Benchmark Almanac

CrossVid

Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 50.4% tops its leaderboard GPT-4.1 45.2% leads the models we track
Seed2.1 Pro 65% leads since June 2026
Fading

Models reason across several videos at once in 10 tasks, with 9,015 questions on 5,331 videos in single-choice, multiple-choice and open-ended formats.

Accepted to AAAI 2026.

Released
November 2025
Kind
Video understanding
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-4.1 #137 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
April 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
June 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Cross-Video Reasoning (CVR) presents a significant challenge in video understanding, which requires simultaneous understanding of multiple videos to aggregate and compare information across groups of videos. Most existing video understanding benchmarks focus on single-video analysis, failing to assess the ability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to simultaneously reason over various videos. Recent benchmarks evaluate MLLMs' capabilities on multi-view videos that capture different perspectives of the same scene. However, their limited tasks hinder a thorough assessment of MLLMs in diverse real-world CVR scenarios. To this end, we introduce CrossVid, the first benchmark designed to comprehensively evaluate MLLMs' spatial-temporal reasoning ability in cross-video contexts. Firstly, CrossVid encompasses a wide spectrum of hierarchical tasks, comprising four high-level dimensions and ten specific tasks, thereby closely reflecting the complex and varied nature of real-world video understanding. Secondly, CrossVid provides 5,331 videos, along with 9,015 challenging question-answering pairs, spanning single-choice, multiple-choice, and open-ended question formats. Through extensive experiments on various open-source and closed-source MLLMs, we observe that Gemini-2.5-Pro performs best on CrossVid, achieving an average accuracy of 50.4%. Notably, our in-depth case study demonstrates that most current MLLMs struggle with CVR tasks, primarily due to their inability to integrate or compare evidence distributed across multiple videos for reasoning. These insights highlight the potential of CrossVid to guide future advancements in enhancing MLLMs' CVR capabilities.

Abstract of CrossVid: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-Video Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models (arXiv:2511.12263, CC0)
22
Entries on its own leaderboard, 13 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 50.4%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-4.1, at 45.2%.

Seed2.1 Pro leads with 65%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) frames=128 50.4%
  2. 2 GPT-4.1 frames=<50 45.2%
  3. 3 Doubao-1.5-VL-pro frames=256 44.3%
  4. 4 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) frames=<50 36.8%
  5. 5 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking frames=256 35.1%
  6. 6 Qwen2.5-VL-72B frames=256 34.4%
  7. 7 Qwen2.5-VL-32B frames=256 33.7%
  8. 8 MiMo-7B frames=256 28.3%
  9. 9 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking frames=256 28.2%
  10. 10 LLaVA-OV-72B frames=24 27.5%
  11. 11 LLaVA-Video-72B frames=128 27.5%
  12. 12 InternVL3-78B frames=128 25.8%
  13. 13 MiniCPM-o-2_6 frames=128 25.6%
  14. 14 InternVL3-8B frames=128 25.6%
  15. 15 ERNIE-4.5-VL-A3B frames=440 24.8%
  16. 16 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B frames=64 24.6%
  17. 17 InternVL3-38B frames=128 23.5%
  18. 18 Video-R1-7B frames=256 21.6%
  19. 19 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct frames=64 21.5%
  20. 20 Qwen2.5-VL-7B frames=256 18.3%
  21. 21 LongVA-7B-DPO frames=256 18%
  22. 22 VideoLLAMA3-7B frames=180 15.3%

Source: Official CrossVid leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 50.4% frames=128 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4.1 45.2% frames=<50 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Doubao-1.5-VL-pro 44.3% frames=256 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 36.8% frames=<50 Official leaderboard
5 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 35.1% frames=256 Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 34.4% frames=256 Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 33.7% frames=256 Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
8 MiMo-7B 28.3% frames=256 Official leaderboard
9 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking 28.2% frames=256 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
10 LLaVA-OV-72B 27.5% frames=24 Official leaderboard
11 LLaVA-Video-72B 27.5% frames=128 Official leaderboard
12 InternVL3-78B 25.8% frames=128 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
13 MiniCPM-o-2_6 25.6% frames=128 Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
14 InternVL3-8B 25.6% frames=128 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
15 ERNIE-4.5-VL-A3B 24.8% frames=440 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 24.6% frames=64 Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
17 InternVL3-38B 23.5% frames=128 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Video-R1-7B 21.6% frames=256 Official leaderboard
19 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 21.5% frames=64 Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
20 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 18.3% frames=256 Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
21 LongVA-7B-DPO 18% frames=256 Official leaderboard
22 VideoLLAMA3-7B 15.3% frames=180 Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.1 Pro 65% Jun 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 63.7% Apr 2026 Lab model card
3 Seed2.0 Pro 60.3% Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 GPT-4.1 45.2% frames=<50 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
5 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 35.1% frames=256 Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 34.4% frames=256 Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 33.7% frames=256 Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking 28.2% frames=256 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
9 InternVL3-78B 25.8% frames=128 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
10 MiniCPM-o-2_6 25.6% frames=128 Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
11 InternVL3-8B 25.6% frames=128 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 24.6% frames=64 Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
13 InternVL3-38B 23.5% frames=128 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 21.5% frames=64 Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 18.3% frames=256 Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
16 VideoLLAMA3-7B 15.3% frames=180 Jan 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 4 models have held number one with claims included since its release in November 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI ByteDance Seed
Own leaderboard Not tested since Nov 2025
GPT-4.1 45.2%
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026

Sources: Official CrossVid leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed2.0 Pro GPT-4.1 Qwen2.5-VL-72B MiniCPM-o-2_6 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct VideoLLAMA3-7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro GPT-4.1

Sources: Official CrossVid leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Apr 28, 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 63.7 CrossVid

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 23, 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 65 CrossVid (Table 10) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 60.3 CrossVid (Table 9) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%