Benchmark Almanac

QIVD

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 69.6% leads since September 2026
VideoLLAMA3-7B 56.4% leads since March 2025
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 69.6% leads since September 2026
Fading

Models answer spoken questions about short phone videos in real time, as in a face to face talk. Each item has a short answer and a timestamp.

Published at ICLR 2026. Qwen reports it as audio-visual interaction.

Released
March 2025
Kind
Video understanding
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
September 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

AI models have made significant strides in recent years in their ability to describe and answer questions about real-world images. They have also made progress in the ability to converse with users in real-time using audio input. This raises the question: have we reached the point where AI models, connected to a camera and microphone, can converse with users in real-time about scenes and events that are unfolding live in front of the camera? This has been a long-standing goal in AI and is a prerequisite for real-world AI assistants and humanoid robots to interact with humans in everyday situations. In this work, we introduce a new dataset and benchmark, the Qualcomm Interactive Video Dataset (IVD), which allows us to assess the extent to which existing models can support these abilities, and to what degree these capabilities can be instilled through fine-tuning. The dataset is based on a simple question-answering setup, where users ask questions that the system has to answer, in real-time, based on the camera and audio input. We show that existing models fall far behind human performance on this task, and we identify the main sources for the performance gap. However, we also show that for many of the required perceptual skills, fine-tuning on this form of data can significantly reduce this gap.

Abstract of Can Vision-Language Models Answer Face to Face Questions in the Real-World? (arXiv:2503.19356, CC0)
4
Models scored in lab cards
4
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads with 69.6% among models released by September 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

VideoLLAMA3-7B leads with 56.4% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads with 69.6%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 69.6%
  2. 2 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 68.5%
  3. 3 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 66.3%
  4. 4 TML-Interaction-Small 54%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 69.6% Sep 2026 Lab model card
2 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 68.5% Mar 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 66.3% Mar 2026 Lab model card
4 TML-Interaction-Small 54% May 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 VideoLLAMA3-7B 56.4% Offline Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 50.6% Offline Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
3 VideoLLAMA2-7B 50.1% Offline Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 45.9% Offline Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 69.6% Sep 2026 Lab model card
2 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 68.5% Mar 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 66.3% Mar 2026 Lab model card
4 VideoLLAMA3-7B 56.4% Offline Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
5 TML-Interaction-Small 54% May 2026 Lab model card
6 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 50.6% Offline Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
7 VideoLLAMA2-7B 50.1% Offline Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 45.9% Offline Mar 2025 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 19 entries, 4 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
VideoLLAMA3-7B
Streaming Offline
56.4%
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
Streaming Offline
50.6%
VideoLLAMA2-7B
Streaming Offline
50.1%
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Streaming Offline
45.9%

Source: Official QIVD leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
VideoLLAMA3-7B Offline 56.4%
Qwen2.5-VL-7B Offline 50.6%
VideoLLAMA3-7B Streaming 50.6%
VideoLLAMA2-7B Offline 50.1%
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B Offline 45.9%
Qwen2.5-VL-7B Streaming 44.9%
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B Streaming 44%
VideoLLAMA2-7B Streaming 43.3%

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in March 2025 Number one over time 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in March 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Other labs Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Mar 2025
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2026

Sources: Official QIVD leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus VideoLLAMA3-7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash VideoLLAMA3-7B

Sources: Official QIVD leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in September 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
Thinking Machines
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 18, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 69.6 QIVD Audio-Visual Interaction
May 11, 2026 TML-Interaction-Small 54 QIVD accuracy, streaming video plus audio
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 66.3 QualcommInteractive, Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 68.5 QualcommInteractive

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 22, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 69.6 QIVD (Table 5) Capabilities
Apr 17, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 68.5 Qualcomm IVD, audio query (Table 7) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%