OSWorld-Verified
369 open-ended tasks in real desktop apps. Agent acts through screenshots, mouse and keyboard. Execution-based checkers score success.
Human baseline 72.4%. Top reported scores are ~83-86%, so near-saturated. Successor OSWorld 2.0 released 2026-06 (repo xlang-ai/OSWorld-V2).
- Made by
- XLANG Lab (HKU) + collaborators
- Released
- July 2025
- Kind
- Desktop apps
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Opus 5 #10 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- October 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Autonomous agents that accomplish complex computer tasks with minimal human interventions have the potential to transform human-computer interaction, significantly enhancing accessibility and productivity. However, existing benchmarks either lack an interactive environment or are limited to environments specific to certain applications or domains, failing to reflect the diverse and complex nature of real-world computer use, thereby limiting the scope of tasks and agent scalability. To address this issue, we introduce OSWorld, the first-of-its-kind scalable, real computer environment for multimodal agents, supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across various operating systems such as Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS. OSWorld can serve as a unified, integrated computer environment for assessing open-ended computer tasks that involve arbitrary applications. Building upon OSWorld, we create a benchmark of 369 computer tasks involving real web and desktop apps in open domains, OS file I/O, and workflows spanning multiple applications. Each task example is derived from real-world computer use cases and includes a detailed initial state setup configuration and a custom execution-based evaluation script for reliable, reproducible evaluation. Extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLM/VLM-based agents on OSWorld reveals significant deficiencies in their ability to serve as computer assistants. While humans can accomplish over 72.36% of the tasks, the best model achieves only 12.24% success, primarily struggling with GUI grounding and operational knowledge. Comprehensive analysis using OSWorld provides valuable insights for developing multimodal generalist agents that were not possible with previous benchmarks. Our code, environment, baseline models, and data are publicly available at https://os-world.github.io.
Intelligence-Indeed Agent tops the leaderboard with 90.2%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude Fable 5, at 86%.
Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 86.1%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 14 more
- 90.2 Intelligence-Indeed Agent
- 86.0 Claude Fable 5
- 83.6 Claude Opus 4.7
- 83.4 Claude Opus 5
- 82.8 Coasty CUA v1
- 81.5 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 80.7
Muse Spark 1.1
- 80.4 Holo3-35B-A3B
- 78.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 76.3 Claude Opus 4.5
- 75.2
MiniMax-M3
- 73.3
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 73.1 Kimi K2.6
- 72.6 agent s3 w/ Opus 4.5 + GPT-5 bBoN (N=10)
- 69.9 GPT-5
- 64.2 GBOX Agent
- 63.3 Kimi K2.5
- 62.9 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 61.9 Agentic-Lybic-Maestro
- 61.9
Seed1.8
- 60.8 CoACT-1
- 58.0 aworldGUIAgent-v1
- 56.7 EvoCUA-20260105
- 56.0 o3
- 55.4 GUI-Owl-1.5 32B
- 53.9 DeepMiner-Mano-72B
- 53.1
UI-TARS-2
- 50.3 EvoCUA
- 48.0 autoglm-os-9b-20250925
- 47.3 autoglm-os-9b
- 46.1
EvoCUA-8B
- 45.8
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 45.0 opencua-72b-preview
- 43.9 Claude Sonnet 4
- 41.8 UI-TARS-250705
- 41.6
Qwen3-VL-Flash
- 40.5 DART-GUI-7B-0924
- 40.1 DeepMiner-Mano-7B
- 40.0 doubao-1-5-thinking-vision-pro-250717
- 38.9
GUI-Owl-32B
- 35.8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 34.8 OpenCUA-32B
- 33.8
Seed1.5-VL
- 32.1
GUI-Owl-7B
- 31.3 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11
- 29.8 TianXi-Action-7B
- 29.3 GPT-4o
- 28.2 OpenCUA-7B
- 27.4
UI-TARS-1.5
- 27.1
UI-TARS-72B-DPO
- 23.1 opencua-qwen2-7b
- 19.9 opencua-a3b
- 10.3 kimi-vl-a3b
- 5.00
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 3.88
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
- 1 Intelligence-Indeed Agent 100 steps 90.2%
- 2 Claude Fable 5 1M context, 100 steps 86%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.7 100 steps 83.6%
- 4 Claude Opus 5 1M context, 100 steps 83.4%
- 5 Coasty CUA v1 100 steps 82.8%
- 6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 100 steps 81.5%
- 7
Muse Spark 1.1 100 steps 80.7%
- 8 Holo3-35B-A3B 100 steps 80.4%
- 9
Gemini 3.1 Pro 100 steps 78.3%
- 10 Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps 76.3%
- 11
MiniMax-M3 100 steps 75.2%
- 12
Qwen3.7-Plus 100 steps 73.3%
- 13 Kimi K2.6 100 steps 73.1%
- 14 agent s3 w/ Opus 4.5 + GPT-5 bBoN (N=10) 100 steps 72.6%
- 15 GPT-5 100 steps 69.9%
- 16 GBOX Agent 15 steps 64.2%
- 17 Kimi K2.5 100 steps 63.3%
- 18 Claude Sonnet 4.5 100 steps 62.9%
- 19 Agentic-Lybic-Maestro 100 steps 61.9%
- 20
Seed1.8 100 steps 61.9%
- 21 CoACT-1 150 steps 60.8%
- 22 aworldGUIAgent-v1 50 steps 58%
- 23 EvoCUA-20260105 50 steps 56.7%
- 24 o3 100 steps 56%
- 25 GUI-Owl-1.5 32B 50 steps 55.4%
- 26 DeepMiner-Mano-72B 100 steps 53.9%
- 27
UI-TARS-2 100 steps 53.1%
- 28 EvoCUA 50 steps 50.3%
- 29 autoglm-os-9b-20250925 50 steps 48%
- 30 autoglm-os-9b 50 steps 47.3%
- 31
EvoCUA-8B 50 steps 46.1%
- 32
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025, 50 steps 45.8%
- 33 opencua-72b-preview 100 steps 45%
- 34 Claude Sonnet 4 50 steps 43.9%
- 35 UI-TARS-250705 100 steps 41.8%
- 36
Qwen3-VL-Flash 100 steps 41.6%
- 37 DART-GUI-7B-0924 30 steps 40.5%
- 38 DeepMiner-Mano-7B 100 steps 40.1%
- 39 doubao-1-5-thinking-vision-pro-250717 100 steps 40%
- 40
GUI-Owl-32B 50 steps 38.9%
- 41 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 50 steps 35.8%
- 42 OpenCUA-32B 100 steps 34.8%
- 43
Seed1.5-VL 100 steps 33.8%
- 44
GUI-Owl-7B 15 steps 32.1%
- 45 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 50 steps 31.3%
- 46 TianXi-Action-7B 50 steps 29.8%
- 47 GPT-4o Mar 2025, 100 steps 29.3%
- 48 OpenCUA-7B 50 steps 28.2%
- 49
UI-TARS-1.5 100 steps 27.4%
- 50
UI-TARS-72B-DPO 100 steps 27.1%
- 51 opencua-qwen2-7b 100 steps 23.1%
- 52 opencua-a3b 50 steps 19.9%
- 53 kimi-vl-a3b 100 steps 10.3%
- 54
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 100 steps 5.00%
- 55
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 100 steps 3.88%
Source: Official OSWorld-Verified leaderboard
- 86.1
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 86.0 Claude Fable 5
- 84.8 Kimi K3
- 84.3
Qwen 3.8 27B
- 83.6 Claude Opus 4.7
- 83.4 Claude Opus 4.8
- 83.4 Claude Opus 5
- 83.0
Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 82.0 MiMo-V2.6 Pro
- 81.5 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 81.2 Claude Sonnet 5
- 80.8
Muse Spark 1.1
- 80.4
Muse Spark Open
- 80.4 Holo3-35B-A3B
- 79.6 Claude Mythos Preview
- 78.7 GPT-5.5
- 78.4
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 78.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 76.3 Claude Opus 4.5
- 75.2
MiniMax-M3
- 75.0 GPT-5.4
- 74.0
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 73.3
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 73.1 Kimi K2.6
- 72.7 Claude Opus 4.6
- 72.1 GPT-5.4 Mini
- 69.9 GPT-5
- 66.0
Mage-VL-Cowork
- 65.9
Muse Glimmer
- 64.7 GPT-5.3 Codex
- 64.4
Seed2.0 Lite (0428)
- 63.3 Kimi K2.5
- 62.9 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 62.5
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 62.2
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 61.9
Seed1.8
- 58.0
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 56.2
Qwen3.5-27B
- 56.0 o3
- 54.5
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 53.1
UI-TARS-2
- 52.1
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- 50.7 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 47.4
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
- 46.1
EvoCUA-8B
- 45.8
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 43.9 Claude Sonnet 4
- 41.8
Qwen3.5-9B
- 41.6
Qwen3-VL-Flash
- 39.0 GPT-5.4 Nano
- 38.9
GUI-Owl-32B
- 35.8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 35.6
Qwen3.5-4B
- 34.8 OpenCUA-32B
- 33.8
Seed1.5-VL
- 32.1
GUI-Owl-7B
- 31.3 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11
- 29.3 GPT-4o
- 28.2 OpenCUA-7B
- 27.4
UI-TARS-1.5
- 27.1
UI-TARS-72B-DPO
- 22.0 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 5.00
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 3.88
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
- 1
Qwen 3.8 Max 86.1%
- 2 Claude Fable 5 1M context, 100 steps 86%
- 3 Kimi K3 84.8%
- 4
Qwen 3.8 27B 84.3%
- 5 Claude Opus 4.7 100 steps 83.6%
- 6 Claude Opus 4.8 83.4%
- 7 Claude Opus 5 1M context, 100 steps 83.4%
- 8
Gemini 3.6 Flash 83%
- 9 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 82%
- 10 Claude Sonnet 4.6 100 steps 81.5%
- 11 Claude Sonnet 5 81.2%
- 12
Muse Spark 1.1 80.8%
- 13
Muse Spark Open 80.4%
- 14 Holo3-35B-A3B 100 steps 80.4%
- 15 Claude Mythos Preview 79.6%
- 16 GPT-5.5 78.7%
- 17
Gemini 3.5 Flash 78.4%
- 18
Gemini 3.1 Pro 100 steps 78.3%
- 19 Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps 76.3%
- 20
MiniMax-M3 75.2%
- 21 GPT-5.4 75%
- 22
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 74%
- 23
Qwen3.7-Plus 100 steps 73.3%
- 24 Kimi K2.6 73.1%
- 25 Claude Opus 4.6 72.7%
- 26 GPT-5.4 Mini 72.1%
- 27 GPT-5 100 steps 69.9%
- 28
Mage-VL-Cowork 66%
- 29
Muse Glimmer 65.9%
- 30 GPT-5.3 Codex 64.7%
- 31
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 64.4%
- 32 Kimi K2.5 100 steps 63.3%
- 33 Claude Sonnet 4.5 100 steps 62.9%
- 34
Qwen 3.6 Plus 62.5%
- 35
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 62.2%
- 36
Seed1.8 100 steps 61.9%
- 37
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 58%
- 38
Qwen3.5-27B 56.2%
- 39 o3 100 steps 56%
- 40
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 54.5%
- 41
UI-TARS-2 100 steps 53.1%
- 42
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 52.1%
- 43 Claude Haiku 4.5 50.7%
- 44
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 47.4%
- 45
EvoCUA-8B 50 steps 46.1%
- 46
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025, 50 steps 45.8%
- 47 Claude Sonnet 4 50 steps 43.9%
- 48
Qwen3.5-9B 41.8%
- 49
Qwen3-VL-Flash 100 steps 41.6%
- 50 GPT-5.4 Nano 39%
- 51
GUI-Owl-32B 50 steps 38.9%
- 52 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 50 steps 35.8%
- 53
Qwen3.5-4B 35.6%
- 54 OpenCUA-32B 100 steps 34.8%
- 55
Seed1.5-VL 100 steps 33.8%
- 56
GUI-Owl-7B 15 steps 32.1%
- 57 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 50 steps 31.3%
- 58 GPT-4o Mar 2025, 100 steps 29.3%
- 59 OpenCUA-7B 50 steps 28.2%
- 60
UI-TARS-1.5 100 steps 27.4%
- 61
UI-TARS-72B-DPO 100 steps 27.1%
- 62 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 22%
- 63
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 100 steps 5.00%
- 64
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 100 steps 3.88%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official OSWorld-Verified leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intelligence-Indeed Agent | 90.2% | 100 steps | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5 | 86% | 1M context, 100 steps | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 83.6% | 100 steps, Pointer Agent | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Opus 5 | 83.4% | 1M context, 100 steps | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Coasty CUA v1 | 82.8% | 100 steps | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 81.5% | 100 steps, Pointer Agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 80.7% | 100 steps | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Holo3-35B-A3B | 80.4% | 100 steps | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 78.3% | 100 steps, OpenAPA | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 76.3% | 100 steps, VLAA-GUI | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 75.2% | 100 steps | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 73.3% | 100 steps | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Kimi K2.6 | 73.1% | 100 steps | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | agent s3 w/ Opus 4.5 + GPT-5 bBoN (N=10) | 72.6% | 100 steps | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | GPT-5 | 69.9% | 100 steps, agent s3 bBoN (N=10) | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | GBOX Agent | 64.2% | 15 steps | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | Kimi K2.5 | 63.3% | 100 steps | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 62.9% | 100 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | Agentic-Lybic-Maestro | 61.9% | 100 steps | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 61.9% | 100 steps | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | CoACT-1 | 60.8% | 150 steps | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | aworldGUIAgent-v1 | 58% | 50 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | EvoCUA-20260105 | 56.7% | 50 steps | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | o3 | 56% | 100 steps, agent s2.5 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | GUI-Owl-1.5 32B | 55.4% | 50 steps | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | DeepMiner-Mano-72B | 53.9% | 100 steps | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | | 53.1% | 100 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | EvoCUA | 50.3% | 50 steps | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 29 | autoglm-os-9b-20250925 | 48% | 50 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | autoglm-os-9b | 47.3% | 50 steps | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 31 | | 46.1% | 50 steps | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 32 | | 45.8% | 50 steps, agent s2 | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | opencua-72b-preview | 45% | 100 steps | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 34 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 43.9% | 50 steps | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 35 | UI-TARS-250705 | 41.8% | 100 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 36 | | 41.6% | 100 steps | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 37 | DART-GUI-7B-0924 | 40.5% | 30 steps | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 38 | DeepMiner-Mano-7B | 40.1% | 100 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 39 | doubao-1-5-thinking-vision-pro-250717 | 40% | 100 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 40 | | 38.9% | 50 steps, mobile-agent-v3 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 41 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 35.8% | 50 steps | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 42 | OpenCUA-32B | 34.8% | 100 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 43 | | 33.8% | 100 steps | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 44 | | 32.1% | 15 steps | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 45 | computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 | 31.3% | 50 steps | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 46 | TianXi-Action-7B | 29.8% | 50 steps | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 47 | GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 29.3% | 100 steps, Jedi-7B | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 48 | OpenCUA-7B | 28.2% | 50 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 49 | | 27.4% | 100 steps | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 50 | | 27.1% | 100 steps | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 51 | opencua-qwen2-7b | 23.1% | 100 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 52 | opencua-a3b | 19.9% | 50 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 53 | kimi-vl-a3b | 10.3% | 100 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 54 | | 5.00% | 100 steps | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 55 | | 3.88% | 100 steps | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 86.1% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5 | 86% | 1M context, 100 steps | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Kimi K3 | 84.8% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 84.3% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 83.6% | 100 steps, Pointer Agent | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 83.4% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | Claude Opus 5 | 83.4% | 1M context, 100 steps | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 83% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | MiMo-V2.6 Pro | 82% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 81.5% | 100 steps, Pointer Agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 81.2% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 80.8% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 80.4% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | Holo3-35B-A3B | 80.4% | 100 steps | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Claude Mythos Preview | 79.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | GPT-5.5 | 78.7% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 78.4% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 78.3% | 100 steps, OpenAPA | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 76.3% | 100 steps, VLAA-GUI | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 75.2% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | GPT-5.4 | 75% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 74% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 73.3% | 100 steps | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | Kimi K2.6 | 73.1% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 72.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 72.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | GPT-5 | 69.9% | 100 steps, agent s3 bBoN (N=10) | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | | 66% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | | 65.9% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | GPT-5.3 Codex | 64.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 31 | | 64.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 32 | Kimi K2.5 | 63.3% | 100 steps | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 62.9% | 100 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 34 | | 62.5% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 35 | | 62.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 36 | | 61.9% | 100 steps | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 37 | | 58% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 38 | | 56.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 39 | o3 | 56% | 100 steps, agent s2.5 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 40 | | 54.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 41 | | 53.1% | 100 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 42 | | 52.1% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 43 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 50.7% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 44 | | 47.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 45 | | 46.1% | 50 steps | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 46 | | 45.8% | 50 steps, agent s2 | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 47 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 43.9% | 50 steps | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 48 | | 41.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 49 | | 41.6% | 100 steps | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 50 | GPT-5.4 Nano | 39% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 51 | | 38.9% | 50 steps, mobile-agent-v3 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 52 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 35.8% | 50 steps | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 53 | | 35.6% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 54 | OpenCUA-32B | 34.8% | 100 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 55 | | 33.8% | 100 steps | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 56 | | 32.1% | 15 steps | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 57 | computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 | 31.3% | 50 steps | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 58 | GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 29.3% | 100 steps, Jedi-7B | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 59 | OpenCUA-7B | 28.2% | 50 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 60 | | 27.4% | 100 steps | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 61 | | 27.1% | 100 steps | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 62 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 22% | Oct 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 63 | | 5.00% | 100 steps | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 64 | | 3.88% | 100 steps | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 41 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official OSWorld-Verified leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5 | 1M context, 100 steps | 86% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.7 | 100 steps | Pointer Agent | 83.6% | ||
| Claude Opus 5 | 1M context, 100 steps | 83.4% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 100 steps | Pointer Agent | 81.5% | ||
| | 100 steps | 80.7% | |||
| Holo3-35B-A3B | 100 steps | 80.4% | |||
| | 100 steps | OpenAPA | 78.3% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 100 steps | VLAA-GUI | 76.3% | ||
| | 100 steps | 75.2% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 100 steps | HIPPO Agent | 74.5% | ||
| | 100 steps | 73.3% | |||
| Kimi K2.6 | 100 steps | 73.1% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 100 steps | 72.1% | |||
| GPT-5 | 100 steps | agent s3 bBoN (N=10) | 69.9% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 100 steps | UiPath Screen Agent | 67.1% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 100 steps | agent s3 bBoN (N=1) | 66% | ||
| GPT-5 | 50 steps | OS-Symphony | 65.8% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 50 steps | UiPath Screen Agent | 64.4% | ||
| GPT-5 | 100 steps | GTA1 | 63.4% | ||
| Kimi K2.5 | 100 steps | 63.3% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 100 steps | 62.9% | |||
| GPT-5 | 100 steps | agent s3 bBoN (N=1) | 62.6% | ||
| | 100 steps | 61.9% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 50 steps | 58.1% | |||
| o3 | 100 steps | agent s2.5 | 56% | ||
| o3 | 50 steps | agent s2.5 | 54.2% | ||
| GPT-5 | 50 steps | UiPath Screen Agent | 53.6% | ||
| o3 | 100 steps | GTA1 | 53.1% | ||
| | 100 steps | 53.1% | |||
| o3 | 100 steps | Jedi-7B | 51% | ||
| o3 | 50 steps | Jedi-7B | 50.6% | ||
| o3 | 50 steps | GTA1 | 48.6% | ||
| | 50 steps | 46.1% | |||
| | 50 steps | agent s2 | 45.8% | ||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | 50 steps | 43.9% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 15 steps | 42.9% | |||
| o3 | 15 steps | Jedi-7B | 42.4% | ||
| | 100 steps | 41.6% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | 100 steps | 41.4% | |||
| o3 | 15 steps | agent s2.5 | 39% | ||
| | 50 steps | mobile-agent-v3 | 38.9% | ||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 50 steps | 35.8% | |||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 100 steps | 35.6% | |||
| OpenCUA-32B | 100 steps | 34.8% | |||
| | 15 steps | agent s2 | 34.6% | ||
| OpenCUA-32B | 50 steps | 34.1% | |||
| | 100 steps | 33.8% | |||
| | 15 steps | 32.1% | |||
| computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 | 50 steps | 31.3% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | 15 steps | 31.2% | |||
| computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 | 100 steps | 30.5% | |||
| OpenCUA-32B | 15 steps | 29.7% | |||
| GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 100 steps | Jedi-7B | 29.3% | ||
| OpenCUA-7B | 50 steps | 28.2% | |||
| | 15 steps | 27.8% | |||
| | 100 steps | 27.4% | |||
| | 50 steps | 27.3% | |||
| | 100 steps | 27.1% | |||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 15 steps | 27.1% | |||
| GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 50 steps | Jedi-7B | 27% | ||
| GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 15 steps | Jedi-7B | 26.8% | ||
| OpenCUA-7B | 100 steps | 26.6% | |||
| computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 | 15 steps | 26% | |||
| | 50 steps | 25.8% | |||
| | 15 steps | 24.5% | |||
| OpenCUA-7B | 15 steps | 24.3% | |||
| | 15 steps | 24% | |||
| o3 | 100 steps | 23% | |||
| o3 | 50 steps | 17.2% | |||
| o3 | 15 steps | 9.10% | |||
| | 100 steps | 5.00% | |||
| | 15 steps | 4.43% | |||
| | 100 steps | 3.88% | |||
| | 15 steps | 3.04% |
6 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in July 2025 7 models have held number one with claims included since its release in July 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official OSWorld-Verified leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Claude Fable 5 on the official leaderboard passed 85% in June 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official OSWorld-Verified leaderboard and labs’ model cards
9 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2026 | 66 | OSWorld-Verified, 361 tasks excluding Google Drive, 50 steps, two-run average | |
| Oct 15, 2026 | 80.4 | OSWorld Verified | |
| Oct 15, 2026 | 51.1 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| Sep 22, 2026 | MiMo-V2.6 Pro | 82 | OSWorld-Verified |
| Aug 14, 2026 | 84.3 | Computer use OSWorld-Verified | |
| Aug 10, 2026 | 65.9 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| Aug 3, 2026 | 86.1 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| Jul 21, 2026 | 74 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| Jul 21, 2026 | 83 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| Jul 16, 2026 | Kimi K3 | 84.8 | OSWorld-Verified |
| Jul 9, 2026 | 80.8 | OSWorld-Verified (Agentic computer use) | |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 81.2 | Computer use OSWorld-Verified |
| Jun 9, 2026 | Claude Fable 5 | 85 | Computer use OSWorld-Verified |
| Jun 1, 2026 | 73.3 | OSWorld-Verified (enable_thinking=False) | |
| Jun 1, 2026 | 75.2 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| May 28, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 83.4 | Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified |
| May 19, 2026 | 78.4 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 47.4 | OSWorld | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 64.4 | OSWorld-Verfied | |
| Apr 23, 2026 | GPT-5.5 | 78.7 | OSWorld-Verified |
| Apr 20, 2026 | Kimi K2.6 | 73.1 | OSWorld-Verified |
| Apr 16, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 78 | Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified |
| Apr 7, 2026 | Claude Mythos Preview | 79.6 | OSWorld |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 62.5 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| Mar 17, 2026 | GPT-5.4 Nano | 39 | OSWorld-Verified |
| Mar 17, 2026 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 72.1 | OSWorld-Verified |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GPT-5.4 | 75 | OSWorld-Verified |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 35.6 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 41.8 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 54.5 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 56.2 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 58 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 72.5 | Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 62.2 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 72.7 | Agentic computer use OSWorld |
| Feb 5, 2026 | GPT-5.3 Codex | 64.7 | OSWorld-Verified |
| Nov 24, 2025 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 66.3 | Computer use OSWorld |
| Oct 15, 2025 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 50.7 | Computer use OSWorld |
| Sep 29, 2025 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 61.4 | Computer use OSWorld (official OSWorld-Verified framework, 100 max steps) |
| Oct 22, 2024 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 22 | OSWorld (screenshot only, 50 steps) Overall |
19 system cards report it, from 7 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2026 | | 66 | OSWorld-Verified Overall, 50 steps, OS 87.5, Office 64.9, Daily 65.0, Professional 66.3, Workflow 62.7 (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Oct 19, 2026 | | 65.9 | OSWorld-Verified, high, 69.7 xhigh (Tables 2 and 5) | Capabilities |
| Oct 15, 2026 | | 52.1 | OSWorld (OSWorld-Verified, 361 tasks without Google Drive, screenshots only, 100 steps) (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2026 | MiMo-V2.6 Pro technical report | 82 | OSWorld-Verified (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Jul 27, 2026 | Kimi K3 technical report | 84.8 | OSWorld-Verified (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 21, 2026 | | 83 | OSWorld-Verified (results table, p.4) | Capabilities |
| Jul 21, 2026 | | 74 | OSWorld-Verified (results table, p.4) | Capabilities |
| Jul 9, 2026 | | 80.8 | OSWorld-Verified, mean per-task reward, 361 tasks (Figure 44) | Capabilities |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 system card | 81.2 | OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate averaged over five runs, max effort, 100 steps (Table 8.1.A, 8.10.2) | Capabilities |
| Jun 9, 2026 | Claude Fable 5 system card | 85 | OSWorld-Verified, 361 tasks, 100 steps, pass@1 averaged over five runs, max effort, after the zoom-tool fix and 128K per-turn tokens (Table 8.1.A) | Capabilities |
| May 28, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | 83.4 | OSWorld-Verified first-attempt success rate, 361 tasks, 100 steps, max effort, five runs, zoom tool fix and 128K tokens per turn (Table 8.1.A, 8.12.6) | Capabilities |
| May 19, 2026 | | 78.4 | OSWorld-Verified (results table, p.4) | Capabilities |
| Apr 27, 2026 | | 47.4 | OSWorld, reasoning on, version not stated, mapped to OSWorld-Verified as in the launch record (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Apr 16, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 system card | 78 | OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate, average of five runs (Table 8.1.A, 8.9.4) | Capabilities |
| Apr 7, 2026 | Claude Mythos Preview system card | 79.6 | OSWorld (named OSWorld in the card), first-attempt success rate, average of five runs, 1080p, 100 steps (Table 6.3.A, 6.11.4) | Capabilities |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 system card | 72.5 | OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate, average of five runs (Table 2.1.A, 2.6) | Capabilities |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.6 system card | 72.7 | OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate, average of five runs, 1080p, 100 steps (Table 2.3.A, 2.8) | Capabilities |
| Jan 30, 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 63.3 | OSWorld-Verified, GUI actions only (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Nov 24, 2025 | Claude Opus 4.5 system card | 66.3 | OSWorld, P@1 avg@5, 1080p, 100 steps, 64k thinking (Table 2.3.A; 66.26% in 2.9) | Capabilities |
The lab's number comes out ahead in 0 of 5 pairs that differ
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 5 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 66.3% Computer use OSWorld | 76.3% Leaderboard, 100 steps, VLAA-GUI | −10.0 pts |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 72.5% Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified | 81.5% Leaderboard, 100 steps, Pointer Agent | −9.0 pts |
| Claude Opus 4.7 | 78% Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified | 83.6% Leaderboard, 100 steps, Pointer Agent | −5.6 pts |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 61.4% Computer use OSWorld (official OSWorld-Verified framework, 100 max steps) | 62.9% Leaderboard, 100 steps | −1.5 pts |
| Claude Fable 5 | 85% Computer use OSWorld-Verified | 86% Leaderboard, 1M context, 100 steps | −1.0 pts |
| | 80.8% OSWorld-Verified (Agentic computer use) | 80.7% Leaderboard, 100 steps | Same |
| Kimi K2.6 | 73.1% OSWorld-Verified | 73.1% Leaderboard, 100 steps | Same |
| | 75.2% OSWorld-Verified | 75.2% Leaderboard, 100 steps | Same |
| | 73.3% OSWorld-Verified (enable_thinking=False) | 73.3% Leaderboard, 100 steps | Same |
| Kimi K2.5 | 63.3% OSWorld-Verified, GUI actions only (Table 4) | 63.3% Leaderboard, 100 steps | Same |
One logged change that moves scores
Changes by the maintainers, so a score from before a change may not compare with one from after it. Newest first, each with the maintainers' own source. The list may be incomplete. What we log.
- Grader changed November 2nd, 2026
The maintainers replaced permissive document and spreadsheet checks with stricter content checks. Incorrect outputs that previously passed can now fail. Source
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
Sources: Official leaderboards, boards copied by Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) and labs’ model cards
More in Computer and browser use
- BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
- ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
- AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces.
Muse Spark 1.1 69%
- MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%
- RecreationBench In use Agents explore a running reference app and rebuild it, across 250 tasks on five platforms. Programmatic tests and a VLM judge score the result. GPT-6 Astra 58.1%