Benchmark Almanac

MORSE-500

o3 23.6% leads since June 2025
Seed2.0 Pro 37.4% leads since February 2026
Fading

Models answer questions embedded in 500 scripted video clips across six reasoning categories, including abstract, physical, planning, spatial and temporal reasoning.

Clips are generated by scripts, so harder versions can be made as models improve. The Seed2.0 page spells it Morese-500.

Released
June 2025
Kind
Video understanding
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Strongest model tested
o3 #83 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
April 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
April 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Despite rapid advances in vision-language models (VLMs), current benchmarks for multimodal reasoning fall short in three key dimensions. First, they overwhelmingly rely on static images, failing to capture the temporal complexity of real-world environments. Second, they narrowly focus on mathematical problem-solving, neglecting the broader spectrum of reasoning skills – including abstract, physical, planning, spatial, and temporal capabilities – required for robust multimodal intelligence. Third, many benchmarks quickly saturate, offering limited headroom for diagnosing failure modes or measuring continued progress. We introduce MORSE-500 (Multimodal Reasoning Stress-test Environment), a video benchmark composed of 500 fully scripted clips with embedded questions spanning six complementary reasoning categories. Each instance is programmatically generated using deterministic Python scripts (via Manim, Matplotlib, MoviePy), generative video models, and curated real footage. This script-driven design allows fine-grained control over visual complexity, distractor density, and temporal dynamics – enabling difficulty to be scaled systematically as models improve. Unlike static benchmarks that become obsolete once saturated, MORSE-500 is built to evolve: its controllable generation pipeline supports the creation of arbitrarily challenging new instances, making it ideally suited for stress-testing next-generation models. Initial experiments with state-of-the-art systems – including various Gemini 2.5 Pro and OpenAI o3 which represent the strongest available at the time, alongside strong open-source models – reveal substantial performance gaps across all categories, with particularly large deficits in abstract and planning tasks. We release the full dataset, generation scripts, and evaluation harness to support transparent, reproducible, and forward-looking multimodal reasoning research.

Abstract of MORSE-500: A Programmatically Controllable Video Benchmark to Stress-Test Multimodal Reasoning (arXiv:2506.05523, CC0)
20
Entries on its own leaderboard, 11 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

o3 leads with 23.6% among models released by April 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Seed2.0 Pro leads with 37.4%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 o3 23.6%
  2. 2 o4-mini 22.2%
  3. 3 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 21.8%
  4. 4 o1 19.8%
  5. 5 Gemini 2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 19.2%
  6. 6 Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 18.8%
  7. 7 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 17.8%
  8. 8 GPT 4o (snapshot unspecified) 17.4%
  9. 9 Qwen2.5 VL 32B AWQ 16.8%
  10. 10 Qwen2.5 VL 72B AWQ 16.4%
  11. 11 Gemini 2.0 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 16%
  12. 12 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 15.6%
  13. 13 Gemma 3 27B 14.6%
  14. 14 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (snapshot unspecified) 14.2%
  15. 15 MiniCPM-o-2_6 11.6%
  16. 16 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 11.4%
  17. 17 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 11.2%
  18. 18 InternVL3-8B 7.80%
  19. 19 Qwen2.5-VL-3B 7.60%
  20. 20 LLaVA-NeXT-Video 7B 5.00%

Source: Official MORSE-500 leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 o3 23.6% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
2 o4-mini 22.2% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 21.8% May 2025 Official leaderboard
4 o1 19.8% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 19.2% May 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 18.8% May 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 17.8% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
8 GPT 4o (snapshot unspecified) 17.4% May 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen2.5 VL 32B AWQ 16.8% May 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2.5 VL 72B AWQ 16.4% May 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Gemini 2.0 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 16% May 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 15.6% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Gemma 3 27B 14.6% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (snapshot unspecified) 14.2% May 2025 Official leaderboard
15 MiniCPM-o-2_6 11.6% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 11.4% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
17 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 11.2% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
18 InternVL3-8B 7.80% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Qwen2.5-VL-3B 7.60% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
20 LLaVA-NeXT-Video 7B 5.00% May 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.0 Pro 37.4% Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 34.6% Apr 2026 Lab model card
3 o3 23.6% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
4 o4-mini 22.2% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
5 o1 19.8% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 17.8% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 15.6% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Gemma 3 27B 14.6% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
9 MiniCPM-o-2_6 11.6% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 11.4% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 11.2% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
12 InternVL3-8B 7.80% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen2.5-VL-3B 7.60% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2025
o3 23.6%

Source: Official MORSE-500 leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro o3 o1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro o3

Sources: Official MORSE-500 leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Apr 28, 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 34.6 Morese-500

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 37.4 Morse-500, 5 FPS input (Table 9) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%