Benchmark Almanac

VBench

Veo 3 85.1% leads since August 2025
Veo 3 85.1% leads since August 2025
Fading

Video generation models make clips from prompts, and automatic checks score 16 dimensions of quality and prompt adherence.

Results give Quality, Semantic and Total scores. VBench++ (TPAMI 2025) extends it to image-to-video and trustworthiness. VBench-2.0 (2025-03) tests intrinsic faithfulness with new dimensions. VBench and V*Bench are different tests.

Released
November 2023
Kind
Video generation
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
February 2026, dropped after it saturated
Last model added
February 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Video generation has witnessed significant advancements, yet evaluating these models remains a challenge. A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for video generation is indispensable for two reasons: 1) Existing metrics do not fully align with human perceptions; 2) An ideal evaluation system should provide insights to inform future developments of video generation. To this end, we present VBench, a comprehensive benchmark suite that dissects "video generation quality" into specific, hierarchical, and disentangled dimensions, each with tailored prompts and evaluation methods. VBench has three appealing properties: 1) Comprehensive Dimensions: VBench comprises 16 dimensions in video generation (e.g., subject identity inconsistency, motion smoothness, temporal flickering, and spatial relationship, etc). The evaluation metrics with fine-grained levels reveal individual models' strengths and weaknesses. 2) Human Alignment: We also provide a dataset of human preference annotations to validate our benchmarks' alignment with human perception, for each evaluation dimension respectively. 3) Valuable Insights: We look into current models' ability across various evaluation dimensions, and various content types. We also investigate the gaps between video and image generation models. We will open-source VBench, including all prompts, evaluation methods, generated videos, and human preference annotations, and also include more video generation models in VBench to drive forward the field of video generation.

Abstract of VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Models (arXiv:2311.17982, CC0)
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

ERNIE 5.0 leads with 84.2%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Veo 3 leads with 85.1% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Veo 3 leads with 85.1%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 ERNIE 5.0 84.2%

Source: Labs’ model cards

  1. 1 Veo 3 85.1%
  2. 2 Sora 84.3%
  3. 3 Wan2.1-T2V-1.3B 84.3%
  4. 4 Wan2.1-T2V-14B 83.7%

Source: Official VBench leaderboard

Sources: Official VBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 ERNIE 5.0 84.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Veo 3 85.1% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Sora 84.3% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Wan2.1-T2V-1.3B 84.3% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Wan2.1-T2V-14B 83.7% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Veo 3 85.1% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Sora 84.3% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Wan2.1-T2V-1.3B 84.3% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
4 ERNIE 5.0 84.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
5 Wan2.1-T2V-14B 83.7% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 74 entries, 4 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in November 2023 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in November 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Aug 2025, by Veo 3
Veo 3 85.1%

Source: Official VBench leaderboard

Veo 3 on the official leaderboard passed 85% in August 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Veo 3 Sora 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Veo 3

Sources: Official VBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in February 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Baidu
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Feb 6, 2026 ERNIE 5.0 84.2 VBench Overall (Quality 84.40, Semantic 83.40)

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Feb 4, 2026 ERNIE 5.0 technical report 84.2 VBench Overall, Quality 84.40, Semantic 83.40 (Table 6) Capabilities

Versions

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%