Benchmark Almanac

MVBench

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 79% leads since March 2026
Video-CCAM-7B-v1.2 69.2% leads since September 2024
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 79% leads since March 2026
Fading

Models answer multiple-choice questions across 20 temporal video tasks that a single frame cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.

TVBench authors found many MVBench questions solvable without temporal reasoning.

Released
November 2023
Kind
Video understanding
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GLM-5.3-Flash #52 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
August 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

With the rapid development of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), a number of diagnostic benchmarks have recently emerged to evaluate the comprehension capabilities of these models. However, most benchmarks predominantly assess spatial understanding in the static image tasks, while overlooking temporal understanding in the dynamic video tasks. To alleviate this issue, we introduce a comprehensive Multi-modal Video understanding Benchmark, namely MVBench, which covers 20 challenging video tasks that cannot be effectively solved with a single frame. Specifically, we first introduce a novel static-to-dynamic method to define these temporal-related tasks. By transforming various static tasks into dynamic ones, we enable the systematic generation of video tasks that require a broad spectrum of temporal skills, ranging from perception to cognition. Then, guided by the task definition, we automatically convert public video annotations into multiple-choice QA to evaluate each task. On one hand, such a distinct paradigm allows us to build MVBench efficiently, without much manual intervention. On the other hand, it guarantees evaluation fairness with ground-truth video annotations, avoiding the biased scoring of LLMs. Moreover, we further develop a robust video MLLM baseline, i.e., VideoChat2, by progressive multi-modal training with diverse instruction-tuning data. The extensive results on our MVBench reveal that, the existing MLLMs are far from satisfactory in temporal understanding, while our VideoChat2 largely surpasses these leading models by over 15% on MVBench. All models and data are available at https://github.com/OpenGVLab/Ask-Anything.

Abstract of MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmark (arXiv:2311.17005, CC0)
23
Models scored in lab cards
19
Launch posts list it, from 6 labs
12
System cards report it, from 6 labs

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 79% among models released by August 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Video-CCAM-7B-v1.2 leads with 69.2% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 79%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 79%
  2. 2 GLM-5.3-Flash 77.8%
  3. 3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 77.6%
  4. 4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 76.6%
  5. 5 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 76.5%
  6. 6 Qwen3.6 27B 75.5%
  7. 7 LongCat-Flash-Omni 75.2%
  8. 8 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 75.2%
  9. 9 GLM-4.6V 74.9%
  10. 10 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 74.8%
  11. 11 Qwen3.5-27B 74.6%
  12. 12 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 74.6%
  13. 13 Seed1.5-VL 74.4%
  14. 14 Qwen3.5-9B 74.4%
  15. 15 Cosmos3-Nano 73.2%
  16. 16 GLM-4.5V 73%
  17. 17 Qwen3.5-4B 71.2%
  18. 18 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 70.4%
  19. 19 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 70.3%
  20. 20 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 68.4%
  21. 21 Qwen3.5-2B 64.9%
  22. 22 Cosmos3-Edge 58.2%
  23. 23 Qwen3.5-0.8B 55.8%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Source: Official MVBench leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 79% Mar 2026 Lab model card
2 GLM-5.3-Flash 77.8% Aug 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 77.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 76.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
5 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 76.5% Aug 2025 Lab model card
6 Qwen3.6 27B 75.5% Apr 2026 Lab model card
7 LongCat-Flash-Omni 75.2% Oct 2025 Lab model card
8 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 75.2% Nov 2025 Lab model card
9 GLM-4.6V 74.9% Jan 2026 Lab model card
10 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 74.8% Feb 2026 Lab model card
11 Qwen3.5-27B 74.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
12 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 74.6% Apr 2026 Lab model card
13 Seed1.5-VL 74.4% May 2025 Lab model card
14 Qwen3.5-9B 74.4% Mar 2026 Lab model card
15 Cosmos3-Nano 73.2% May 2026 Lab model card
16 GLM-4.5V 73% Aug 2025 Lab model card
17 Qwen3.5-4B 71.2% Mar 2026 Lab model card
18 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 70.4% Jan 2025 Lab model card
19 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 70.3% Mar 2025 Lab model card
20 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 68.4% Jul 2025 Lab model card
21 Qwen3.5-2B 64.9% Mar 2026 Lab model card
22 Cosmos3-Edge 58.2% May 2026 Lab model card
23 Qwen3.5-0.8B 55.8% Mar 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Video-CCAM-7B-v1.2 69.2% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
2 TimeMarker 67.4% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
3 video_chat2_mistral 60.4% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
4 ST-LLM 54.9% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
5 internlm-7b 41.7% Jul 2023 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 79% Mar 2026 Lab model card
2 GLM-5.3-Flash 77.8% Aug 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 77.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 76.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
5 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 76.5% Aug 2025 Lab model card
6 Qwen3.6 27B 75.5% Apr 2026 Lab model card
7 LongCat-Flash-Omni 75.2% Oct 2025 Lab model card
8 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 75.2% Nov 2025 Lab model card
9 GLM-4.6V 74.9% Jan 2026 Lab model card
10 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 74.8% Feb 2026 Lab model card
11 Qwen3.5-27B 74.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
12 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 74.6% Apr 2026 Lab model card
13 Seed1.5-VL 74.4% May 2025 Lab model card
14 Qwen3.5-9B 74.4% Mar 2026 Lab model card
15 Cosmos3-Nano 73.2% May 2026 Lab model card
16 GLM-4.5V 73% Aug 2025 Lab model card
17 Qwen3.5-4B 71.2% Mar 2026 Lab model card
18 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 70.4% Jan 2025 Lab model card
19 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 70.3% Mar 2025 Lab model card
20 Video-CCAM-7B-v1.2 69.2% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
21 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 68.4% Jul 2025 Lab model card
22 TimeMarker 67.4% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
23 Qwen3.5-2B 64.9% Mar 2026 Lab model card
24 video_chat2_mistral 60.4% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
25 Cosmos3-Edge 58.2% May 2026 Lab model card
26 Qwen3.5-0.8B 55.8% Mar 2026 Lab model card
27 ST-LLM 54.9% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
28 internlm-7b 41.7% Jul 2023 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 36 entries, 5 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

5 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in November 2023 3 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in November 2023 8 models have held number one with claims included since its release in November 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Other labs Qwen ByteDance Seed Shanghai AI Lab
Own leaderboard Not tested since Nov 2024
Video-CCAM-7B-v1.2 69.2%
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026

Sources: Official MVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus InternVL3.5-241B-A28B Qwen2.5-VL-72B video_chat2_mistral internlm-7b 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus Qwen2.5-VL-72B

Sources: Official MVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in August 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
Baidu
ByteDance Seed
Z.ai
Shanghai AI Lab
Meituan
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 26, 2026 GLM-5.3-Flash 77.8 MVbench
Apr 22, 2026 Qwen3.6 27B 75.5 MVBench
Apr 15, 2026 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 74.6 MVBench
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 79 MVBench
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-0.8B 55.8 MVBench 55.8/-- (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-2B 64.9 MVBench 64.9/-- (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-4B 71.2 MVBench
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-9B 74.4 MVBench
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 74.8 MVBench
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-27B 74.6 MVBench
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 76.6 MVBench
Feb 16, 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 77.6 MVBench
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 75.2 MVBench
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 76.5 MVBench
Aug 11, 2025 GLM-4.5V 73 MVBench
May 12, 2025 Seed1.5-VL 74.4 MVBench
Mar 27, 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 70.3 MVBench
Mar 16, 2025 ERNIE 4.5 MVBench
Jan 28, 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 70.4 MVBench

12 system cards report it, from 6 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Nano technical report 73.2 MVBench, Cosmos3-Nano 8B column, Table 10 Capabilities
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Edge technical report 58.2 MVBench, Cosmos3-Edge 2B column, Table 10 Capabilities
Apr 17, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 79 MVBench (Table 6) Capabilities
Jan 1, 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 74.9 MVBench, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Nov 26, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 75.2 MVBench (Table 2) Capabilities
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 75.2 MVBench (Table 6) Capabilities
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 76.5 MVBench, 16 frames (Table 2, Table 9) Capabilities
Aug 13, 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 73 MVBench, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Jul 1, 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 68.4 MVBench, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
May 11, 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 74.4 MVBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 74.3 Capabilities
Mar 26, 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B technical report 70.3 MVBench (Table 7) Capabilities
Feb 19, 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 70.4 MVBench (Table 8) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 233 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%