CrossVid
Models reason across several videos at once in 10 tasks, with 9,015 questions on 5,331 videos in single-choice, multiple-choice and open-ended formats.
Accepted to AAAI 2026.
- Made by
- Li et al. (CrossVid team)
- Released
- November 2025
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-4.1 #137 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- April 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- June 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Cross-Video Reasoning (CVR) presents a significant challenge in video understanding, which requires simultaneous understanding of multiple videos to aggregate and compare information across groups of videos. Most existing video understanding benchmarks focus on single-video analysis, failing to assess the ability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to simultaneously reason over various videos. Recent benchmarks evaluate MLLMs' capabilities on multi-view videos that capture different perspectives of the same scene. However, their limited tasks hinder a thorough assessment of MLLMs in diverse real-world CVR scenarios. To this end, we introduce CrossVid, the first benchmark designed to comprehensively evaluate MLLMs' spatial-temporal reasoning ability in cross-video contexts. Firstly, CrossVid encompasses a wide spectrum of hierarchical tasks, comprising four high-level dimensions and ten specific tasks, thereby closely reflecting the complex and varied nature of real-world video understanding. Secondly, CrossVid provides 5,331 videos, along with 9,015 challenging question-answering pairs, spanning single-choice, multiple-choice, and open-ended question formats. Through extensive experiments on various open-source and closed-source MLLMs, we observe that Gemini-2.5-Pro performs best on CrossVid, achieving an average accuracy of 50.4%. Notably, our in-depth case study demonstrates that most current MLLMs struggle with CVR tasks, primarily due to their inability to integrate or compare evidence distributed across multiple videos for reasoning. These insights highlight the potential of CrossVid to guide future advancements in enhancing MLLMs' CVR capabilities.
Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 50.4%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-4.1, at 45.2%.
Seed2.1 Pro leads with 65%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 50.4 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 45.2 GPT-4.1
- 44.3 Doubao-1.5-VL-pro
- 36.8 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 35.1 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 34.4
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 33.7
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
- 28.3 MiMo-7B
- 28.2 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking
- 27.5 LLaVA-OV-72B
- 27.5 LLaVA-Video-72B
- 25.8
InternVL3-78B
- 25.6 MiniCPM-o-2_6
- 25.6
InternVL3-8B
- 24.8 ERNIE-4.5-VL-A3B
- 24.6
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 23.5
InternVL3-38B
- 21.6 Video-R1-7B
- 21.5 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
- 18.3
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 18.0 LongVA-7B-DPO
- 15.3 VideoLLAMA3-7B
- 1 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) frames=128 50.4%
- 2 GPT-4.1 frames=<50 45.2%
- 3 Doubao-1.5-VL-pro frames=256 44.3%
- 4 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) frames=<50 36.8%
- 5 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking frames=256 35.1%
- 6
Qwen2.5-VL-72B frames=256 34.4%
- 7
Qwen2.5-VL-32B frames=256 33.7%
- 8 MiMo-7B frames=256 28.3%
- 9 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking frames=256 28.2%
- 10 LLaVA-OV-72B frames=24 27.5%
- 11 LLaVA-Video-72B frames=128 27.5%
- 12
InternVL3-78B frames=128 25.8%
- 13 MiniCPM-o-2_6 frames=128 25.6%
- 14
InternVL3-8B frames=128 25.6%
- 15 ERNIE-4.5-VL-A3B frames=440 24.8%
- 16
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B frames=64 24.6%
- 17
InternVL3-38B frames=128 23.5%
- 18 Video-R1-7B frames=256 21.6%
- 19 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct frames=64 21.5%
- 20
Qwen2.5-VL-7B frames=256 18.3%
- 21 LongVA-7B-DPO frames=256 18%
- 22 VideoLLAMA3-7B frames=180 15.3%
Source: Official CrossVid leaderboard
- 65.0
Seed2.1 Pro
- 63.7
Seed2.0 Lite (0428)
- 60.3
Seed2.0 Pro
- 45.2 GPT-4.1
- 35.1 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 34.4
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 33.7
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
- 28.2 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking
- 25.8
InternVL3-78B
- 25.6 MiniCPM-o-2_6
- 25.6
InternVL3-8B
- 24.6
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 23.5
InternVL3-38B
- 21.5 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
- 18.3
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 15.3 VideoLLAMA3-7B
- 1
Seed2.1 Pro 65%
- 2
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 63.7%
- 3
Seed2.0 Pro 60.3%
- 4 GPT-4.1 frames=<50 45.2%
- 5 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking frames=256 35.1%
- 6
Qwen2.5-VL-72B frames=256 34.4%
- 7
Qwen2.5-VL-32B frames=256 33.7%
- 8 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking frames=256 28.2%
- 9
InternVL3-78B frames=128 25.8%
- 10 MiniCPM-o-2_6 frames=128 25.6%
- 11
InternVL3-8B frames=128 25.6%
- 12
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B frames=64 24.6%
- 13
InternVL3-38B frames=128 23.5%
- 14 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct frames=64 21.5%
- 15
Qwen2.5-VL-7B frames=256 18.3%
- 16 VideoLLAMA3-7B frames=180 15.3%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official CrossVid leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 50.4% | frames=128 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-4.1 | 45.2% | frames=<50 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Doubao-1.5-VL-pro | 44.3% | frames=256 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 36.8% | frames=<50 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 35.1% | frames=256 | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 34.4% | frames=256 | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 33.7% | frames=256 | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | MiMo-7B | 28.3% | frames=256 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking | 28.2% | frames=256 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | LLaVA-OV-72B | 27.5% | frames=24 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | LLaVA-Video-72B | 27.5% | frames=128 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 25.8% | frames=128 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | MiniCPM-o-2_6 | 25.6% | frames=128 | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 25.6% | frames=128 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | ERNIE-4.5-VL-A3B | 24.8% | frames=440 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 24.6% | frames=64 | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 23.5% | frames=128 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Video-R1-7B | 21.6% | frames=256 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 21.5% | frames=64 | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 18.3% | frames=256 | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | LongVA-7B-DPO | 18% | frames=256 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | VideoLLAMA3-7B | 15.3% | frames=180 | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 65% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 63.7% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 60.3% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | GPT-4.1 | 45.2% | frames=<50 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 35.1% | frames=256 | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 34.4% | frames=256 | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 33.7% | frames=256 | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking | 28.2% | frames=256 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 25.8% | frames=128 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | MiniCPM-o-2_6 | 25.6% | frames=128 | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 25.6% | frames=128 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 24.6% | frames=64 | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 23.5% | frames=128 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 21.5% | frames=64 | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 18.3% | frames=256 | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | VideoLLAMA3-7B | 15.3% | frames=180 | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 4 models have held number one with claims included since its release in November 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official CrossVid leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official CrossVid leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | 63.7 | CrossVid |
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | | 65 | CrossVid (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 60.3 | CrossVid (Table 9) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%