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 74.8 | Arena-Hard V2 (winrate) (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Oct 21, 2025 | | 81.6 | ArenaHard v2 (win-rate) (Table 1). ArenaHard v2 (Elo) 84.52 | Capabilities |
| Sep 23, 2025 | | 69.9 | Arena-Hard(hard prompt gemini) (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2025 | | 55.1 | Arena-Hard v2, Thinking only (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Sep 2, 2025 | | 45.8 | Arena-Hard-V2.0 (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| Sep 1, 2025 | | 86.5 | ArenaHard-V2 (acc) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Jul 21, 2025 | Kimi K2 technical report | 54.5 | Arena Hard v2.0 Hard Prompt (Win rate). Creative Writing (Win rate) 85.0 (Table 3) | Capabilities |
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
Source: Labs’ model cards
More in Instructions and chat
- IFEval In use Models answer about 500 prompts containing verifiable instructions such as word limits or required keywords. Code checks each instruction for strict and loose accuracy.
Gemma 4 31B IT 98.9%
- IFBench In use 58 new out-of-domain verifiable output constraints. Scored by programmatic constraint checks (strict or loose).
Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9%
- MultiChallenge In use Multi-turn conversations testing instruction retention, inference memory, versioned editing and self-coherence. Graded by LLM judge with rubrics. GPT-6.1 Sol 82%
- Multi-IF In use Models follow verifiable instructions over three-turn conversations in eight languages, extending IFEval. Scored by instruction accuracy at each turn. LFM3-1.7B 89.1%
- AdvancedIF In use Models respond to over 1,600 prompts with complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. A judge model checks each response against expert-written rubrics.
MAI-Thinking-1 85%
- IFStruct In use Models generate JSON or YAML that must follow a requested schema and phrasing constraints, without constrained decoding. A response passes only if every structural constraint holds.
Gemma 4 31B IT 95.9%