Benchmark Almanac

JointAVBench

Gemini2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 65.3% tops its leaderboard Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 58% leads the models we track
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.9% leads since September 2026
Fading

Models answer questions about videos that cannot be answered from vision or audio alone. Questions cover speech and sound events over several scene spans.

The Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash table spells it JoinAVBench.

Released
December 2025
Kind
Video understanding
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 #111 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Understanding videos inherently requires reasoning over both visual and auditory information. To properly evaluate Omni-Large Language Models (Omni-LLMs), which are capable of processing multi-modal information including vision and audio, an effective benchmark must comprehensively cover three key aspects: (1) multi-modal dependency (i.e., questions that cannot be answered using vision or audio alone), (2) diverse audio information types (e.g., speech, sound events), and (3) varying scene spans. However, existing datasets fall short in one or more of these dimensions, limiting strict and comprehensive evaluation. To address this gap, we introduce JointAVBench, a novel benchmark with strict audio-video correlation, spanning five cognitive dimensions, four audio information types (speech, sound events, music, vocal traits), and three scene spans (single-, cross-, and full-scene). Given the high cost of manual annotation, we propose an automated pipeline that leverages state-of-the-art vision-LLMs, audio-LLMs, and general-purpose LLMs to synthesize questions and answers that strictly require joint audio-visual understanding. We evaluate leading vision-only, audio-only, and Omni-LLMs on our dataset. Results show that even the best-performing Omni-LLM achieves an average accuracy of only 65.3%, outperforming uni-modal baselines but revealing substantial room for improvement, especially in cross-scene reasoning.

Abstract of JointAVBench: A Benchmark for Joint Audio-Visual Reasoning Evaluation (arXiv:2512.12772, CC0)
17
Entries on its own leaderboard, 6 models we track
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Gemini2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 65.3%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Gemini 2.5 Flash, at 58%.

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads with 75.9%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 65.3%
  2. 2 Qwen3-Omni 30B 63.6%
  3. 3 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 58%
  4. 4 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 56.5%
  5. 5 InternVL2.5-8B 51.7%
  6. 6 VideoLLAMA3-7B 50%
  7. 7 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 47.7%
  8. 8 LLaVA-Video 7B 47.1%
  9. 9 VideoLLAMA2-7B 46.8%
  10. 10 v-SALMONN-2+ 7B 46.7%
  11. 11 Kimi-Audio 7B 45.6%
  12. 12 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 45%
  13. 13 Qwen2-Audio 7B 39.5%
  14. 14 OneLLM 7B 36.9%
  15. 15 v-SALMONN-o1 7B 36.4%
  16. 16 v-SALMONN 7B 35.8%
  17. 17 AVicuna 7B 31%

Source: Official JointAVBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 65.3% Official leaderboard
2 Qwen3-Omni 30B 63.6% Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 58% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 56.5% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
5 InternVL2.5-8B 51.7% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
6 VideoLLAMA3-7B 50% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 47.7% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
8 LLaVA-Video 7B 47.1% Official leaderboard
9 VideoLLAMA2-7B 46.8% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
10 v-SALMONN-2+ 7B 46.7% Official leaderboard
11 Kimi-Audio 7B 45.6% Official leaderboard
12 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 45% Official leaderboard
13 Qwen2-Audio 7B 39.5% Official leaderboard
14 OneLLM 7B 36.9% Official leaderboard
15 v-SALMONN-o1 7B 36.4% Official leaderboard
16 v-SALMONN 7B 35.8% Official leaderboard
17 AVicuna 7B 31% Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.9% Sep 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 69.5% Apr 2026 Lab model card
3 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 58% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 56.5% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
5 InternVL2.5-8B 51.7% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
6 VideoLLAMA3-7B 50% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 47.7% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
8 VideoLLAMA2-7B 46.8% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind ByteDance Seed Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Dec 2025
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2026

Sources: Official JointAVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash Seed2.0 Lite (0428) Gemini 2.5 Flash Qwen2.5-Omni-7B InternVL2.5-8B VideoLLAMA3-7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash Seed2.0 Lite (0428)

Sources: Official JointAVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in September 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 18, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.9 JoinAVBench Audio-Visual Understanding
Apr 28, 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 69.5 JointAVBench

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 22, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 75.9 JoinAVBench (Table 5) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%