Benchmark Almanac

VBench-2.0

EasyDistill-Wan 67.1% tops its leaderboard Veo 3 66.7% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Video generation models are scored on intrinsic faithfulness, such as human fidelity, controllability, creativity, physics and commonsense, beyond pixel quality and basic prompt match.

A VBench-2.0 Video Arena on Hugging Face shows the generated videos. 33 HF paper upvotes.

Released
March 2025
Kind
Video generation
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last model added
September 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Video generation has advanced significantly, evolving from producing unrealistic outputs to generating videos that appear visually convincing and temporally coherent. To evaluate these video generative models, benchmarks such as VBench have been developed to assess their faithfulness, measuring factors like per-frame aesthetics, temporal consistency, and basic prompt adherence. However, these aspects mainly represent superficial faithfulness, which focus on whether the video appears visually convincing rather than whether it adheres to real-world principles. While recent models perform increasingly well on these metrics, they still struggle to generate videos that are not just visually plausible but fundamentally realistic. To achieve real "world models" through video generation, the next frontier lies in intrinsic faithfulness to ensure that generated videos adhere to physical laws, commonsense reasoning, anatomical correctness, and compositional integrity. Achieving this level of realism is essential for applications such as AI-assisted filmmaking and simulated world modeling. To bridge this gap, we introduce VBench-2.0, a next-generation benchmark designed to automatically evaluate video generative models for their intrinsic faithfulness. VBench-2.0 assesses five key dimensions: Human Fidelity, Controllability, Creativity, Physics, and Commonsense, each further broken down into fine-grained capabilities. Tailored to individual dimensions, our evaluation framework integrates generalists such as SOTA VLMs and LLMs, and specialists, including anomaly detection methods proposed for video generation. We conduct extensive human annotations to ensure evaluation alignment with human judgment. By pushing beyond superficial faithfulness toward intrinsic faithfulness, VBench-2.0 aims to set a new standard for the next generation of video generative models in pursuit of intrinsic faithfulness.

Abstract of VBench-2.0: Advancing Video Generation Benchmark Suite for Intrinsic Faithfulness (arXiv:2503.21755, CC0)
14
Entries on its own leaderboard, 1 model we track

EasyDistill-Wan tops the leaderboard with 67.1%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Veo 3, at 66.7%.

  1. 1 EasyDistill-Wan 67.1%
  2. 2 Veo 3 66.7%
  3. 3 Vivy-R-Vision-3B 65.8%
  4. 4 JT-CV 64.6%
  5. 5 ABot-World v0.1 64.5%
  6. 6 Vidu Q1 (2025-04-17) 62.7%
  7. 7 ToMoviee 2.0 61.8%
  8. 8 Wan2.1 60.2%
  9. 9 Seedance 1.0 Pro (2025-05-28) 59.8%
  10. 10 Kling 1.6 59%
  11. 11 Sora-480p 58.4%
  12. 12 StepVideo 55.8%
  13. 13 HunyuanVideo 55.3%
  14. 14 CogVideoX-1.5 53.4%

Source: Official VBench-2.0 leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 EasyDistill-Wan 67.1% Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Veo 3 66.7% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Vivy-R-Vision-3B 65.8% Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
4 JT-CV 64.6% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
5 ABot-World v0.1 64.5% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Vidu Q1 (2025-04-17) 62.7% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 ToMoviee 2.0 61.8% Official leaderboard
8 Wan2.1 60.2% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Seedance 1.0 Pro (2025-05-28) 59.8% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Kling 1.6 59% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Sora-480p 58.4% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
12 StepVideo 55.8% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
13 HunyuanVideo 55.3% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
14 CogVideoX-1.5 53.4% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Veo 3 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Veo 3

Source: Official VBench-2.0 leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

Versions

More in Audio and video

All 233 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%