BALROG
Agentic reasoning on games (NetHack, Crafter, BabyAI, MiniHack...) for LLMs and VLMs.
- Made by
- UCL DARK et al.
- Released
- November 2024
- Kind
- Video games
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs) possess extensive knowledge and exhibit promising reasoning abilities, however, they still struggle to perform well in complex, dynamic environments. Real-world tasks require handling intricate interactions, advanced spatial reasoning, long-term planning, and continuous exploration of new strategies-areas in which we lack effective methodologies for comprehensively evaluating these capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce BALROG, a novel benchmark designed to assess the agentic capabilities of LLMs and VLMs through a diverse set of challenging games. Our benchmark incorporates a range of existing reinforcement learning environments with varying levels of difficulty, including tasks that are solvable by non-expert humans in seconds to extremely challenging ones that may take years to master (e.g., the NetHack Learning Environment). We devise fine-grained metrics to measure performance and conduct an extensive evaluation of several popular open-source and closed-source LLMs and VLMs. Our findings indicate that while current models achieve partial success in the easier games, they struggle significantly with more challenging tasks. Notably, we observe severe deficiencies in vision-based decision-making, as several models perform worse when visual representations of the environments are provided. We release BALROG as an open and user-friendly benchmark to facilitate future research and development in the agentic community. Code and Leaderboard at balrogai.com.
GPT-6 Astra leads with 68.3% among models released by September 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 12 more
- 68.3 GPT-6 Astra
- 63.4 Claude Opus 5
- 60.0 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 58.1
Gemini 3 Pro
- 57.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 53.2 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 48.1
Gemini 3 Flash
- 45.6 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 43.6 Grok 4
- 43.5 Claude Opus 4.5
- 43.3
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 34.9 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified)
- 33.5 Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 32.8 GPT-5-minimal-think
- 32.6 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 32.3 GPT-4o
- 31.2 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 29.5 Grok 3
- 29.2 Reka Flash 3
- 27.9
Llama 3.1-70B
- 27.3
Llama 3.2 90B
- 23.0
Llama 3.3 70B
- 21.0
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 19.5
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B
- 19.3 Claude 3.5 Haiku
- 17.6
Mistral NeMo
- 17.4 GPT-4o mini
- 16.8
Llama 3.2 11B
- 16.2
Qwen2.5-72B
- 15.1
Llama 3.1-8B
- 14.6
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 12.8 Qwen2-VL-72B
- 11.6
Phi-4
- 10.1
Llama 3.2 3B
- 7.80
Qwen2.5-7B
- 6.60
Llama 3.2 1B
- 3.70 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct
- 1 GPT-6 Astra language input; max 68.3%
- 2 Claude Opus 5 language input; max 63.4%
- 3 GPT-5.6 Sol language input; max 60%
- 4
Gemini 3 Pro language input 58.1%
- 5
Gemini 3.1 Pro language input 57%
- 6 GPT-5.6 Terra language input; max 53.2%
- 7
Gemini 3 Flash language input 48.1%
- 8 GPT-5.6 Luna language input; max 45.6%
- 9 Grok 4 language input 43.6%
- 10 Claude Opus 4.5 language input 43.5%
- 11
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025, language input 43.3%
- 12 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) language input 34.9%
- 13 Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) language input 33.5%
- 14 GPT-5-minimal-think language input 32.8%
- 15 Claude 3.5 Sonnet language input 32.6%
- 16 GPT-4o May 2024, language input 32.3%
- 17 Claude Haiku 4.5 language input 31.2%
- 18 Grok 3 language input 29.5%
- 19 Reka Flash 3 language input 29.2%
- 20
Llama 3.1-70B language input 27.9%
- 21
Llama 3.2 90B language input 27.3%
- 22
Llama 3.3 70B language input 23%
- 23
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024, language input 21%
- 24
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B language input 19.5%
- 25 Claude 3.5 Haiku language input 19.3%
- 26
Mistral NeMo language input 17.6%
- 27 GPT-4o mini language input 17.4%
- 28
Llama 3.2 11B language input 16.8%
- 29
Qwen2.5-72B language input 16.2%
- 30
Llama 3.1-8B language input 15.1%
- 31
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024, language input 14.6%
- 32 Qwen2-VL-72B language input 12.8%
- 33
Phi-4 language input 11.6%
- 34
Llama 3.2 3B language input 10.1%
- 35
Qwen2.5-7B language input 7.80%
- 36
Llama 3.2 1B language input 6.60%
- 37 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct language input 3.70%
Source: Official BALROG leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Astra | 68.3% | language input; max | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Opus 5 | 63.4% | language input; max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 60% | language input; max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 58.1% | language input | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 57% | language input | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 53.2% | language input; max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 48.1% | language input | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 45.6% | language input; max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Grok 4 | 43.6% | language input | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 43.5% | language input | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 43.3% | language input | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) | 34.9% | language input | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 33.5% | language input | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | GPT-5-minimal-think | 32.8% | language input | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 32.6% | language input | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 32.3% | language input | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 31.2% | language input | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Grok 3 | 29.5% | language input | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | Reka Flash 3 | 29.2% | language input | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 27.9% | language input | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | | 27.3% | language input | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 23% | language input | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | | 21% | language input | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | | 19.5% | language input | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 19.3% | language input | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | | 17.6% | language input | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | GPT-4o mini | 17.4% | language input | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | | 16.8% | language input | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 29 | | 16.2% | language input | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | | 15.1% | language input | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 31 | | 14.6% | language input | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 32 | Qwen2-VL-72B | 12.8% | language input | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | | 11.6% | language input | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 34 | | 10.1% | language input | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 35 | | 7.80% | language input | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 36 | | 6.60% | language input | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 37 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 3.70% | language input | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
7 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in November 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official BALROG leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official BALROG leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Games and long tasks
- ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 99.95%
- Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Each game scores in-game progress or outcomes, and the board ranks models by their average rank across the games.
Gemini 2.5 Pro 3.90
- MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks.
Seed2.0 Pro 49%
- TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. The score is harmful actions per 100 steps, where lower is better. The board also reports game progress.
Llama 4 Scout 7.00
- GameWorld Only in system cards Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state. GPT-6.1 Terra 76.8%
- Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%