Benchmark Almanac

AV-SpeakerBench

Gemini 3 Pro 77.6% leads since December 2025
Gemini 3 Pro 77.6% leads since December 2025
Fading

Models answer 3,212 multiple-choice questions about who speaks, what is said and when in real-world videos. Questions need audio and video together.

Qwen reports it in the Qwen3.5-Omni audio-visual table.

Released
December 2025
Kind
Video understanding
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
March 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are expected to jointly interpret vision, audio, and language, yet existing video benchmarks rarely assess fine-grained reasoning about human speech. Many tasks remain visually solvable or only coarsely evaluate speech, offering limited insight into whether models can align who speaks, what is said, and when it occurs. We introduce AV-SpeakerBench, a curated benchmark of 3,212 multiple-choice questions focused on speaker-centric audiovisual reasoning in real-world videos. It features: (1) a speaker-centered formulation that treats speakers-not scenes-as the core reasoning unit; (2) fusion-grounded question design embedding audiovisual dependencies into question semantics; and (3) expert-curated annotations ensuring temporal precision and cross-modal validity. Comprehensive evaluations show that the Gemini family consistently outperforms open-source systems, with Gemini 2.5 Pro achieving the best results. Among open models, Qwen3-Omni-30B approaches Gemini 2.0 Flash but remains far behind Gemini 2.5 Pro, primarily due to weaker audiovisual fusion rather than visual perception. We believe AV-SpeakerBench establishes a rigorous foundation for advancing fine-grained audiovisual reasoning in future multimodal systems.

Abstract of See, Hear, and Understand: Benchmarking Audiovisual Human Speech Understanding in Multimodal Large Language Models (arXiv:2512.02231, CC0)
22
Entries on its own leaderboard, 5 models we track
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 77.6% among models released by November 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 77.6%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in November 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Pro Thinking 77.6%
  2. 2 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) Thinking 73%
  3. 3 Gemini 2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) Thinking 67.8%
  4. 4 Qwen3-Omni 30B 54.1%
  5. 5 Gemini 2.0 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 53.2%
  6. 6 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 51.4%
  7. 7 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 47.2%
  8. 8 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 42.3%
  9. 9 Phi-4 Multimodal 5.6B 38.5%
  10. 10 Qwen2.5-Omni 3B 38.2%
  11. 11 VideoLLAMA2-7B 37.7%
  12. 12 VITA-1.5 7B 36.3%
  13. 13 VITA 7B 33.7%
  14. 14 Video-LLaMA 13B 29.1%
  15. 15 Video-LLaMA 7B 28.2%
  16. 16 Unified-IO 2 xl 3B 27.5%
  17. 17 Unified-IO 2 large 1B 26.1%
  18. 18 OneLLM 7B 25%
  19. 19 Unified-IO 2 xxl 7B 25%
  20. 20 PandaGPT 7B 22.9%
  21. 21 PandaGPT 13B 18.4%
  22. 22 AnyGPT 7B 12.7%

Source: Official AV-SpeakerBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 77.6% Thinking Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 73% Thinking Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 67.8% Thinking Official leaderboard
4 Qwen3-Omni 30B 54.1% Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 2.0 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 53.2% Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 51.4% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 47.2% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 42.3% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Phi-4 Multimodal 5.6B 38.5% Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2.5-Omni 3B 38.2% Official leaderboard
11 VideoLLAMA2-7B 37.7% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
12 VITA-1.5 7B 36.3% Official leaderboard
13 VITA 7B 33.7% Official leaderboard
14 Video-LLaMA 13B 29.1% Official leaderboard
15 Video-LLaMA 7B 28.2% Official leaderboard
16 Unified-IO 2 xl 3B 27.5% Official leaderboard
17 Unified-IO 2 large 1B 26.1% Official leaderboard
18 OneLLM 7B 25% Official leaderboard
19 Unified-IO 2 xxl 7B 25% Official leaderboard
20 PandaGPT 7B 22.9% Official leaderboard
21 PandaGPT 13B 18.4% Official leaderboard
22 AnyGPT 7B 12.7% Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 77.6% Thinking Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 77.2% Sep 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 71.3% Mar 2026 Lab model card
4 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 65.2% Mar 2026 Lab model card
5 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 51.4% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 47.2% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 42.3% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
8 VideoLLAMA2-7B 37.7% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Dec 2025
Gemini 3 Pro 77.6%
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2026

Sources: Official AV-SpeakerBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite VideoLLAMA2-7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Sources: Official AV-SpeakerBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in March 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 65.2 AV-SpeakerBench, Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 71.3 AV-SpeakerBench

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 22, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 77.2 AVSpeaker, cited as arXiv 2512.02231 (Table 5) Capabilities
Apr 17, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 71.3 AV-SpeakerBench (Table 7) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%