OmniCap-IF
Models write captions for videos with audio while following detailed user constraints. Captions are scored on format and content compliance.
Labs report two rates, CSR and ISR.
- Made by
- Nanjing University (NJU-LINK Lab) and others
- Released
- June 2026
- Kind
- Video captioning
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 3.1 Pro #39 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- September 2026
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
While Omni-modal Large Language Models (OLLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in jointly processing audio and visual streams, their ability to strictly adhere to complex, multi-faceted user instructions remains largely unexplored. Existing benchmarks primarily focus on holistic video understanding or text-only instruction following, failing to capture the intricate interplay between modalities and user constraints. To bridge this gap, we introduce OmniCap-IF, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate instruction-following capabilities in omni-modal captioning. OmniCap-IF incorporates a systematic framework that assesses captions on two dimensions: format correctness and content correctness. Our benchmark encompasses 50 distinct constraint types across pure visual, pure audio, and audio-visual modalities, while integrating Temporal Grounding to assess spatio-temporal precision. Extensive evaluations of prominent models on 1,920 high-quality samples reveal significant performance disparities. Furthermore, our analysis uncovers a critical "format-content tradeoff", demonstrating that increasing formatting complexity directly degrades models' omni-modal reasoning abilities. Finally, to advance the field, we curate a 54K instruction-tuning dataset, OmniCap-IF-54K and present OmniCaptioner-IF, which achieves notable improvements in both complex instruction adherence and general omni-modal captioning performance.
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads with 80.7% among models released by April 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads with 80.7%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 80.7
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 79.5
Gemini 3 Flash
- 76.2 MiMo-V2.5
- 74.4 MiMo-V2-Omni
- 71.9
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 70.7 OmniCaptioner-IF-7B
- 66.7 OmniCaptioner-IF-3B
- 64.7 MiniCPM-o-4.5-9B
- 62.6 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- 49.2
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 47.4 MiniCPM-o-2.6-8B
- 40.1 Qwen2.5-Omni-3B
- 33.0 HumanOmniV2-7B
- 32.8 video-SALMONN-2-7B
- 29.7 ARC-Hunyuan-Video-7B
- 24.5 ASID-Captioner-7B
- 1
Gemini 3.1 Pro 80.7%
- 2
Gemini 3 Flash 79.5%
- 3 MiMo-V2.5 76.2%
- 4 MiMo-V2-Omni 74.4%
- 5
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B thinking 71.9%
- 6 OmniCaptioner-IF-7B 70.7%
- 7 OmniCaptioner-IF-3B 66.7%
- 8 MiniCPM-o-4.5-9B 64.7%
- 9 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct 62.6%
- 10
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 49.2%
- 11 MiniCPM-o-2.6-8B 47.4%
- 12 Qwen2.5-Omni-3B 40.1%
- 13 HumanOmniV2-7B 33%
- 14 video-SALMONN-2-7B 32.8%
- 15 ARC-Hunyuan-Video-7B 29.7%
- 16 ASID-Captioner-7B 24.5%
Source: Official OmniCap-IF leaderboard
- 1
Gemini 3.1 Pro 80.7%
- 2
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 80.6%
- 3
Gemini 3 Flash 79.5%
- 4 MiMo-V2.5 76.2%
- 5 MiMo-V2-Omni 74.4%
- 6
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B thinking 71.9%
- 7
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 49.2%
Sources: Official OmniCap-IF leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 80.7% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 79.5% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | MiMo-V2.5 | 76.2% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | MiMo-V2-Omni | 74.4% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 71.9% | thinking | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | OmniCaptioner-IF-7B | 70.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | OmniCaptioner-IF-3B | 66.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | MiniCPM-o-4.5-9B | 64.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct | 62.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 49.2% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | MiniCPM-o-2.6-8B | 47.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | Qwen2.5-Omni-3B | 40.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | HumanOmniV2-7B | 33% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | video-SALMONN-2-7B | 32.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | ARC-Hunyuan-Video-7B | 29.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | ASID-Captioner-7B | 24.5% | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 80.7% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 80.6% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 79.5% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | MiMo-V2.5 | 76.2% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | MiMo-V2-Omni | 74.4% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 71.9% | thinking | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 49.2% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official OmniCap-IF leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official OmniCap-IF leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | 80.6 | OmniCap-IF Audio-Visual Caption CSR 80.6 ISR 28.2 |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | | 80.6 | OmniCap-IF CSR, ISR 28.2 (Table 5) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%