MusTBench
Models answer five kinds of music questions that need the correct time region of the audio, such as instrument entries. Music experts validated the items.
Qwen reports it as music understanding.
- Made by
- Kwon et al. (arXiv 2605.29300)
- Released
- May 2026
- Kind
- Audio understanding and voice
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- September 2026
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Recent Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have demonstrated promising abilities in understanding musical content. However, whether their responses are grounded in the correct temporal regions of the audio remains underexplored. This limitation is particularly critical for music understanding, where key information often occurs as temporally localized events, such as instrument entries and rhythmic transitions. To address this gap, we introduce MusTBench, a music-expert-validated benchmark designed to evaluate temporal grounding in LALMs through five temporally grounded question-answering tasks. To further improve temporal grounding in existing models, we propose MusT, a novel four-stage temporal optimization recipe spanning music encoder adaptation, LLM adaptation, LLM supervised fine-tuning, and RL-based optimization. Experiments on MusTBench show that existing LALMs struggle with precise temporal grounding, while MusT brings significant improvements over strong baselines. These results establish temporal grounding as a key missing capability in current LALMs and position MusTBench as a challenging benchmark for future research in temporally grounded music understanding.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads with 50.6%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Gemini 3 Flash leads with 38.1% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads with 50.6%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1
Gemini 3 Flash 38.1%
- 2
Gemini 3 Pro 36.6%
- 3
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 30.2%
- 4
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 24.3%
Source: Official MusTBench leaderboard
- 1
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 50.6%
- 2
Gemini 3 Flash 38.1%
- 3
Gemini 3 Pro 36.6%
- 4
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 30.2%
- 5
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 24.3%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official MusTBench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 50.6% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 38.1% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 36.6% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 30.2% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 24.3% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 50.6% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 38.1% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 36.6% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 30.2% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 24.3% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 15 entries, 4 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official MusTBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official MusTBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | 50.6 | MusTBench Music Understanding |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | | 50.6 | MusTBench (Table 4) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%