Benchmark Almanac

OSWorld-Verified

Intelligence-Indeed Agent 90.2% tops its leaderboard Claude Fable 5 86% leads the models we track
Qwen 3.8 Max 86.1% leads since August 2026
In use

369 open-ended tasks in real desktop apps. Agent acts through screenshots, mouse and keyboard. Execution-based checkers score success.

Human baseline 72.4%. Top reported scores are ~83-86%, so near-saturated. Successor OSWorld 2.0 released 2026-06 (repo xlang-ai/OSWorld-V2).

Released
July 2025
Kind
Desktop apps
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude Opus 5 #10 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Autonomous agents that accomplish complex computer tasks with minimal human interventions have the potential to transform human-computer interaction, significantly enhancing accessibility and productivity. However, existing benchmarks either lack an interactive environment or are limited to environments specific to certain applications or domains, failing to reflect the diverse and complex nature of real-world computer use, thereby limiting the scope of tasks and agent scalability. To address this issue, we introduce OSWorld, the first-of-its-kind scalable, real computer environment for multimodal agents, supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across various operating systems such as Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS. OSWorld can serve as a unified, integrated computer environment for assessing open-ended computer tasks that involve arbitrary applications. Building upon OSWorld, we create a benchmark of 369 computer tasks involving real web and desktop apps in open domains, OS file I/O, and workflows spanning multiple applications. Each task example is derived from real-world computer use cases and includes a detailed initial state setup configuration and a custom execution-based evaluation script for reliable, reproducible evaluation. Extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLM/VLM-based agents on OSWorld reveals significant deficiencies in their ability to serve as computer assistants. While humans can accomplish over 72.36% of the tasks, the best model achieves only 12.24% success, primarily struggling with GUI grounding and operational knowledge. Comprehensive analysis using OSWorld provides valuable insights for developing multimodal generalist agents that were not possible with previous benchmarks. Our code, environment, baseline models, and data are publicly available at https://os-world.github.io.

Abstract of OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments (arXiv:2404.07972, CC0)
55
Entries on its own leaderboard, 33 models we track
40
Launch posts list it, from 11 labs
19
System cards report it, from 7 labs

Intelligence-Indeed Agent tops the leaderboard with 90.2%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude Fable 5, at 86%.

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 86.1%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Intelligence-Indeed Agent 100 steps 90.2%
  2. 2 Claude Fable 5 1M context, 100 steps 86%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.7 100 steps 83.6%
  4. 4 Claude Opus 5 1M context, 100 steps 83.4%
  5. 5 Coasty CUA v1 100 steps 82.8%
  6. 6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 100 steps 81.5%
  7. 7 Muse Spark 1.1 100 steps 80.7%
  8. 8 Holo3-35B-A3B 100 steps 80.4%
  9. 9 Gemini 3.1 Pro 100 steps 78.3%
  10. 10 Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps 76.3%
  11. 11 MiniMax-M3 100 steps 75.2%
  12. 12 Qwen3.7-Plus 100 steps 73.3%
  13. 13 Kimi K2.6 100 steps 73.1%
  14. 14 agent s3 w/ Opus 4.5 + GPT-5 bBoN (N=10) 100 steps 72.6%
  15. 15 GPT-5 100 steps 69.9%
  16. 16 GBOX Agent 15 steps 64.2%
  17. 17 Kimi K2.5 100 steps 63.3%
  18. 18 Claude Sonnet 4.5 100 steps 62.9%
  19. 19 Agentic-Lybic-Maestro 100 steps 61.9%
  20. 20 Seed1.8 100 steps 61.9%
  21. 21 CoACT-1 150 steps 60.8%
  22. 22 aworldGUIAgent-v1 50 steps 58%
  23. 23 EvoCUA-20260105 50 steps 56.7%
  24. 24 o3 100 steps 56%
  25. 25 GUI-Owl-1.5 32B 50 steps 55.4%
  26. 26 DeepMiner-Mano-72B 100 steps 53.9%
  27. 27 UI-TARS-2 100 steps 53.1%
  28. 28 EvoCUA 50 steps 50.3%
  29. 29 autoglm-os-9b-20250925 50 steps 48%
  30. 30 autoglm-os-9b 50 steps 47.3%
  31. 31 EvoCUA-8B 50 steps 46.1%
  32. 32 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025, 50 steps 45.8%
  33. 33 opencua-72b-preview 100 steps 45%
  34. 34 Claude Sonnet 4 50 steps 43.9%
  35. 35 UI-TARS-250705 100 steps 41.8%
  36. 36 Qwen3-VL-Flash 100 steps 41.6%
  37. 37 DART-GUI-7B-0924 30 steps 40.5%
  38. 38 DeepMiner-Mano-7B 100 steps 40.1%
  39. 39 doubao-1-5-thinking-vision-pro-250717 100 steps 40%
  40. 40 GUI-Owl-32B 50 steps 38.9%
  41. 41 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 50 steps 35.8%
  42. 42 OpenCUA-32B 100 steps 34.8%
  43. 43 Seed1.5-VL 100 steps 33.8%
  44. 44 GUI-Owl-7B 15 steps 32.1%
  45. 45 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 50 steps 31.3%
  46. 46 TianXi-Action-7B 50 steps 29.8%
  47. 47 GPT-4o Mar 2025, 100 steps 29.3%
  48. 48 OpenCUA-7B 50 steps 28.2%
  49. 49 UI-TARS-1.5 100 steps 27.4%
  50. 50 UI-TARS-72B-DPO 100 steps 27.1%
  51. 51 opencua-qwen2-7b 100 steps 23.1%
  52. 52 opencua-a3b 50 steps 19.9%
  53. 53 kimi-vl-a3b 100 steps 10.3%
  54. 54 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 100 steps 5.00%
  55. 55 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 100 steps 3.88%

Source: Official OSWorld-Verified leaderboard

  1. 1 Qwen 3.8 Max 86.1%
  2. 2 Claude Fable 5 1M context, 100 steps 86%
  3. 3 Kimi K3 84.8%
  4. 4 Qwen 3.8 27B 84.3%
  5. 5 Claude Opus 4.7 100 steps 83.6%
  6. 6 Claude Opus 4.8 83.4%
  7. 7 Claude Opus 5 1M context, 100 steps 83.4%
  8. 8 Gemini 3.6 Flash 83%
  9. 9 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 82%
  10. 10 Claude Sonnet 4.6 100 steps 81.5%
  11. 11 Claude Sonnet 5 81.2%
  12. 12 Muse Spark 1.1 80.8%
  13. 13 Muse Spark Open 80.4%
  14. 14 Holo3-35B-A3B 100 steps 80.4%
  15. 15 Claude Mythos Preview 79.6%
  16. 16 GPT-5.5 78.7%
  17. 17 Gemini 3.5 Flash 78.4%
  18. 18 Gemini 3.1 Pro 100 steps 78.3%
  19. 19 Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps 76.3%
  20. 20 MiniMax-M3 75.2%
  21. 21 GPT-5.4 75%
  22. 22 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 74%
  23. 23 Qwen3.7-Plus 100 steps 73.3%
  24. 24 Kimi K2.6 73.1%
  25. 25 Claude Opus 4.6 72.7%
  26. 26 GPT-5.4 Mini 72.1%
  27. 27 GPT-5 100 steps 69.9%
  28. 28 Mage-VL-Cowork 66%
  29. 29 Muse Glimmer 65.9%
  30. 30 GPT-5.3 Codex 64.7%
  31. 31 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 64.4%
  32. 32 Kimi K2.5 100 steps 63.3%
  33. 33 Claude Sonnet 4.5 100 steps 62.9%
  34. 34 Qwen 3.6 Plus 62.5%
  35. 35 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 62.2%
  36. 36 Seed1.8 100 steps 61.9%
  37. 37 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 58%
  38. 38 Qwen3.5-27B 56.2%
  39. 39 o3 100 steps 56%
  40. 40 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 54.5%
  41. 41 UI-TARS-2 100 steps 53.1%
  42. 42 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 52.1%
  43. 43 Claude Haiku 4.5 50.7%
  44. 44 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 47.4%
  45. 45 EvoCUA-8B 50 steps 46.1%
  46. 46 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025, 50 steps 45.8%
  47. 47 Claude Sonnet 4 50 steps 43.9%
  48. 48 Qwen3.5-9B 41.8%
  49. 49 Qwen3-VL-Flash 100 steps 41.6%
  50. 50 GPT-5.4 Nano 39%
  51. 51 GUI-Owl-32B 50 steps 38.9%
  52. 52 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 50 steps 35.8%
  53. 53 Qwen3.5-4B 35.6%
  54. 54 OpenCUA-32B 100 steps 34.8%
  55. 55 Seed1.5-VL 100 steps 33.8%
  56. 56 GUI-Owl-7B 15 steps 32.1%
  57. 57 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 50 steps 31.3%
  58. 58 GPT-4o Mar 2025, 100 steps 29.3%
  59. 59 OpenCUA-7B 50 steps 28.2%
  60. 60 UI-TARS-1.5 100 steps 27.4%
  61. 61 UI-TARS-72B-DPO 100 steps 27.1%
  62. 62 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 22%
  63. 63 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 100 steps 5.00%
  64. 64 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 100 steps 3.88%

Sources: Labs’ model cards and official OSWorld-Verified leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Intelligence-Indeed Agent 90.2% 100 steps Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Fable 5 86% 1M context, 100 steps Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.7 83.6% 100 steps, Pointer Agent Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Opus 5 83.4% 1M context, 100 steps Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Coasty CUA v1 82.8% 100 steps Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.5% 100 steps, Pointer Agent Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Muse Spark 1.1 80.7% 100 steps Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Holo3-35B-A3B 80.4% 100 steps Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini 3.1 Pro 78.3% 100 steps, OpenAPA Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Claude Opus 4.5 76.3% 100 steps, VLAA-GUI Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
11 MiniMax-M3 75.2% 100 steps Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen3.7-Plus 73.3% 100 steps Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Kimi K2.6 73.1% 100 steps Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
14 agent s3 w/ Opus 4.5 + GPT-5 bBoN (N=10) 72.6% 100 steps Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-5 69.9% 100 steps, agent s3 bBoN (N=10) Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
16 GBOX Agent 64.2% 15 steps Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
17 Kimi K2.5 63.3% 100 steps Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Claude Sonnet 4.5 62.9% 100 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Agentic-Lybic-Maestro 61.9% 100 steps Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Seed1.8 61.9% 100 steps Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
21 CoACT-1 60.8% 150 steps Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
22 aworldGUIAgent-v1 58% 50 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
23 EvoCUA-20260105 56.7% 50 steps Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
24 o3 56% 100 steps, agent s2.5 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
25 GUI-Owl-1.5 32B 55.4% 50 steps Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
26 DeepMiner-Mano-72B 53.9% 100 steps Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
27 UI-TARS-2 53.1% 100 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
28 EvoCUA 50.3% 50 steps Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
29 autoglm-os-9b-20250925 48% 50 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
30 autoglm-os-9b 47.3% 50 steps Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
31 EvoCUA-8B 46.1% 50 steps Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
32 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 45.8% 50 steps, agent s2 Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
33 opencua-72b-preview 45% 100 steps Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
34 Claude Sonnet 4 43.9% 50 steps May 2025 Official leaderboard
35 UI-TARS-250705 41.8% 100 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
36 Qwen3-VL-Flash 41.6% 100 steps Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
37 DART-GUI-7B-0924 40.5% 30 steps Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
38 DeepMiner-Mano-7B 40.1% 100 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
39 doubao-1-5-thinking-vision-pro-250717 40% 100 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
40 GUI-Owl-32B 38.9% 50 steps, mobile-agent-v3 Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
41 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 35.8% 50 steps Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
42 OpenCUA-32B 34.8% 100 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
43 Seed1.5-VL 33.8% 100 steps May 2025 Official leaderboard
44 GUI-Owl-7B 32.1% 15 steps Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
45 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 31.3% 50 steps Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
46 TianXi-Action-7B 29.8% 50 steps Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
47 GPT-4o Mar 2025 29.3% 100 steps, Jedi-7B Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
48 OpenCUA-7B 28.2% 50 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
49 UI-TARS-1.5 27.4% 100 steps Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
50 UI-TARS-72B-DPO 27.1% 100 steps Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
51 opencua-qwen2-7b 23.1% 100 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
52 opencua-a3b 19.9% 50 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
53 kimi-vl-a3b 10.3% 100 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
54 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 5.00% 100 steps Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
55 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 3.88% 100 steps Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 86.1% Aug 2026 Lab model card
2 Claude Fable 5 86% 1M context, 100 steps Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Kimi K3 84.8% Jul 2026 Lab model card
4 Qwen 3.8 27B 84.3% Aug 2026 Lab model card
5 Claude Opus 4.7 83.6% 100 steps, Pointer Agent Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Opus 4.8 83.4% May 2026 Lab model card
7 Claude Opus 5 83.4% 1M context, 100 steps Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Gemini 3.6 Flash 83% Jul 2026 Lab model card
9 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 82% Sep 2026 Lab model card
10 Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.5% 100 steps, Pointer Agent Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
11 Claude Sonnet 5 81.2% Jun 2026 Lab model card
12 Muse Spark 1.1 80.8% Jul 2026 Lab model card
13 Muse Spark Open 80.4% Oct 2026 Lab model card
14 Holo3-35B-A3B 80.4% 100 steps Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Claude Mythos Preview 79.6% Apr 2026 Lab model card
16 GPT-5.5 78.7% Apr 2026 Lab model card
17 Gemini 3.5 Flash 78.4% May 2026 Lab model card
18 Gemini 3.1 Pro 78.3% 100 steps, OpenAPA Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
19 Claude Opus 4.5 76.3% 100 steps, VLAA-GUI Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
20 MiniMax-M3 75.2% Jun 2026 Lab model card
21 GPT-5.4 75% Mar 2026 Lab model card
22 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 74% Jul 2026 Lab model card
23 Qwen3.7-Plus 73.3% 100 steps Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
24 Kimi K2.6 73.1% Apr 2026 Lab model card
25 Claude Opus 4.6 72.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
26 GPT-5.4 Mini 72.1% Mar 2026 Lab model card
27 GPT-5 69.9% 100 steps, agent s3 bBoN (N=10) Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Mage-VL-Cowork 66% Oct 2026 Lab model card
29 Muse Glimmer 65.9% Aug 2026 Lab model card
30 GPT-5.3 Codex 64.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
31 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 64.4% Apr 2026 Lab model card
32 Kimi K2.5 63.3% 100 steps Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
33 Claude Sonnet 4.5 62.9% 100 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
34 Qwen 3.6 Plus 62.5% Apr 2026 Lab model card
35 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 62.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
36 Seed1.8 61.9% 100 steps Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
37 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 58% Feb 2026 Lab model card
38 Qwen3.5-27B 56.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
39 o3 56% 100 steps, agent s2.5 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
40 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 54.5% Feb 2026 Lab model card
41 UI-TARS-2 53.1% 100 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
42 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 52.1% Oct 2026 Lab model card
43 Claude Haiku 4.5 50.7% Oct 2025 Lab model card
44 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 47.4% Apr 2026 Lab model card
45 EvoCUA-8B 46.1% 50 steps Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
46 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 45.8% 50 steps, agent s2 Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
47 Claude Sonnet 4 43.9% 50 steps May 2025 Official leaderboard
48 Qwen3.5-9B 41.8% Mar 2026 Lab model card
49 Qwen3-VL-Flash 41.6% 100 steps Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
50 GPT-5.4 Nano 39% Mar 2026 Lab model card
51 GUI-Owl-32B 38.9% 50 steps, mobile-agent-v3 Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
52 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 35.8% 50 steps Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
53 Qwen3.5-4B 35.6% Mar 2026 Lab model card
54 OpenCUA-32B 34.8% 100 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
55 Seed1.5-VL 33.8% 100 steps May 2025 Official leaderboard
56 GUI-Owl-7B 32.1% 15 steps Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
57 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 31.3% 50 steps Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
58 GPT-4o Mar 2025 29.3% 100 steps, Jedi-7B Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
59 OpenCUA-7B 28.2% 50 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
60 UI-TARS-1.5 27.4% 100 steps Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
61 UI-TARS-72B-DPO 27.1% 100 steps Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
62 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 22% Oct 2024 Lab model card
63 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 5.00% 100 steps Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
64 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 3.88% 100 steps Mar 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 41 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
Claude Opus 4.5 UiPath Screen Agent
50 steps
67.1%
Claude Sonnet 4.5
15 steps 50 steps 100 steps
62.9%
o3 agent s2.5
15 steps 50 steps
56%
o3 GTA1
50 steps 100 steps
53.1%
o3 Jedi-7B
15 steps 50 steps
51%
Gemini 2.5 Pro agent s2
15 steps 50 steps
45.8%
Claude Sonnet 4
15 steps 100 steps
43.9%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
15 steps 100 steps
35.8%
OpenCUA-32B
15 steps 50 steps
34.8%
Seed1.5-VL
15 steps 100 steps
33.8%
computer-use-preview-2025-03-11
15 steps 100 steps
31.3%
GPT-4o Jedi-7B
15 steps
29.3%

Source: Official OSWorld-Verified leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
Claude Fable 5 1M context, 100 steps 86%
Claude Opus 4.7 100 steps Pointer Agent 83.6%
Claude Opus 5 1M context, 100 steps 83.4%
Claude Sonnet 4.6 100 steps Pointer Agent 81.5%
Muse Spark 1.1 100 steps 80.7%
Holo3-35B-A3B 100 steps 80.4%
Gemini 3.1 Pro 100 steps OpenAPA 78.3%
Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps VLAA-GUI 76.3%
MiniMax-M3 100 steps 75.2%
Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps HIPPO Agent 74.5%
Qwen3.7-Plus 100 steps 73.3%
Kimi K2.6 100 steps 73.1%
Claude Sonnet 4.6 100 steps 72.1%
GPT-5 100 steps agent s3 bBoN (N=10) 69.9%
Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps UiPath Screen Agent 67.1%
Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps agent s3 bBoN (N=1) 66%
GPT-5 50 steps OS-Symphony 65.8%
Claude Opus 4.5 50 steps UiPath Screen Agent 64.4%
GPT-5 100 steps GTA1 63.4%
Kimi K2.5 100 steps 63.3%
Claude Sonnet 4.5 100 steps 62.9%
GPT-5 100 steps agent s3 bBoN (N=1) 62.6%
Seed1.8 100 steps 61.9%
Claude Sonnet 4.5 50 steps 58.1%
o3 100 steps agent s2.5 56%
o3 50 steps agent s2.5 54.2%
GPT-5 50 steps UiPath Screen Agent 53.6%
o3 100 steps GTA1 53.1%
UI-TARS-2 100 steps 53.1%
o3 100 steps Jedi-7B 51%
o3 50 steps Jedi-7B 50.6%
o3 50 steps GTA1 48.6%
EvoCUA-8B 50 steps 46.1%
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 50 steps agent s2 45.8%
Claude Sonnet 4 50 steps 43.9%
Claude Sonnet 4.5 15 steps 42.9%
o3 15 steps Jedi-7B 42.4%
Qwen3-VL-Flash 100 steps 41.6%
Claude Sonnet 4 100 steps 41.4%
o3 15 steps agent s2.5 39%
GUI-Owl-32B 50 steps mobile-agent-v3 38.9%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet 50 steps 35.8%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet 100 steps 35.6%
OpenCUA-32B 100 steps 34.8%
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 15 steps agent s2 34.6%
OpenCUA-32B 50 steps 34.1%
Seed1.5-VL 100 steps 33.8%
GUI-Owl-7B 15 steps 32.1%
computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 50 steps 31.3%
Claude Sonnet 4 15 steps 31.2%
computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 100 steps 30.5%
OpenCUA-32B 15 steps 29.7%
GPT-4o Mar 2025 100 steps Jedi-7B 29.3%
OpenCUA-7B 50 steps 28.2%
Seed1.5-VL 15 steps 27.8%
UI-TARS-1.5 100 steps 27.4%
UI-TARS-1.5 50 steps 27.3%
UI-TARS-72B-DPO 100 steps 27.1%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet 15 steps 27.1%
GPT-4o Mar 2025 50 steps Jedi-7B 27%
GPT-4o Mar 2025 15 steps Jedi-7B 26.8%
OpenCUA-7B 100 steps 26.6%
computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 15 steps 26%
UI-TARS-72B-DPO 50 steps 25.8%
UI-TARS-1.5 15 steps 24.5%
OpenCUA-7B 15 steps 24.3%
UI-TARS-72B-DPO 15 steps 24%
o3 100 steps 23%
o3 50 steps 17.2%
o3 15 steps 9.10%
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 100 steps 5.00%
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 15 steps 4.43%
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 100 steps 3.88%
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 15 steps 3.04%

6 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in July 2025 7 models have held number one with claims included since its release in July 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Anthropic Qwen
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Jun 2026, by Claude Fable 5
Lab claims Passed 85% in Jun 2026, by Claude Fable 5
Qwen 3.8 Max 86.1%

Sources: Official OSWorld-Verified leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Claude Fable 5 on the official leaderboard passed 85% in June 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Opus 4.5 GPT-5 o3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet UI-TARS-72B-DPO 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Claude Opus 4.5

Sources: Official OSWorld-Verified leaderboard and labs’ model cards

9 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Anthropic
OpenAI
Qwen
Moonshot AI
ByteDance Seed
NVIDIA
Google DeepMind
MiniMax
Meta
Xiaomi Corp
Microsoft
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 30, 2026 Mage-VL-Cowork 66 OSWorld-Verified, 361 tasks excluding Google Drive, 50 steps, two-run average
Oct 15, 2026 Muse Spark Open 80.4 OSWorld Verified
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 51.1 OSWorld-Verified
Sep 22, 2026 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 82 OSWorld-Verified
Aug 14, 2026 Qwen 3.8 27B 84.3 Computer use OSWorld-Verified
Aug 10, 2026 Muse Glimmer 65.9 OSWorld-Verified
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 86.1 OSWorld-Verified
Jul 21, 2026 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 74 OSWorld-Verified
Jul 21, 2026 Gemini 3.6 Flash 83 OSWorld-Verified
Jul 16, 2026 Kimi K3 84.8 OSWorld-Verified
Jul 9, 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 80.8 OSWorld-Verified (Agentic computer use)
Jun 30, 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 81.2 Computer use OSWorld-Verified
Jun 9, 2026 Claude Fable 5 85 Computer use OSWorld-Verified
Jun 1, 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 73.3 OSWorld-Verified (enable_thinking=False)
Jun 1, 2026 MiniMax-M3 75.2 OSWorld-Verified
May 28, 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 83.4 Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified
May 19, 2026 Gemini 3.5 Flash 78.4 OSWorld-Verified
Apr 28, 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 47.4 OSWorld
Apr 28, 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 64.4 OSWorld-Verfied
Apr 23, 2026 GPT-5.5 78.7 OSWorld-Verified
Apr 20, 2026 Kimi K2.6 73.1 OSWorld-Verified
Apr 16, 2026 Claude Opus 4.7 78 Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified
Apr 7, 2026 Claude Mythos Preview 79.6 OSWorld
Apr 2, 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 62.5 OSWorld-Verified
Mar 17, 2026 GPT-5.4 Nano 39 OSWorld-Verified
Mar 17, 2026 GPT-5.4 Mini 72.1 OSWorld-Verified
Mar 5, 2026 GPT-5.4 75 OSWorld-Verified
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-4B 35.6 OSWorld-Verified
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-9B 41.8 OSWorld-Verified
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 54.5 OSWorld-Verified
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-27B 56.2 OSWorld-Verified
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 58 OSWorld-Verified
Feb 17, 2026 Claude Sonnet 4.6 72.5 Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified
Feb 16, 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 62.2 OSWorld-Verified
Feb 5, 2026 Claude Opus 4.6 72.7 Agentic computer use OSWorld
Feb 5, 2026 GPT-5.3 Codex 64.7 OSWorld-Verified
Nov 24, 2025 Claude Opus 4.5 66.3 Computer use OSWorld
Oct 15, 2025 Claude Haiku 4.5 50.7 Computer use OSWorld
Sep 29, 2025 Claude Sonnet 4.5 61.4 Computer use OSWorld (official OSWorld-Verified framework, 100 max steps)
Oct 22, 2024 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 22 OSWorld (screenshot only, 50 steps) Overall

19 system cards report it, from 7 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 30, 2026 Mage-VL-Cowork technical report 66 OSWorld-Verified Overall, 50 steps, OS 87.5, Office 64.9, Daily 65.0, Professional 66.3, Workflow 62.7 (Table 2) Capabilities
Oct 19, 2026 Muse Glimmer technical report 65.9 OSWorld-Verified, high, 69.7 xhigh (Tables 2 and 5) Capabilities
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL technical report 52.1 OSWorld (OSWorld-Verified, 361 tasks without Google Drive, screenshots only, 100 steps) (Table 10) Capabilities
Sep 22, 2026 MiMo-V2.6 Pro technical report 82 OSWorld-Verified (Table 3) Capabilities
Jul 27, 2026 Kimi K3 technical report 84.8 OSWorld-Verified (Table 2) Capabilities
Jul 21, 2026 Gemini 3.6 Flash model card 83 OSWorld-Verified (results table, p.4) Capabilities
Jul 21, 2026 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite model card 74 OSWorld-Verified (results table, p.4) Capabilities
Jul 9, 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 system card 80.8 OSWorld-Verified, mean per-task reward, 361 tasks (Figure 44) Capabilities
Jun 30, 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 system card 81.2 OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate averaged over five runs, max effort, 100 steps (Table 8.1.A, 8.10.2) Capabilities
Jun 9, 2026 Claude Fable 5 system card 85 OSWorld-Verified, 361 tasks, 100 steps, pass@1 averaged over five runs, max effort, after the zoom-tool fix and 128K per-turn tokens (Table 8.1.A) Capabilities
May 28, 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 system card 83.4 OSWorld-Verified first-attempt success rate, 361 tasks, 100 steps, max effort, five runs, zoom tool fix and 128K tokens per turn (Table 8.1.A, 8.12.6) Capabilities
May 19, 2026 Gemini 3.5 Flash model card 78.4 OSWorld-Verified (results table, p.4) Capabilities
Apr 27, 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B technical report 47.4 OSWorld, reasoning on, version not stated, mapped to OSWorld-Verified as in the launch record (Table 7) Capabilities
Apr 16, 2026 Claude Opus 4.7 system card 78 OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate, average of five runs (Table 8.1.A, 8.9.4) Capabilities
Apr 7, 2026 Claude Mythos Preview system card 79.6 OSWorld (named OSWorld in the card), first-attempt success rate, average of five runs, 1080p, 100 steps (Table 6.3.A, 6.11.4) Capabilities
Feb 17, 2026 Claude Sonnet 4.6 system card 72.5 OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate, average of five runs (Table 2.1.A, 2.6) Capabilities
Feb 5, 2026 Claude Opus 4.6 system card 72.7 OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate, average of five runs, 1080p, 100 steps (Table 2.3.A, 2.8) Capabilities
Jan 30, 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 63.3 OSWorld-Verified, GUI actions only (Table 4) Capabilities
Nov 24, 2025 Claude Opus 4.5 system card 66.3 OSWorld, P@1 avg@5, 1080p, 100 steps, 64k thinking (Table 2.3.A; 66.26% in 2.9) Capabilities

The lab's number comes out ahead in 0 of 5 pairs that differ

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 5 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Claude Opus 4.5 66.3% Computer use OSWorld 76.3% Leaderboard, 100 steps, VLAA-GUI −10.0 pts
Claude Sonnet 4.6 72.5% Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified 81.5% Leaderboard, 100 steps, Pointer Agent −9.0 pts
Claude Opus 4.7 78% Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified 83.6% Leaderboard, 100 steps, Pointer Agent −5.6 pts
Claude Sonnet 4.5 61.4% Computer use OSWorld (official OSWorld-Verified framework, 100 max steps) 62.9% Leaderboard, 100 steps −1.5 pts
Claude Fable 5 85% Computer use OSWorld-Verified 86% Leaderboard, 1M context, 100 steps −1.0 pts
Muse Spark 1.1 80.8% OSWorld-Verified (Agentic computer use) 80.7% Leaderboard, 100 steps Same
Kimi K2.6 73.1% OSWorld-Verified 73.1% Leaderboard, 100 steps Same
MiniMax-M3 75.2% OSWorld-Verified 75.2% Leaderboard, 100 steps Same
Qwen3.7-Plus 73.3% OSWorld-Verified (enable_thinking=False) 73.3% Leaderboard, 100 steps Same
Kimi K2.5 63.3% OSWorld-Verified, GUI actions only (Table 4) 63.3% Leaderboard, 100 steps Same

One logged change that moves scores

Changes by the maintainers, so a score from before a change may not compare with one from after it. Newest first, each with the maintainers' own source. The list may be incomplete. What we log.

  1. Grader changed November 2nd, 2026

    The maintainers replaced permissive document and spreadsheet checks with stricter content checks. Incorrect outputs that previously passed can now fail. Source

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Qwen Anthropic Moonshot AI OpenAI
OSWorld 2.1 14 leaders
OSWorld Not tested since Feb 2026
OSWorld-Verified Passed 85% in Jun 2026, by Claude Fable 5
OSWorld 2.0 Replaced by 2.0 Aug, Aug 2026
OSWorld 2.1 1 leader

Sources: Official leaderboards, boards copied by Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) and labs’ model cards

More in Computer and browser use

All 69 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%
  • RecreationBench In use Agents explore a running reference app and rebuild it, across 250 tasks on five platforms. Programmatic tests and a VLM judge score the result. GPT-6 Astra 58.1%