QIVD
Models answer spoken questions about short phone videos in real time, as in a face to face talk. Each item has a short answer and a timestamp.
Published at ICLR 2026. Qwen reports it as audio-visual interaction.
- Made by
- Qualcomm AI Research and University of Toronto
- Released
- March 2025
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Last in a launch post
- September 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
AI models have made significant strides in recent years in their ability to describe and answer questions about real-world images. They have also made progress in the ability to converse with users in real-time using audio input. This raises the question: have we reached the point where AI models, connected to a camera and microphone, can converse with users in real-time about scenes and events that are unfolding live in front of the camera? This has been a long-standing goal in AI and is a prerequisite for real-world AI assistants and humanoid robots to interact with humans in everyday situations. In this work, we introduce a new dataset and benchmark, the Qualcomm Interactive Video Dataset (IVD), which allows us to assess the extent to which existing models can support these abilities, and to what degree these capabilities can be instilled through fine-tuning. The dataset is based on a simple question-answering setup, where users ask questions that the system has to answer, in real-time, based on the camera and audio input. We show that existing models fall far behind human performance on this task, and we identify the main sources for the performance gap. However, we also show that for many of the required perceptual skills, fine-tuning on this form of data can significantly reduce this gap.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads with 69.6% among models released by September 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
VideoLLAMA3-7B leads with 56.4% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads with 69.6%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 69.6%
- 2
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 68.5%
- 3
Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 66.3%
- 4
TML-Interaction-Small 54%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 VideoLLAMA3-7B Offline 56.4%
- 2
Qwen2.5-VL-7B Offline 50.6%
- 3 VideoLLAMA2-7B Offline 50.1%
- 4
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B Offline 45.9%
Source: Official QIVD leaderboard
- 1
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 69.6%
- 2
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 68.5%
- 3
Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 66.3%
- 4 VideoLLAMA3-7B Offline 56.4%
- 5
TML-Interaction-Small 54%
- 6
Qwen2.5-VL-7B Offline 50.6%
- 7 VideoLLAMA2-7B Offline 50.1%
- 8
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B Offline 45.9%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official QIVD leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 69.6% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 68.5% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 66.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 54% | May 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VideoLLAMA3-7B | 56.4% | Offline | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 50.6% | Offline | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | VideoLLAMA2-7B | 50.1% | Offline | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 45.9% | Offline | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 69.6% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 68.5% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 66.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | VideoLLAMA3-7B | 56.4% | Offline | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 54% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 50.6% | Offline | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | VideoLLAMA2-7B | 50.1% | Offline | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 45.9% | Offline | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 19 entries, 4 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official QIVD leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VideoLLAMA3-7B | Offline | 56.4% | |||
| | Offline | 50.6% | |||
| VideoLLAMA3-7B | Streaming | 50.6% | |||
| VideoLLAMA2-7B | Offline | 50.1% | |||
| | Offline | 45.9% | |||
| | Streaming | 44.9% | |||
| | Streaming | 44% | |||
| VideoLLAMA2-7B | Streaming | 43.3% |
2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in March 2025 Number one over time 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in March 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official QIVD leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official QIVD leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in September 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | 69.6 | QIVD Audio-Visual Interaction | |
| May 11, 2026 | 54 | QIVD accuracy, streaming video plus audio | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 66.3 | QualcommInteractive, Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 68.5 | QualcommInteractive |
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | | 69.6 | QIVD (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Apr 17, 2026 | | 68.5 | Qualcomm IVD, audio query (Table 7) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%