JointAVBench
Models answer questions about videos that cannot be answered from vision or audio alone. Questions cover speech and sound events over several scene spans.
The Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash table spells it JoinAVBench.
- Made by
- Chao et al. (arXiv 2512.12772)
- Released
- December 2025
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 #111 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- September 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Understanding videos inherently requires reasoning over both visual and auditory information. To properly evaluate Omni-Large Language Models (Omni-LLMs), which are capable of processing multi-modal information including vision and audio, an effective benchmark must comprehensively cover three key aspects: (1) multi-modal dependency (i.e., questions that cannot be answered using vision or audio alone), (2) diverse audio information types (e.g., speech, sound events), and (3) varying scene spans. However, existing datasets fall short in one or more of these dimensions, limiting strict and comprehensive evaluation. To address this gap, we introduce JointAVBench, a novel benchmark with strict audio-video correlation, spanning five cognitive dimensions, four audio information types (speech, sound events, music, vocal traits), and three scene spans (single-, cross-, and full-scene). Given the high cost of manual annotation, we propose an automated pipeline that leverages state-of-the-art vision-LLMs, audio-LLMs, and general-purpose LLMs to synthesize questions and answers that strictly require joint audio-visual understanding. We evaluate leading vision-only, audio-only, and Omni-LLMs on our dataset. Results show that even the best-performing Omni-LLM achieves an average accuracy of only 65.3%, outperforming uni-modal baselines but revealing substantial room for improvement, especially in cross-scene reasoning.
Gemini2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 65.3%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Gemini 2.5 Flash, at 58%.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads with 75.9%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 65.3 Gemini2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 63.6 Qwen3-Omni 30B
- 58.0
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 56.5
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 51.7
InternVL2.5-8B
- 50.0 VideoLLAMA3-7B
- 47.7
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 47.1 LLaVA-Video 7B
- 46.8 VideoLLAMA2-7B
- 46.7 v-SALMONN-2+ 7B
- 45.6 Kimi-Audio 7B
- 45.0 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 39.5 Qwen2-Audio 7B
- 36.9 OneLLM 7B
- 36.4 v-SALMONN-o1 7B
- 35.8 v-SALMONN 7B
- 31.0 AVicuna 7B
- 1 Gemini2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 65.3%
- 2 Qwen3-Omni 30B 63.6%
- 3
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 58%
- 4
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 56.5%
- 5
InternVL2.5-8B 51.7%
- 6 VideoLLAMA3-7B 50%
- 7
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 47.7%
- 8 LLaVA-Video 7B 47.1%
- 9 VideoLLAMA2-7B 46.8%
- 10 v-SALMONN-2+ 7B 46.7%
- 11 Kimi-Audio 7B 45.6%
- 12 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 45%
- 13 Qwen2-Audio 7B 39.5%
- 14 OneLLM 7B 36.9%
- 15 v-SALMONN-o1 7B 36.4%
- 16 v-SALMONN 7B 35.8%
- 17 AVicuna 7B 31%
Source: Official JointAVBench leaderboard
- 1
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.9%
- 2
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 69.5%
- 3
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 58%
- 4
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 56.5%
- 5
InternVL2.5-8B 51.7%
- 6 VideoLLAMA3-7B 50%
- 7
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 47.7%
- 8 VideoLLAMA2-7B 46.8%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official JointAVBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 65.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | Qwen3-Omni 30B | 63.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | | 58% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 56.5% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 51.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | VideoLLAMA3-7B | 50% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 47.7% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | LLaVA-Video 7B | 47.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | VideoLLAMA2-7B | 46.8% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | v-SALMONN-2+ 7B | 46.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | Kimi-Audio 7B | 45.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 45% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | Qwen2-Audio 7B | 39.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | OneLLM 7B | 36.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | v-SALMONN-o1 7B | 36.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | v-SALMONN 7B | 35.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | AVicuna 7B | 31% | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 75.9% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 69.5% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 58% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 56.5% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 51.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | VideoLLAMA3-7B | 50% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 47.7% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | VideoLLAMA2-7B | 46.8% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official JointAVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official JointAVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in September 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | 75.9 | JoinAVBench Audio-Visual Understanding | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 69.5 | JointAVBench |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | | 75.9 | JoinAVBench (Table 5) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%