MORSE-500
Models answer questions embedded in 500 scripted video clips across six reasoning categories, including abstract, physical, planning, spatial and temporal reasoning.
Clips are generated by scripts, so harder versions can be made as models improve. The Seed2.0 page spells it Morese-500.
- Made by
- Cai et al. (MORSE-500 team)
- Released
- June 2025
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Strongest model tested
- o3 #83 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- April 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- April 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Despite rapid advances in vision-language models (VLMs), current benchmarks for multimodal reasoning fall short in three key dimensions. First, they overwhelmingly rely on static images, failing to capture the temporal complexity of real-world environments. Second, they narrowly focus on mathematical problem-solving, neglecting the broader spectrum of reasoning skills – including abstract, physical, planning, spatial, and temporal capabilities – required for robust multimodal intelligence. Third, many benchmarks quickly saturate, offering limited headroom for diagnosing failure modes or measuring continued progress. We introduce MORSE-500 (Multimodal Reasoning Stress-test Environment), a video benchmark composed of 500 fully scripted clips with embedded questions spanning six complementary reasoning categories. Each instance is programmatically generated using deterministic Python scripts (via Manim, Matplotlib, MoviePy), generative video models, and curated real footage. This script-driven design allows fine-grained control over visual complexity, distractor density, and temporal dynamics – enabling difficulty to be scaled systematically as models improve. Unlike static benchmarks that become obsolete once saturated, MORSE-500 is built to evolve: its controllable generation pipeline supports the creation of arbitrarily challenging new instances, making it ideally suited for stress-testing next-generation models. Initial experiments with state-of-the-art systems – including various Gemini 2.5 Pro and OpenAI o3 which represent the strongest available at the time, alongside strong open-source models – reveal substantial performance gaps across all categories, with particularly large deficits in abstract and planning tasks. We release the full dataset, generation scripts, and evaluation harness to support transparent, reproducible, and forward-looking multimodal reasoning research.
o3 leads with 23.6% among models released by April 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
Seed2.0 Pro leads with 37.4%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 23.6 o3
- 22.2 o4-mini
- 21.8 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 19.8 o1
- 19.2 Gemini 2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 18.8 Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 17.8
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 17.4 GPT 4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 16.8 Qwen2.5 VL 32B AWQ
- 16.4 Qwen2.5 VL 72B AWQ
- 16.0 Gemini 2.0 Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 15.6
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
- 14.6
Gemma 3 27B
- 14.2 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (snapshot unspecified)
- 11.6 MiniCPM-o-2_6
- 11.4
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 11.2
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 7.80
InternVL3-8B
- 7.60
Qwen2.5-VL-3B
- 5.00 LLaVA-NeXT-Video 7B
- 1 o3 23.6%
- 2 o4-mini 22.2%
- 3 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 21.8%
- 4 o1 19.8%
- 5 Gemini 2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 19.2%
- 6 Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 18.8%
- 7
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 17.8%
- 8 GPT 4o (snapshot unspecified) 17.4%
- 9 Qwen2.5 VL 32B AWQ 16.8%
- 10 Qwen2.5 VL 72B AWQ 16.4%
- 11 Gemini 2.0 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 16%
- 12
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 15.6%
- 13
Gemma 3 27B 14.6%
- 14 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (snapshot unspecified) 14.2%
- 15 MiniCPM-o-2_6 11.6%
- 16
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 11.4%
- 17
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 11.2%
- 18
InternVL3-8B 7.80%
- 19
Qwen2.5-VL-3B 7.60%
- 20 LLaVA-NeXT-Video 7B 5.00%
Source: Official MORSE-500 leaderboard
- 1
Seed2.0 Pro 37.4%
- 2
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 34.6%
- 3 o3 23.6%
- 4 o4-mini 22.2%
- 5 o1 19.8%
- 6
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 17.8%
- 7
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 15.6%
- 8
Gemma 3 27B 14.6%
- 9 MiniCPM-o-2_6 11.6%
- 10
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 11.4%
- 11
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 11.2%
- 12
InternVL3-8B 7.80%
- 13
Qwen2.5-VL-3B 7.60%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official MORSE-500 leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | o3 | 23.6% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | o4-mini | 22.2% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 21.8% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | o1 | 19.8% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Gemini 2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 19.2% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 18.8% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 17.8% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | GPT 4o (snapshot unspecified) | 17.4% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Qwen2.5 VL 32B AWQ | 16.8% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Qwen2.5 VL 72B AWQ | 16.4% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 16% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 15.6% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 14.6% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (snapshot unspecified) | 14.2% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | MiniCPM-o-2_6 | 11.6% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 11.4% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 11.2% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 7.80% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 7.60% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | LLaVA-NeXT-Video 7B | 5.00% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 37.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 34.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | o3 | 23.6% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | o4-mini | 22.2% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | o1 | 19.8% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 17.8% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 15.6% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 14.6% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | MiniCPM-o-2_6 | 11.6% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 11.4% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 11.2% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 7.80% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 7.60% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official MORSE-500 leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official MORSE-500 leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | 34.6 | Morese-500 |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 37.4 | Morse-500, 5 FPS input (Table 9) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%