MVBench
Models answer multiple-choice questions across 20 temporal video tasks that a single frame cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
TVBench authors found many MVBench questions solvable without temporal reasoning.
- Released
- November 2023
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GLM-5.3-Flash #52 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
With the rapid development of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), a number of diagnostic benchmarks have recently emerged to evaluate the comprehension capabilities of these models. However, most benchmarks predominantly assess spatial understanding in the static image tasks, while overlooking temporal understanding in the dynamic video tasks. To alleviate this issue, we introduce a comprehensive Multi-modal Video understanding Benchmark, namely MVBench, which covers 20 challenging video tasks that cannot be effectively solved with a single frame. Specifically, we first introduce a novel static-to-dynamic method to define these temporal-related tasks. By transforming various static tasks into dynamic ones, we enable the systematic generation of video tasks that require a broad spectrum of temporal skills, ranging from perception to cognition. Then, guided by the task definition, we automatically convert public video annotations into multiple-choice QA to evaluate each task. On one hand, such a distinct paradigm allows us to build MVBench efficiently, without much manual intervention. On the other hand, it guarantees evaluation fairness with ground-truth video annotations, avoiding the biased scoring of LLMs. Moreover, we further develop a robust video MLLM baseline, i.e., VideoChat2, by progressive multi-modal training with diverse instruction-tuning data. The extensive results on our MVBench reveal that, the existing MLLMs are far from satisfactory in temporal understanding, while our VideoChat2 largely surpasses these leading models by over 15% on MVBench. All models and data are available at https://github.com/OpenGVLab/Ask-Anything.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 79% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Video-CCAM-7B-v1.2 leads with 69.2% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 79%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 79.0
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 77.8 GLM-5.3-Flash
- 77.6
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 76.6
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 76.5
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 75.5
Qwen3.6 27B
- 75.2
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 75.2
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 74.9 GLM-4.6V
- 74.8
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 74.6
Qwen3.5-27B
- 74.6
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 74.4
Seed1.5-VL
- 74.4
Qwen3.5-9B
- 73.2
Cosmos3-Nano
- 73.0 GLM-4.5V
- 71.2
Qwen3.5-4B
- 70.4
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 70.3
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 68.4 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 64.9
Qwen3.5-2B
- 58.2
Cosmos3-Edge
- 55.8
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 1
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 79%
- 2 GLM-5.3-Flash 77.8%
- 3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 77.6%
- 4
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 76.6%
- 5
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 76.5%
- 6
Qwen3.6 27B 75.5%
- 7
LongCat-Flash-Omni 75.2%
- 8
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 75.2%
- 9 GLM-4.6V 74.9%
- 10
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 74.8%
- 11
Qwen3.5-27B 74.6%
- 12
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 74.6%
- 13
Seed1.5-VL 74.4%
- 14
Qwen3.5-9B 74.4%
- 15
Cosmos3-Nano 73.2%
- 16 GLM-4.5V 73%
- 17
Qwen3.5-4B 71.2%
- 18
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 70.4%
- 19
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 70.3%
- 20 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 68.4%
- 21
Qwen3.5-2B 64.9%
- 22
Cosmos3-Edge 58.2%
- 23
Qwen3.5-0.8B 55.8%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 Video-CCAM-7B-v1.2 69.2%
- 2 TimeMarker 67.4%
- 3 video_chat2_mistral 60.4%
- 4 ST-LLM 54.9%
- 5 internlm-7b 41.7%
Source: Official MVBench leaderboard
- 79.0
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 77.8 GLM-5.3-Flash
- 77.6
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 76.6
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 76.5
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 75.5
Qwen3.6 27B
- 75.2
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 75.2
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 74.9 GLM-4.6V
- 74.8
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 74.6
Qwen3.5-27B
- 74.6
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 74.4
Seed1.5-VL
- 74.4
Qwen3.5-9B
- 73.2
Cosmos3-Nano
- 73.0 GLM-4.5V
- 71.2
Qwen3.5-4B
- 70.4
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 70.3
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 69.2 Video-CCAM-7B-v1.2
- 68.4 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 67.4 TimeMarker
- 64.9
Qwen3.5-2B
- 60.4 video_chat2_mistral
- 58.2
Cosmos3-Edge
- 55.8
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 54.9 ST-LLM
- 41.7 internlm-7b
- 1
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 79%
- 2 GLM-5.3-Flash 77.8%
- 3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 77.6%
- 4
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 76.6%
- 5
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 76.5%
- 6
Qwen3.6 27B 75.5%
- 7
LongCat-Flash-Omni 75.2%
- 8
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 75.2%
- 9 GLM-4.6V 74.9%
- 10
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 74.8%
- 11
Qwen3.5-27B 74.6%
- 12
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 74.6%
- 13
Seed1.5-VL 74.4%
- 14
Qwen3.5-9B 74.4%
- 15
Cosmos3-Nano 73.2%
- 16 GLM-4.5V 73%
- 17
Qwen3.5-4B 71.2%
- 18
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 70.4%
- 19
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 70.3%
- 20 Video-CCAM-7B-v1.2 69.2%
- 21 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 68.4%
- 22 TimeMarker 67.4%
- 23
Qwen3.5-2B 64.9%
- 24 video_chat2_mistral 60.4%
- 25
Cosmos3-Edge 58.2%
- 26
Qwen3.5-0.8B 55.8%
- 27 ST-LLM 54.9%
- 28 internlm-7b 41.7%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official MVBench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 79% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 77.8% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 77.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 76.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 76.5% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 75.5% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 75.2% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 75.2% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | GLM-4.6V | 74.9% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 74.8% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 74.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 74.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 74.4% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 74.4% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 73.2% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | GLM-4.5V | 73% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 71.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 70.4% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 70.3% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 68.4% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 64.9% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 58.2% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 55.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Video-CCAM-7B-v1.2 | 69.2% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | TimeMarker | 67.4% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | video_chat2_mistral | 60.4% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | ST-LLM | 54.9% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | internlm-7b | 41.7% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 79% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 77.8% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 77.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 76.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 76.5% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 75.5% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 75.2% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 75.2% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | GLM-4.6V | 74.9% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 74.8% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 74.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 74.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 74.4% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 74.4% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 73.2% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | GLM-4.5V | 73% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 71.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 70.4% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 70.3% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | Video-CCAM-7B-v1.2 | 69.2% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 68.4% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | TimeMarker | 67.4% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 64.9% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | video_chat2_mistral | 60.4% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 58.2% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 55.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | ST-LLM | 54.9% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | internlm-7b | 41.7% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 36 entries, 5 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
5 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in November 2023 3 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in November 2023 8 models have held number one with claims included since its release in November 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official MVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official MVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in August 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 77.8 | MVbench |
| Apr 22, 2026 | 75.5 | MVBench | |
| Apr 15, 2026 | 74.6 | MVBench | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 79 | MVBench | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 55.8 | MVBench 55.8/-- (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 64.9 | MVBench 64.9/-- (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 71.2 | MVBench | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 74.4 | MVBench | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 74.8 | MVBench | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 74.6 | MVBench | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 76.6 | MVBench | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 77.6 | MVBench | |
| Oct 31, 2025 | 75.2 | MVBench | |
| Aug 25, 2025 | 76.5 | MVBench | |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 73 | MVBench |
| May 12, 2025 | 74.4 | MVBench | |
| Mar 27, 2025 | 70.3 | MVBench | |
| Mar 16, 2025 | MVBench | ||
| Jan 28, 2025 | 70.4 | MVBench |
12 system cards report it, from 6 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2026 | | 73.2 | MVBench, Cosmos3-Nano 8B column, Table 10 | Capabilities |
| May 31, 2026 | | 58.2 | MVBench, Cosmos3-Edge 2B column, Table 10 | Capabilities |
| Apr 17, 2026 | | 79 | MVBench (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jan 1, 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 74.9 | MVBench, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 75.2 | MVBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Oct 31, 2025 | | 75.2 | MVBench (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Aug 25, 2025 | | 76.5 | MVBench, 16 frames (Table 2, Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Aug 13, 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 73 | MVBench, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 68.4 | MVBench, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 74.4 | MVBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 74.3 | Capabilities |
| Mar 26, 2025 | | 70.3 | MVBench (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | 70.4 | MVBench (Table 8) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%