Daily-Omni
Models answer 1,197 multiple choice questions about everyday videos that need audio and visual events aligned in time. Scored by accuracy.
- Made by
- Ziwei Zhou, Rui Wang et al.
- Released
- May 2025
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 3.1 Pro #39 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- September 2026, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve promising performance on visual and audio benchmarks independently. However, the ability of these models to process cross-modal information synchronously remains largely unexplored. We introduce Daily-Omni, a multiple-choice Audio-Visual QA benchmark featuring 684 real-world videos and 1,197 questions spanning 6 task families that explicitly require cross-modal temporal reasoning. To support scalable benchmark construction, we develop a semi-automatic pipeline for annotation, cross-modal consistency refinement, temporal alignment elicitation, and text-only leakage filtering, followed by human verification. We further provide a diagnostic evaluation suite and extensively evaluate 24 foundation models under 37 model–modality settings (Audio+Video / Audio-only / Video-only / Text-only). Finally, we include a training-free modular diagnostic baseline that composes off-the-shelf unimodal models to serve as a diagnostic baseline and to illustrate how explicit temporal alignment signals affect performance. Results indicate that many end-to-end MLLMs still struggle on alignment-critical questions, suggesting that robust cross-modal temporal alignment remains an important open challenge.
AGIBOT WITA-Omni 1.0 tops the leaderboard with 86.2%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash, at 85.1%.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads with 85.1%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 86.2 AGIBOT WITA-Omni 1.0
- 85.2 AGIBOT X-Lab WITA-Omni Preview
- 85.1
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash
- 84.7
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 82.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 82.1
Doubao Seed 2.0 Lite
- 74.5
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
- 73.6
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 73.1 Gemini 2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 71.8 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- 67.8 Gemini 2.0 Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 62.1 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B-Instruct
- 61.9
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
- 61.8 Daily-Omni-Baseline-Qwen2.5
- 61.3
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
- 60.2 Qwen2.5-Omni-3B-Instruct
- 57.3
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- 56.8
Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- 56.5 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 55.1
Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- 50.7 Ola (7B)
- 49.9 Audio Flamingo 3 (7B)
- 40.7
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 37.4
Qwen2.5-VL-3B
- 35.6 Deepseek-V3 (671B)
- 35.2 VideoLLAMA2-7B
- 33.8 Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct
- 31.5 Qwen2-Audio (7B)
- 28.3 Unified-IO-2 XL (3B)
- 28.2 Unified-IO-2 XXL (8B)
- 27.4 Unified-IO-2 L (1B)
- 1 AGIBOT WITA-Omni 1.0 Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 86.2%
- 2 AGIBOT X-Lab WITA-Omni Preview Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 85.2%
- 3
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 85.1%
- 4
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 84.7%
- 5
Gemini 3.1 Pro Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 82.8%
- 6
Doubao Seed 2.0 Lite Apr 2026, Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 82.1%
- 7
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 74.5%
- 8
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 73.6%
- 9 Gemini 2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 73.1%
- 10 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 71.8%
- 11 Gemini 2.0 Flash (snapshot unspecified) Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 67.8%
- 12 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B-Instruct Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 62.1%
- 13
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025, Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 61.9%
- 14 Daily-Omni-Baseline-Qwen2.5 Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 61.8%
- 15
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 61.3%
- 16 Qwen2.5-Omni-3B-Instruct Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 60.2%
- 17
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct Visual Language Models (Visual Only) 57.3%
- 18
Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct Visual Language Models (Visual Only) 56.8%
- 19 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) Visual Language Models (Visual Only) 56.5%
- 20
Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct Visual Language Models (Visual Only) 55.1%
- 21 Ola (7B) Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 50.7%
- 22 Audio Flamingo 3 (7B) Audio Language Models (Audio Only) 49.9%
- 23
Qwen2.5-VL-7B Visual Language Models (Visual Only) 40.7%
- 24
Qwen2.5-VL-3B Visual Language Models (Visual Only) 37.4%
- 25 Deepseek-V3 (671B) Textual Language Models (Without Visual and Audio) 35.6%
- 26 VideoLLAMA2-7B Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 35.2%
- 27 Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct Textual Language Models (Without Visual and Audio) 33.8%
- 28 Qwen2-Audio (7B) Audio Language Models (Audio Only) 31.5%
- 29 Unified-IO-2 XL (3B) Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 28.3%
- 30 Unified-IO-2 XXL (8B) Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 28.2%
- 31 Unified-IO-2 L (1B) Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 27.4%
Source: Official Daily-Omni leaderboard
- 85.1
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash
- 84.7
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 83.5 MiMo-V2.5
- 82.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 82.4
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 82.1
Doubao Seed 2.0 Lite
- 81.8
Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash
- 75.8
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 74.5
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
- 61.9
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
- 61.3
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
- 57.3
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- 56.8
Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- 55.1
Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- 40.7
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 37.4
Qwen2.5-VL-3B
- 35.2 VideoLLAMA2-7B
- 1
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 85.1%
- 2
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 84.7%
- 3 MiMo-V2.5 83.5%
- 4
Gemini 3.1 Pro Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 82.8%
- 5
LongCat-Flash-Omni 82.4%
- 6
Doubao Seed 2.0 Lite Apr 2026, Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 82.1%
- 7
Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 81.8%
- 8
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 75.8%
- 9
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 74.5%
- 10
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025, Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 61.9%
- 11
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 61.3%
- 12
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct Visual Language Models (Visual Only) 57.3%
- 13
Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct Visual Language Models (Visual Only) 56.8%
- 14
Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct Visual Language Models (Visual Only) 55.1%
- 15
Qwen2.5-VL-7B Visual Language Models (Visual Only) 40.7%
- 16
Qwen2.5-VL-3B Visual Language Models (Visual Only) 37.4%
- 17 VideoLLAMA2-7B Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) 35.2%
Sources: Official Daily-Omni leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AGIBOT WITA-Omni 1.0 | 86.2% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | AGIBOT X-Lab WITA-Omni Preview | 85.2% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 85.1% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 84.7% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 82.8% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 82.1% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 74.5% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 73.6% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Gemini 2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 73.1% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct | 71.8% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 67.8% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Qwen2.5-Omni-7B-Instruct | 62.1% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 61.9% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | Daily-Omni-Baseline-Qwen2.5 | 61.8% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 61.3% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | Qwen2.5-Omni-3B-Instruct | 60.2% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 57.3% | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | | 56.8% | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 56.5% | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 55.1% | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | Ola (7B) | 50.7% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Audio Flamingo 3 (7B) | 49.9% | Audio Language Models (Audio Only) | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 40.7% | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | | 37.4% | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | Deepseek-V3 (671B) | 35.6% | Textual Language Models (Without Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | VideoLLAMA2-7B | 35.2% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct | 33.8% | Textual Language Models (Without Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | Qwen2-Audio (7B) | 31.5% | Audio Language Models (Audio Only) | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | Unified-IO-2 XL (3B) | 28.3% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | Unified-IO-2 XXL (8B) | 28.2% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | Unified-IO-2 L (1B) | 27.4% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 85.1% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 84.7% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | MiMo-V2.5 | 83.5% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 82.8% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 82.4% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 82.1% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 81.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 75.8% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 74.5% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 61.9% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 61.3% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 57.3% | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 56.8% | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 55.1% | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 40.7% | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 37.4% | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | VideoLLAMA2-7B | 35.2% | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 7 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official Daily-Omni leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | 85.1% | |||
| | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | 84.7% | |||
| | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | 82.8% | |||
| | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | 82.1% | |||
| | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | 74.5% | |||
| | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | 73.6% | |||
| | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | 61.9% | |||
| | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | 61.3% | |||
| | Omni-Modal Language Models (Audio Only) | 60.6% | |||
| | Omni-Modal Language Models (Visual Only) | 57.7% | |||
| | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | 57.3% | |||
| | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | 56.8% | |||
| | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | 55.1% | |||
| | Omni-Modal Language Models (Visual Only) | 52.4% | |||
| | Omni-Modal Language Models (Audio Only) | 51.8% | |||
| | Omni-Modal Language Models (Visual Only) | 43.1% | |||
| | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | 40.7% | |||
| | Visual Language Models (Visual Only) | 37.4% | |||
| VideoLLAMA2-7B | Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | 35.2% |
5 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in May 2025 6 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official Daily-Omni leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash on the official leaderboard passed 85% in September 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official Daily-Omni leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in September 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | 85.1 | DailyOmni Audio-Visual Understanding | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 74.5 | Daily Omni | |
| Apr 22, 2026 | MiMo-V2.5 | 83.5 | DailyOmni |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 81.8 | DailyOmni, Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 84.6 | DailyOmni | |
| Oct 31, 2025 | 82.4 | DailyOmni | |
| Sep 22, 2025 | 75.8 | DailyOmni (Thinking variant) |
5 system cards report it, from 3 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | | 85.1 | DailyOmni (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Apr 27, 2026 | | 74.1 | DailyOmni, reasoning on, 74.5 reasoning off (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Apr 17, 2026 | | 84.6 | DailyOmni (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Oct 31, 2025 | | 82.4 | DailyOmni (Table 14) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2025 | | 75.8 | DailyOmni, Thinking only (Table 12) | Capabilities |
4 lab claims next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 3 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 75.8% DailyOmni (Thinking variant) | 73.6% Leaderboard, Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | +2.2 pts |
| | 84.6% DailyOmni | 84.7% Leaderboard, Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Same |
| | 74.5% Daily Omni | 74.5% Leaderboard, Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Same |
| | 85.1% DailyOmni Audio-Visual Understanding | 85.1% Leaderboard, Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Same |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%