Benchmark Almanac

MusTBench

Gemini 3 Flash 38.1% leads since May 2026
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 50.6% leads since September 2026
In use

Models answer five kinds of music questions that need the correct time region of the audio, such as instrument entries. Music experts validated the items.

Qwen reports it as music understanding.

Released
May 2026
Kind
Audio understanding and voice
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2026
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Recent Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have demonstrated promising abilities in understanding musical content. However, whether their responses are grounded in the correct temporal regions of the audio remains underexplored. This limitation is particularly critical for music understanding, where key information often occurs as temporally localized events, such as instrument entries and rhythmic transitions. To address this gap, we introduce MusTBench, a music-expert-validated benchmark designed to evaluate temporal grounding in LALMs through five temporally grounded question-answering tasks. To further improve temporal grounding in existing models, we propose MusT, a novel four-stage temporal optimization recipe spanning music encoder adaptation, LLM adaptation, LLM supervised fine-tuning, and RL-based optimization. Experiments on MusTBench show that existing LALMs struggle with precise temporal grounding, while MusT brings significant improvements over strong baselines. These results establish temporal grounding as a key missing capability in current LALMs and position MusTBench as a challenging benchmark for future research in temporally grounded music understanding.

Abstract of MusTBench: Benchmarking and Advancing Temporal Grounding in Music LLMs (arXiv:2605.29300, CC0)
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads with 50.6%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Gemini 3 Flash leads with 38.1% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads with 50.6%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 50.6%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 50.6% Sep 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Flash 38.1% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3 Pro 36.6% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 30.2% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 24.3% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 50.6% Sep 2026 Lab model card
2 Gemini 3 Flash 38.1% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3 Pro 36.6% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 30.2% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 24.3% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 15 entries, 4 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since May 2026

Source: Official MusTBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash Gemini 3 Flash Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash Gemini 3 Flash

Sources: Official MusTBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 18, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 50.6 MusTBench Music Understanding

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 22, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 50.6 MusTBench (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 233 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%