BLINK
Models answer 3,807 multiple choice questions built from 14 classic computer vision tasks that use one or more images. Scoring is accuracy.
Test answers are hidden on EvalAI, so model cards usually report the 1,901 question validation split.
- Made by
- Xingyu Fu et al.
- Released
- April 2024
- Kind
- General visual questions
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
- Strongest model tested
- Kimi K2.5 #75 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We introduce Blink, a new benchmark for multimodal language models (LLMs) that focuses on core visual perception abilities not found in other evaluations. Most of the Blink tasks can be solved by humans "within a blink" (e.g., relative depth estimation, visual correspondence, forensics detection, and multi-view reasoning). However, we find these perception-demanding tasks cast significant challenges for current multimodal LLMs because they resist mediation through natural language. Blink reformats 14 classic computer vision tasks into 3,807 multiple-choice questions, paired with single or multiple images and visual prompting. While humans get 95.70% accuracy on average, Blink is surprisingly challenging for existing multimodal LLMs: even the best-performing GPT-4V and Gemini achieve accuracies of 51.26% and 45.72%, only 13.17% and 7.63% higher than random guessing, indicating that such perception abilities have not "emerged" yet in recent multimodal LLMs. Our analysis also highlights that specialist CV models could solve these problems much better, suggesting potential pathways for future improvements. We believe Blink will stimulate the community to help multimodal LLMs catch up with human-level visual perception.
Seed2.1 Pro leads with 81.4%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
GPT-4V leads with 51.3% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Seed2.1 Pro leads with 81.4%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 81.4
Seed2.1 Pro
- 79.5
Seed2.0 Pro
- 78.9 Kimi K2.5
- 74.3
Seed1.8
- 72.1
Seed1.5-VL
- 71.3
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- 70.0
ERNIE 5.0
- 68.8
EXAONE 4.5 33B
- 68.0
SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B
- 67.1
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 66.8
STEP3-VL-10B
- 65.5 GLM-4.6V
- 65.3 GLM-4.5V
- 65.1 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 64.4
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 63.1
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 62.8
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking
- 61.5 LFM2.5-VL-3B
- 61.4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 61.4
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 61.3
Phi-4-multimodal
- 57.8
gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview
- 57.0 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
- 56.7
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 52.7
North Micro Vision Instruct
- 44.5 LFM2-VL-1.6B
- 39.6
Gemma 3 27B
- 38.0
Gemma 3 4B
- 35.9
Gemma 3 12B
- 1
Seed2.1 Pro 81.4%
- 2
Seed2.0 Pro 79.5%
- 3 Kimi K2.5 78.9%
- 4
Seed1.8 74.3%
- 5
Seed1.5-VL 72.1%
- 6
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 71.3%
- 7
ERNIE 5.0 70%
- 8
EXAONE 4.5 33B 68.8%
- 9
SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 68%
- 10
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 67.1%
- 11
STEP3-VL-10B 66.8%
- 12 GLM-4.6V 65.5%
- 13 GLM-4.5V 65.3%
- 14 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 65.1%
- 15
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 64.4%
- 16
LongCat-Flash-Omni 63.1%
- 17
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 62.8%
- 18 LFM2.5-VL-3B 61.5%
- 19
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 61.4%
- 20
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 61.4%
- 21
Phi-4-multimodal 61.3%
- 22
gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview 57.8%
- 23 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 57%
- 24
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 56.7%
- 25
North Micro Vision Instruct 52.7%
- 26 LFM2-VL-1.6B 44.5%
- 27
Gemma 3 27B 39.6%
- 28
Gemma 3 4B 38%
- 29
Gemma 3 12B 35.9%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 GPT-4V 51.3%
- 2
Gemini 1.0 Pro 45.7%
- 3
LLaVA-v1.6-34B 45%
- 4 Claude 3 Opus 44.1%
- 5
Yi-VL-34B 42.8%
- 6 Qwen-VL-Max 41.9%
- 7
Yi-VL-6B 41.2%
- 8
LLaVA-v1.5-13B 40.5%
- 9 CogVLM-17B-Chat 39.4%
- 10 instructblip-vicuna-7b 38.6%
- 11 llava-v1.5-7b 38%
Source: Official BLINK leaderboard
- 81.4
Seed2.1 Pro
- 79.5
Seed2.0 Pro
- 78.9 Kimi K2.5
- 74.3
Seed1.8
- 72.1
Seed1.5-VL
- 71.3
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- 70.0
ERNIE 5.0
- 68.8
EXAONE 4.5 33B
- 68.0
SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B
- 67.1
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 66.8
STEP3-VL-10B
- 65.5 GLM-4.6V
- 65.3 GLM-4.5V
- 65.1 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 64.4
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 63.1
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 62.8
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking
- 61.5 LFM2.5-VL-3B
- 61.4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 61.4
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 61.3
Phi-4-multimodal
- 57.8
gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview
- 57.0 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
- 56.7
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 52.7
North Micro Vision Instruct
- 51.3 GPT-4V
- 45.7
Gemini 1.0 Pro
- 45.0
LLaVA-v1.6-34B
- 44.5 LFM2-VL-1.6B
- 44.1 Claude 3 Opus
- 42.8
Yi-VL-34B
- 41.9 Qwen-VL-Max
- 41.2
Yi-VL-6B
- 40.5
LLaVA-v1.5-13B
- 39.6
Gemma 3 27B
- 39.4 CogVLM-17B-Chat
- 38.6 instructblip-vicuna-7b
- 38.0 llava-v1.5-7b
- 38.0
Gemma 3 4B
- 35.9
Gemma 3 12B
- 1
Seed2.1 Pro 81.4%
- 2
Seed2.0 Pro 79.5%
- 3 Kimi K2.5 78.9%
- 4
Seed1.8 74.3%
- 5
Seed1.5-VL 72.1%
- 6
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 71.3%
- 7
ERNIE 5.0 70%
- 8
EXAONE 4.5 33B 68.8%
- 9
SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 68%
- 10
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 67.1%
- 11
STEP3-VL-10B 66.8%
- 12 GLM-4.6V 65.5%
- 13 GLM-4.5V 65.3%
- 14 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 65.1%
- 15
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 64.4%
- 16
LongCat-Flash-Omni 63.1%
- 17
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 62.8%
- 18 LFM2.5-VL-3B 61.5%
- 19
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 61.4%
- 20
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 61.4%
- 21
Phi-4-multimodal 61.3%
- 22
gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview 57.8%
- 23 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 57%
- 24
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 56.7%
- 25
North Micro Vision Instruct 52.7%
- 26 GPT-4V 51.3%
- 27
Gemini 1.0 Pro 45.7%
- 28
LLaVA-v1.6-34B 45%
- 29 LFM2-VL-1.6B 44.5%
- 30 Claude 3 Opus 44.1%
- 31
Yi-VL-34B 42.8%
- 32 Qwen-VL-Max 41.9%
- 33
Yi-VL-6B 41.2%
- 34
LLaVA-v1.5-13B 40.5%
- 35
Gemma 3 27B 39.6%
- 36 CogVLM-17B-Chat 39.4%
- 37 instructblip-vicuna-7b 38.6%
- 38 llava-v1.5-7b 38%
- 39
Gemma 3 4B 38%
- 40
Gemma 3 12B 35.9%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official BLINK leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 81.4% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 79.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Kimi K2.5 | 78.9% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 74.3% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 72.1% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 71.3% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 70% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 68.8% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 68% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 67.1% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 66.8% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | GLM-4.6V | 65.5% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | GLM-4.5V | 65.3% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 65.1% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 64.4% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 63.1% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 62.8% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 61.5% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 61.4% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 61.4% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 61.3% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 57.8% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 57% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 56.7% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 52.7% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | LFM2-VL-1.6B | 44.5% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | | 39.6% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | | 38% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | | 35.9% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4V | 51.3% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 45.7% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 45% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Claude 3 Opus | 44.1% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 42.8% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Qwen-VL-Max | 41.9% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 41.2% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 40.5% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | CogVLM-17B-Chat | 39.4% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | instructblip-vicuna-7b | 38.6% | May 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | llava-v1.5-7b | 38% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 81.4% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 79.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Kimi K2.5 | 78.9% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 74.3% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 72.1% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 71.3% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 70% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 68.8% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 68% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 67.1% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 66.8% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | GLM-4.6V | 65.5% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | GLM-4.5V | 65.3% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 65.1% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 64.4% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 63.1% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 62.8% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 61.5% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 61.4% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 61.4% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 61.3% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 57.8% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 57% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 56.7% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 52.7% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | GPT-4V | 51.3% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 45.7% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 45% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | LFM2-VL-1.6B | 44.5% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | Claude 3 Opus | 44.1% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | 42.8% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | Qwen-VL-Max | 41.9% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | | 41.2% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 40.5% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 39.6% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 36 | CogVLM-17B-Chat | 39.4% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | instructblip-vicuna-7b | 38.6% | May 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | llava-v1.5-7b | 38% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | | 38% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 40 | | 35.9% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 38 entries, 11 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
7 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in April 2024 Number one over time 8 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official BLINK leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official BLINK leaderboard and labs’ model cards
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 61.5 | BLINK |
| Aug 12, 2026 | 52.7 | BLINK | |
| Apr 9, 2026 | 68.8 | BLINK | |
| Feb 6, 2026 | 70 | BLINK | |
| Jan 13, 2026 | 66.8 | BLINK | |
| Jan 8, 2026 | 68 | BLINK | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 74.3 | BLINK | |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GLM-4.6V | 65.5 | BLINK (Val) |
| Nov 11, 2025 | 62.8 | BLINK | |
| Oct 31, 2025 | 63.1 | BLINK | |
| Sep 23, 2025 | 67.1 | BLINK | |
| Aug 12, 2025 | LFM2-VL-1.6B | 44.4 | BLINK |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 65.3 | BLINK (val) |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 65.1 | BLINK |
| May 12, 2025 | 72.1 | BLINK | |
| Mar 12, 2025 | 39.6 | BLINK (PT) | |
| Feb 26, 2025 | 61.3 | BLINK | |
| May 14, 2024 | 61.4 | Blink (val), 0-shot |
24 system cards report it, from 13 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | | 71.3 | BLINK, SpatialClaw harness, with agentic vision training, Table 7 | Capabilities |
| Jun 23, 2026 | | 81.4 | BLINK (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Apr 9, 2026 | | 68.8 | BLINK (Table 2, Reasoning mode). The 3.2 text says 68.7 | Capabilities |
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 74.3 | BLINK (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 79.5 | BLINK (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Feb 4, 2026 | | 70 | BLINK (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Jan 30, 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 78.9 | BLINK (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Jan 14, 2026 | | 66.8 | BLINK, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 67.39 | Capabilities |
| Jan 1, 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 65.5 | BLINK (Val), GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Nov 28, 2025 | LFM2-VL-1.6B technical report | 44.5 | BLINK, LFM2-VL-1.6B (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 67.1 | BLINK (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Nov 6, 2025 | | 56.7 | BLINK (Val), reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 57.6 | Capabilities |
| Oct 31, 2025 | | 63.1 | BLINK (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Sep 25, 2025 | | 57.8 | BLINK (Table 19, thinking on). Thinking off 65.2 | Capabilities |
| Aug 25, 2025 | | 61.4 | BLINK (val) (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Aug 13, 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 65.3 | BLINK (Val), GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 65.1 | BLINK (Val), GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 72.1 | BLINK, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 70.2 | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 38 | BLINK, PT, 0-shot (Table 11) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 39.6 | BLINK, PT, 0-shot (Table 11) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 35.9 | BLINK, PT, 0-shot (Table 11) | Capabilities |
| Mar 3, 2025 | | 61.3 | BLINK (test) (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | 64.4 | BLINK val (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 57 | BLINK (val), model picks the answer directly (Table 6) | Capabilities |
One logged change that moves scores
Changes by the maintainers, so a score from before a change may not compare with one from after it. Newest first, each with the maintainers' own source. The list may be incomplete. What we log.
- Grader changed September 27th, 2025
The BLINK maintainers corrected the answer-matching prompt to mark the current response as the grading target. Runs using the earlier prompt can map free-form answers to choices differently. Source
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%