Benchmark Almanac

Agentic BAIM-LLM Evaluation (ABLE)

Gemini 3.1 Pro 84.6% leads since February 2026
Not in model cards

Agents run a viral-protein redesign workflow. Nine tasks cover structure retrieval, design strategy, tool selection and biological AI model use. Outputs are auto-scored.

Developed by SecureBio in 2025. Not public. Three of nine tasks have expert baselines. Many frontier closed models refuse all tasks.

Made by
SecureBio
Kind
Hazardous knowledge
Level
Research frontier
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.5 Pro #14 on the capability index
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026
20
Entries on its own leaderboard, 18 models we track

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads with 84.6%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

20 entries. Scroll sideways for the rest.

  1. 84.6 Gemini 3.1 Pro
  2. 83.6 GPT-5.5 Pro
  3. 82.5 Kimi K2.5
  4. 78.4 Kimi K3
  5. 76.7 GLM-5.2
  6. 74.7 Gemini 3 Pro
  7. 65.3 Mistral Large 4
  8. 62.5 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
  9. 59.9 Inkling
  10. 57.5 Inkling-Small
  11. 51.7 gpt-oss-120b
  12. 50.5 Beam 1.0
  13. 49.1 Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
  14. 48.1 Kimi K2 Thinking
  15. 45.2 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking
  16. 42.9 Kimi K2.6
  17. 24.2 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B
  18. 23.8 DeepSeek-V3.2
  19. 0.0 Claude Sonnet 4.6
  20. 0.0 Claude Opus 4.8
  1. 1 Gemini 3.1 Pro high 84.6%
  2. 2 GPT-5.5 Pro xhigh 83.6%
  3. 3 Kimi K2.5 82.5%
  4. 4 Kimi K3 max 78.4%
  5. 5 GLM-5.2 max 76.7%
  6. 6 Gemini 3 Pro high 74.7%
  7. 7 Mistral Large 4 high 65.3%
  8. 8 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B 62.5%
  9. 9 Inkling xhigh 59.9%
  10. 10 Inkling-Small xhigh 57.5%
  11. 11 gpt-oss-120b 51.7%
  12. 12 Beam 1.0 max 50.5%
  13. 13 Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 49.1%
  14. 14 Kimi K2 Thinking 48.1%
  15. 15 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 45.2%
  16. 16 Kimi K2.6 42.9%
  17. 17 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 24.2%
  18. 18 DeepSeek-V3.2 23.8%
  19. 19 Claude Sonnet 4.6 max 0%
  20. 20 Claude Opus 4.8 max 0%

Source: Official Agentic BAIM-LLM Evaluation (ABLE) leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3.1 Pro 84.6% high Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.5 Pro 83.6% xhigh Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Kimi K2.5 82.5% Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Kimi K3 78.4% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 GLM-5.2 76.7% max Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 3 Pro 74.7% high Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Mistral Large 4 65.3% high Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B 62.5% Official leaderboard
9 Inkling 59.9% xhigh Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Inkling-Small 57.5% xhigh Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
11 gpt-oss-120b 51.7% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Beam 1.0 50.5% max Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 49.1% Official leaderboard
14 Kimi K2 Thinking 48.1% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 45.2% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Kimi K2.6 42.9% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
17 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 24.2% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
18 DeepSeek-V3.2 23.8% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Claude Sonnet 4.6 0% max Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
20 Claude Opus 4.8 0% max May 2026 Official leaderboard

5 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen OpenAI Google DeepMind Moonshot AI
Own leaderboard 5 leaders
Gemini 3.1 Pro 84.6%

Source: Official Agentic BAIM-LLM Evaluation (ABLE) leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3 Pro gpt-oss-120b Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3 Pro

Source: Official Agentic BAIM-LLM Evaluation (ABLE) leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Biology and chemistry

All 109 in Biology and chemistry
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
  • SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score. Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
  • MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
  • ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%