AV-SpeakerBench
Models answer 3,212 multiple-choice questions about who speaks, what is said and when in real-world videos. Questions need audio and video together.
Qwen reports it in the Qwen3.5-Omni audio-visual table.
- Made by
- Nguyen et al. (arXiv 2512.02231)
- Released
- December 2025
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- March 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are expected to jointly interpret vision, audio, and language, yet existing video benchmarks rarely assess fine-grained reasoning about human speech. Many tasks remain visually solvable or only coarsely evaluate speech, offering limited insight into whether models can align who speaks, what is said, and when it occurs. We introduce AV-SpeakerBench, a curated benchmark of 3,212 multiple-choice questions focused on speaker-centric audiovisual reasoning in real-world videos. It features: (1) a speaker-centered formulation that treats speakers-not scenes-as the core reasoning unit; (2) fusion-grounded question design embedding audiovisual dependencies into question semantics; and (3) expert-curated annotations ensuring temporal precision and cross-modal validity. Comprehensive evaluations show that the Gemini family consistently outperforms open-source systems, with Gemini 2.5 Pro achieving the best results. Among open models, Qwen3-Omni-30B approaches Gemini 2.0 Flash but remains far behind Gemini 2.5 Pro, primarily due to weaker audiovisual fusion rather than visual perception. We believe AV-SpeakerBench establishes a rigorous foundation for advancing fine-grained audiovisual reasoning in future multimodal systems.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 77.6% among models released by November 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 77.6%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in November 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 77.6
Gemini 3 Pro
- 73.0 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 67.8 Gemini 2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 54.1 Qwen3-Omni 30B
- 53.2 Gemini 2.0 Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 51.4
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
- 47.2
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
- 42.3
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 38.5 Phi-4 Multimodal 5.6B
- 38.2 Qwen2.5-Omni 3B
- 37.7 VideoLLAMA2-7B
- 36.3 VITA-1.5 7B
- 33.7 VITA 7B
- 29.1 Video-LLaMA 13B
- 28.2 Video-LLaMA 7B
- 27.5 Unified-IO 2 xl 3B
- 26.1 Unified-IO 2 large 1B
- 25.0 OneLLM 7B
- 25.0 Unified-IO 2 xxl 7B
- 22.9 PandaGPT 7B
- 18.4 PandaGPT 13B
- 12.7 AnyGPT 7B
- 1
Gemini 3 Pro Thinking 77.6%
- 2 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) Thinking 73%
- 3 Gemini 2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) Thinking 67.8%
- 4 Qwen3-Omni 30B 54.1%
- 5 Gemini 2.0 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 53.2%
- 6
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 51.4%
- 7
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 47.2%
- 8
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 42.3%
- 9 Phi-4 Multimodal 5.6B 38.5%
- 10 Qwen2.5-Omni 3B 38.2%
- 11 VideoLLAMA2-7B 37.7%
- 12 VITA-1.5 7B 36.3%
- 13 VITA 7B 33.7%
- 14 Video-LLaMA 13B 29.1%
- 15 Video-LLaMA 7B 28.2%
- 16 Unified-IO 2 xl 3B 27.5%
- 17 Unified-IO 2 large 1B 26.1%
- 18 OneLLM 7B 25%
- 19 Unified-IO 2 xxl 7B 25%
- 20 PandaGPT 7B 22.9%
- 21 PandaGPT 13B 18.4%
- 22 AnyGPT 7B 12.7%
Source: Official AV-SpeakerBench leaderboard
- 1
Gemini 3 Pro Thinking 77.6%
- 2
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 77.2%
- 3
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 71.3%
- 4
Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 65.2%
- 5
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 51.4%
- 6
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 47.2%
- 7
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 42.3%
- 8 VideoLLAMA2-7B 37.7%
Sources: Official AV-SpeakerBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 77.6% | Thinking | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 73% | Thinking | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Gemini 2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 67.8% | Thinking | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Qwen3-Omni 30B | 54.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 53.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | | 51.4% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 47.2% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 42.3% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Phi-4 Multimodal 5.6B | 38.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | Qwen2.5-Omni 3B | 38.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | VideoLLAMA2-7B | 37.7% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | VITA-1.5 7B | 36.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | VITA 7B | 33.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | Video-LLaMA 13B | 29.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | Video-LLaMA 7B | 28.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | Unified-IO 2 xl 3B | 27.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | Unified-IO 2 large 1B | 26.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | OneLLM 7B | 25% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 19 | Unified-IO 2 xxl 7B | 25% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 20 | PandaGPT 7B | 22.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | PandaGPT 13B | 18.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | AnyGPT 7B | 12.7% | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 77.6% | Thinking | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 77.2% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 71.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 65.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 51.4% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 47.2% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 42.3% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | VideoLLAMA2-7B | 37.7% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official AV-SpeakerBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official AV-SpeakerBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in March 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2026 | 65.2 | AV-SpeakerBench, Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 71.3 | AV-SpeakerBench |
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | | 77.2 | AVSpeaker, cited as arXiv 2512.02231 (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Apr 17, 2026 | | 71.3 | AV-SpeakerBench (Table 7) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%